Federal Intervention in Campus Protests Is Going Too Far
Department of Education settlements with protest-wracked colleges threaten censorship by bureaucracy.
Department of Education settlements with protest-wracked colleges threaten censorship by bureaucracy.
Supervised release shouldn't require former inmates to give up their First Amendment rights.
And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.
Even as he praises judicial decisions that made room for "dissenters" and protected "robust political debate," Tim Wu pushes sweeping rationales for censorship.
"This is an obvious attempt to use our public schools to convert kids to Christianity. We live in a democracy, not a theocracy," one ACLU attorney tells Reason.
The majority opinion makes clear that social media content moderation is an activity protected by the First Amendment. That likely dooms large parts of the state laws restricting content moderation.
The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.
Although the FBI never produced evidence that Ali Hemani was a threat to national security, it seems determined to imprison him by any means necessary.
The standing requirements laid down by the majority might make it extremely difficult or impossible for victims of indirect goverment censorship to get their cases to court.
The verdict in Murthy v. Missouri is a big, flashing green light that jawboning may resume.
Murthy v. Missouri challenges government efforts to suppress dissenting viewpoints on social media.
"It’s not like public health is infallible," the Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration author tells Reason's Nick Gillespie.
The justices ruled that "objective evidence" of retaliation does not require "very specific comparator evidence."
Numerous federal appeals courts have ruled that filming police is protected under the First Amendment, but police continue to illegally arrest people for it.
Plus: unpermitted ADUs in San Jose, Sen. J.D. Vance's mass deportation plan for housing affordability, and the California Coastal Commission's anti-housing record.
Phoenix police are trained that "deescalation" means overwhelming and immediate force, whether or not it's necessary.
This isn't the first time a student event has been canceled over alleged safety issues.
The court ruled that it is unconstitutional for officials to remove library books with the "intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree."
The plaintiffs hope to "help Republicans and conservatives see why this ban is inconsistent with the free speech values they say they care about."
A new law will make it much harder to film law enforcement officers in their public duties. Does that violate the First Amendment?
The transit authority was sued after rejecting an ad that directed viewers to go to a website "to find out about the faith of our founders."
Students have a constitutional right to refuse to say the Pledge of Allegiance, no matter what school officials think.
Chief executives' illicit motives can render their subordinates' actions unconstitutional. There is good reason for courts to enforce that rule.
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
An ideologically diverse mix of individuals and organizations supports a Texas journalist who was arrested for asking questions.
Justin Pulliam's arrest and lawsuit once again demand we ask if "real" journalists are entitled to a different set of rights.
Don’t unleash censors; restrain them more!
Eric Levitz argues that the left should take a stand against censorship—for practical rather than principled reasons.
Reginald Burks says he told a police officer, "Get your ass out of the way so I can take my kids to school." First Amendment lawyers say he can't be forced to apologize.
A bill backed by the Conference of Mayors would let courts issue restraining orders when people “harass” officials with information requests.
Nominated stories include journalism on messy nutrition research, pickleball, government theft, homelessness, and more.
Unless the Supreme Court rules against this practice, it is certain to continue.
Congress is "silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate," the company argues.
Christian McGhee is suing, arguing a North Carolina assistant principal infringed on his free speech rights.
Abortion rights groups have sued Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall after he said he would prosecute anyone who facilitates legal out-of-state abortions.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about cancelling student loan debt.
The college had a legal right to break up the pro-Palestine encampment. But does that mean it should?
Filming cops is a First Amendment right, and there are already plenty of laws against harassing them.
The protesters deserve criticism—but Congress is the real threat.
"We will continue to fight for the right to access the internet without intrusive government oversight," says the group challenging the law.
Julian Assange and Priscilla Villarreal were both arrested for publishing information that government officials wanted to conceal.
David Knott helps clients retrieve unclaimed property from the government. The state has made it considerably harder for him to do that.
Calls from the left and right to mimic European speech laws bring the U.S. to a crossroads between robust First Amendment protections and rising regulation.
The bill would allow the Education Department to effectively force colleges to suppress a wide range of protected speech.
How the Backpage prosecution helped create a playbook for suppressing online speech, debanking disfavored groups, and using "conspiracy" charges to imprison the government's targets
Half the country says suppressing “false information” is more important than press freedom.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10