Courts Shouldn't Rely on Election Returns to Give Trump a Blank Check for Policies Motivated by Unconstitutional Discrimination
The key issue in such cases is the motivation of the official who adopted by the policy, not who voted for him.
The key issue in such cases is the motivation of the official who adopted by the policy, not who voted for him.
As hurricane damage mounts, the government is buying—and sometimes seizing—homes in flood-prone areas, sparking concerns over property rights and accusations of discrimination.
Federal housing officials allege a New Hampshire landlord violated the Fair Housing Act for refusing to show a unit to two women with emotional support dogs.
Judge Joseph Bianco’s decision emphasizes that constitutional rights and protections belong to individuals, not groups.
Under the law, the feds couldn't deny you a job or security clearance just because you've used marijuana in the past.
President Mohamed Muizzu cannot claim to be on the right side of history while adhering to a textbook definition of bigotry.
Chief executives' illicit motives can render their subordinates' actions unconstitutional. There is good reason for courts to enforce that rule.
The anniversary is today. The American Journal of Law and Equality is publishing a symposium on Brown to mark the occasion. I am one of the contributors.
The Institute for Justice has launched a project to reform land use regulation.
Plus: Colorado passes a string of zoning reforms, an upscale Los Angeles grocery store sues to stop new housing, and Democrats urge the White House to get moving on fair housing.
Sociologist Roderick Graham and I debated this issue at the Divided We Fall website.
In the Jim Crow South, businesses fought racism—because the rules denied them customers.
The anime Mashle: Magic and Muscles offers an absurdist metaphor for politically driven discrimination.
The ACLU's lawsuit is filed on behalf of a New York man whose application to stay in a Ronald McDonald House was denied because of his 12-year-old felony assault conviction.
Harvard concludes that it is, but I’m skeptical that this is right—just as I’d be skeptical that an employer’s restricting pro-Hamas speech constitutes such discrimination or harassment.
Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case
The best reforms would correct the real problems of overcriminalization and overincarceration, as well as removing all artificial barriers to building more homes.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development argues in its complaint that a failure to allow emotional support animals amounts to illegal disability discrimination under the Fair Housing Act.
A N.J. judge has thrown out the lawsuit, on the narrow grounds that, even if the newspaper deliberately discouraged people from attending the group's charity gala, the N.J. Law Against Discrimination doesn't apply to charity galas.
federal court allows the case to go forward.
HOPE Fair Housing Center argues in a new federal complaint that an Illinois landlord's blanket refusal to rent to people with eviction records amounts to illegal sex and race discrimination.
Plus: Elite colleges favor the rich, D.C. restaurants pass on new wage costs to customers, and more...
If activists want to help young people, they should start before college.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a live discussion of the Court's recent rulings on affirmative action and same-sex wedding services.
The speech compulsion it forbids is not limited to wedding-website designers who object to same-sex marriage, but its principles should apply only to a narrow range of commercial products
The decision reverses a terrible previous decision by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The answer's more complicated than you might think.
Joseph Zamora spent nearly two years in prison after being convicted of assaulting police officers. The Washington Supreme Court overturned his conviction, but local prosecutors want to charge him again to show him the "improperness of his behavior."
The decision sets a dangerous precedent licensing the use of facially neutral policies to discriminate against minorities in various contexts.
In a federal lawsuit on behalf of legal U.S. residents from China, the ACLU argues that "Florida's New Alien Land Law" is unconstitutional.
"When the government picks and chooses among religions," the lawsuit reads, "religious liberty is threatened for all."
Plus: Dominion defamation suit against Fox News starts today, Republicans' debt plan, and more...
"KCPD has continuously and repeatedly advised Plaintiff and his fellow officers that if they did not fulfill a 'ticket quota' then they would be kicked out of the unit," the complaint states.
Two New Jersey women who gave birth last fall suffered harrowing ordeals thanks to their breakfast choices.
Conflict between Irish-Americans and WASPs was once a major feature of American politics. Its near-total disappearance is a hopeful development that we can learn from.
"If I disagreed or offered another opinion, I was told I had cognitive dissonance," Josh Diemert says.
"Hamline subjected López Prater to the foregoing adverse actions because . . . she did not conform her conduct to the specific beliefs of a Muslim sect," the lawsuit states.
The first FBI director wasn't all bad (or a cross-dresser). But he and the agency he created regularly flouted constitutional limits on power.
A website designer asks SCOTUS to let her eschew work that contradicts her opposition to gay marriage.
The deal includes several amendments to the original draft legislation that are unlikely to have much substantive effect.
Gun control is 'the most racist practice in America,' says the Philadelphia native and community leader.
But Bank of America's Community Affordable Loan Solution program will likely be a gentrification accelerating machine.