Whether or Not Trump Invokes It, the Insurrection Act Is Antiquated and Dangerously Broad
On its face, the law gives the president sweeping authority to deploy the military in response to domestic disorder.
On its face, the law gives the president sweeping authority to deploy the military in response to domestic disorder.
Plus: Suspect in Minnesota shootings arrested, Iran and Israel still fighting, Ross Ulbricht speaks, and more...
Deportation means expelling an alien back to their home country for violating immigration law. Many of the Trump administration's actions don't meet that definition.
Like King Charles, he is abusing emergency powers to impose taxes without legislative authorization.
The coalition’s national press coordinator says, “We’re all dedicated to championing the cause of nonviolence—not just because it’s moral, but because it’s more effective.”
Joe Biden showed that the 25th Amendment doesn't work. Donald Trump showed that impeachment is broken too.
A blow to recent arrivals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela
Most Americans, it turns out, do not think it is a good use of taxpayer money, according to a recent poll.
U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz highlights the chilling impact of Marco Rubio's dubious rationale for deporting students whose views offend him.
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer concluded that the president failed to comply with the statute he cited—and violated the 10th Amendment too.
The Trump administration, which was ready to negotiate on Sunday, is now gambling on an all-out war.
It explains why a nondelegation challenge could work and deserves to win, despite Trump v. Hawaii.
It's a return to the Reagan era, but not in the way that should make conservatives happy.
And Americans deserve dissenting voices that aren’t inept and crazy.
Trump's policy here is yet another example of abusive invocation of emergency powers.
The Kentucky senator is also not a big fan of military parades, populist economics, or shredding due process.
The truth is less dramatic—and more important.
Americans shouldn’t have to read the tea leaves to know about life-and-death decisions made by their government.
Plus: Tensions in the Middle East, another terrible Boeing crash, intimacy coordinators, and more...
Plus: When Stalin Meets Star Wars.
Most of what the department does would likely stick around, for better or for worse.
The budget legislation is full of other expensive provisions that will add trillions to our sky-high national debt.
The Supreme Court ruled decades ago that burning the flag is protected by the First Amendment, no matter how offensive that act may be.
Plus: Trump's big parade, Elon Musk makes amends, Zohran Mamdani gains, and more...
Even if the president was joking in both cases, he already has used his powers to punish people whose views offend him.
It's disappointing. But the court will hear the case on the merits on an expedited basis, and we have a strong case.
Attorney Laura Powell of Californians for Good Governance joins the show to discuss the civil unrest in Los Angeles following federal immigration raids.
In a federal lawsuit, California's governor argues that the president's assertion of control over "the State's militia" is illegal and unconstitutional.
Trump and the right are living out their fantasies of rewriting the awful summer of 2020.
Plus: The glorious return of drive-in movie season.
The article describes how the two can be mutually reinforcing, building on lessons from previous episodes in constitutional history.
Are outdated laws ripe for abuse? A listener asks whether it's time to sunset certain old laws.
The Department of Justice brought the deported Salvadoran back to U.S. soil for trial, reversing its long-held contention that he would "never" return.
Yoo's criticisms are off the mark, for a variety of reasons. But, tellingly, he actually agrees Trump's IEEPA tariffs are illegal, merely disagreeing with the court's reasons for reaching that conclusion.
Karoline Leavitt's threat against ABC News is an attack on free speech.
The CIT ruling is much stronger than Prof. Goldsmith contends. The same is true of a related ruling by federal District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras.
Trump's domestic use of the military to counter anti-deportation protests in LA is so far very limited. But that could change. A big part of the root of the problem is the lawless behavior of federal immigation-enforcement agencies.
Those accused of wrongdoing have the right to challenge the evidence against them before the government takes away their liberty.
Trump v. Hawaii may block a challenge based on unconstitutional discrimination. But it does not preclude a nondelegation case. Other recent developments may actually bolster that approach.
Most imports to the U.S. are raw materials, intermediate parts, or equipment—the stuff that manufacturing firms need to make things.
The Trump Administration returned the illegally deported migrant from imprisonment in El Salvador after repeatedly claiming they could not do so.
Neither Russia nor Ukraine has a clear path to victory. The Ukrainian drone attack last week and the Russian air raids on Friday don't change that.
Next week could be a pivotal one, as a federal appeals court could decide whether to restore an injunction against Trump's tariffs.
The case against Michelino Sunseri exemplifies the injustice caused by the proliferation of regulatory crimes—the target of a recent presidential order.
This crucial procedural issue is now before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Its resolution will determine whether the tariffs are immediately suspended, or get to continue so long as the case is stil being litigated.
In a petty, public war of words, Trump threatens to cut off federal support to Musk's companies after the billionaire attacked his deficit-busting budget bill.
Plus: A cynical take on Zohran Mamdani, Florida's drinking water threatened, and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10