SCOTUS Probably Won't Put Any New Limits on Warrantless Home Searches
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week about the "emergency aid exception" to the Fourth Amendment.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week about the "emergency aid exception" to the Fourth Amendment.
Even well-intentioned “community caretaking” can’t justify ignoring the Fourth Amendment.
A new FinCEN rule forced small money services businesses to collect personal data on nearly every customer transaction. Lawsuits claim this violates the Fourth Amendment.
In a new Supreme Court term packed with big cases, these disputes stand out.
“I got arrested twice for being a Latino working in construction,” says Leo Garcia Venegas, the lead plaintiff in a new lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice challenging warrantless ICE raids on construction sites.
By expanding federal agents' authority to collect the DNA of immigrant detainees, the government has risked violating Americans’ rights.
Although the officers were eventually criminally convicted, Jarius Brown is still pursuing damages to cover the medical expenses for serious injuries to his face, nose, and chest.
The justice’s stance on immigration enforcement is undermined by the facts of the case before him.
There is no majority opinion, so the reasoning is unclear. But Justice Kavanaugh's concurring opinion undercuts principle that government must abjure racial discrimination.
A federal judge cleared the way for Jennifer Heath Box's lawsuit against the cops who misidentified her as a fugitive, despite a "mountain of evidence" that they had the wrong woman.
The war on drugs authorizes police conduct that otherwise would be readily recognized as criminal.
SCOTUS will soon decide.
Checkpoints for general crime control are illegal and smack of a police state.
The technology enables routine surveillance that would have troubled the Fourth Amendment’s framers.
The federal government has embraced unconstitutional tactics and now wants SCOTUS to do the same.
A federal court says U.S. citizens “are likely to succeed in showing” that immigration agents violated their rights.
Joshua Rohrer's dog, Sunshine, ran away and was later hit and killed by a car.
Local officials initially were unfazed by complaints that the constant surveillance raised serious privacy concerns.
The twist underscores just how little accountability exists in civil forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to seize assets without charging the owner with a crime.
Brett Hankison was convicted of violating Breonna Taylor’s Fourth Amendment rights during a fatal no-knock police raid.
Alexandra Weaver argued that she could not reasonably have been expected to know her actions were unconstitutional.
The child, and her 12-year-old brother, were left under the supervision of a neighbor by the mother, who left town for six days for a foreign job interview.
America is slipping steadily down the slippery slope to a surveillance state.
Cops should not be free to forgo the modicum of care required to make sure they’re in the right place.
Penny McCarthy is suing the federal agents who insisted she was a fugitive despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
would violate the Fourth Amendment, holds the Eleventh Circuit.
Michael Mendenhall wants the Supreme Court to reconsider a precedent that allows home invasions based on nothing but hearsay.
No, says a magistrate judge.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Garcia rejected the argument that the officers "recklessly created the need to apply deadly force by going to the wrong address."
The decision revives a lawsuit against a Texas officer who shot a driver after endangering himself by jumping onto a moving car.
A Supreme Court case could determine whether Americans own their digital data—or whether the government can take that information without a warrant.
The memo says "Alien Enemies" aren't subject "to a judicial review of the removal in any court of the United States."
Detroit lawyer Amir Makled has confidential client data on his phone. That didn’t stop U.S. Customs and Border Protection from trying to search it.
Know how much the law does—and doesn’t—protect your privacy rights.
Already this year, the agency has allegedly conducted a warrantless raid in Newark and several warrantless arrests in the Midwest.
Linda Martin's lawsuit alleges that the agency violated her right to due process when it took her $40,200 and sent her a notice failing to articulate the reason.
Whether or not a reasonable police officer violates clearly established law when he declines to check the features and address of his target house before raiding it is thus still up for debate.
"Founding-era common law gave officers no authority to make an 'arrest without a warrant, for a mere misdemeanor not committed in [their] presence.'"
The newly confirmed head of the country's leading law enforcement agency has a history of advocating politically motivated investigations even while condemning them.
A driver who was acquitted of drunk driving joins a class action lawsuit provoked by a bribery scheme that went undetected for decades.
Video of the incident shows Micah Washington screaming as a Reform, Alabama, police officer deploys a Taser directly into his back.
The Justice Department temporarily suspended the program in November because of "significant risks" of constitutional violations.
A police incident report admitted "we had no probable cause" to arrest the man on loitering and prowling charges after he wouldn't give his name to officers.
"Speaking from a balcony isn't a crime," the man's lawyer says. "And just because a cop was offended because of some language doesn't give him the power to arrest you."
Trump’s pick for federal drug enforcement was ousted for not respecting personal freedom. Too bad that that’s a job requirement.
A judge says the federal law has no constitutional basis and threatens First and Fourth Amendment rights.