Trump's Conviction Suggests Jurors Bought the Prosecution's Dubious 'Election Fraud' Narrative
There was a glaring mismatch between the charges against the former president and what prosecutors described as the essence of his crime.
There was a glaring mismatch between the charges against the former president and what prosecutors described as the essence of his crime.
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
The judge said the jurors need not agree about the "unlawful means" that Trump allegedly used to promote his 2016 election.
Closing arguments in the former president's trial highlight the mismatch between the charges and the "election fraud" he supposedly committed.
This week the judge presiding over Trump's trial ruled that jurors do not have to agree on any particular legal theory.
To convert a hush payment into 34 felonies, prosecutors are relying on a chain of assumptions with several weak links.
Dexter Taylor is now a "violent felon," even though his hobby was victimless.
Contrary to what prosecutors say, the former president is not charged with "conspiracy" or "election fraud."
Under the prosecution's theory, Trump would be guilty of falsifying business records even if Daniels made the whole thing up.
Nominated stories include journalism on messy nutrition research, pickleball, government theft, homelessness, and more.
New York prosecutors are relying on testimony from several people who do not seem trustworthy.
Plus: Airbnb ban has predictable consequences, AI nudify app, the death of swagger, and more...
To convert a hush money payment into 34 felonies, prosecutors are invoking an obscure state election law that experts say has never been used before.
Vincent Yakaitis is unfortunately not the first such defendant. He will also not be the last.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about the magical thinking behind the economic ideas of Modern Monetary Theory.
The ruling has nothing to do with #MeToo. It is about ensuring a fair trial—a principle that applies no matter how unsympathetic the defendant.
A report from Good Jobs First found that 80 percent of state development agency revenue comes from fees: The more tax money they give out, the more they get to keep.
The needless complexity of affordable housing programs are hurting people they're supposed to help.
Since Donald Trump's alleged falsification of business records happened after he was elected president, he clearly was not trying to ensure that outcome.
Plus: Zoning reform in Minnesota stalls, a New York housing "deal" does little for housing supply, and Colorado ends occupancy limits.
The leading possibilities are all problematic in one way or another.
Plus: Problems for Saudi Arabia's The Line, Hawaii considers a short-term rental crackdown, and when affordable housing mandates get you less affordable housing.
The state’s policies and practices seemed designed to strangle the legal cannabis supply.
Too many property owners are having trouble asserting their rights, but not everything is "squatter's rights."
New York's botched recreational marijuana rollout just keeps looking worse.
Thanks to "squatters' rights" laws, evicting a squatter can be so expensive and cumbersome that some people simply walk away from their homes.
Plus: New York refreshes rent control, AOC and Bernie Sanders call for more, greener public housing, and California's "builder's remedy" wins big in court.
Three years after the state legalized recreational marijuana, unauthorized weed shops outnumber licensed dispensaries by 23 to 1.
Peter Moskos, criminal justice professor and former Baltimore police officer, discusses ways to reform policing and turn failing cities around on the latest Just Asking Questions podcast.
State officials “jawboned” financial firms into cutting ties with the gun-rights group.
The defamation lawsuit is the latest in Trump's campaign of lawfare against media outlets, but all of those suits have failed so far.
A story about a young man who just wants to legally work, if only the system would let him.
Plus: Microaggression discourse, AI espionage, housing policy wins, and more...
Plus: Migrant resettlement, Tom Cotton op-ed scandal, oppressors-in-training, and more...
Plus: Teen boys go after tampons, Ken Paxton goes after migrant charities, and more...
Neither Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg nor New York Attorney General Letitia James can explain exactly who was victimized by the dishonesty they cite.
Plus: A listener asks if the editors have criteria for what constitutes a good law.
Thomas agreed with the Court's decision to not take up two challenges to New York's rent stabilization law but said the constitutionality of rent control "is an important and pressing question."
The law that Attorney General Letitia James used to sue the former president does not require proof that anyone was injured by his financial dishonesty.
Despite brazenly lying on financial documents and inventing valuations seemingly out of thin air, Trump's lender did not testify that it would have valued his loans any differently.
The essence of the case, the Manhattan D.A. says, is that Trump "corrupt[ed] a presidential election" by concealing embarrassing information.
The credit "is at best a break-even proposition and more likely a net cost" for the state.
R. Anthony Rupp III was cited and detained after he called a police officer an "asshole" after the cop nearly drove into two pedestrians.
Plus: rent control behind financial problems at NYCB, public housing's corruption problem, and New York City's near-zero vacancy rate.
The freedom to protest is essential to the American project. It also does not give you carte blanche to violate other laws.
It's taxpayers who lose when politicians give gifts, grants, and loans to private companies.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10