DOJ Finds Excessive Force in Shootings by Miami Police
Seven men fatally shot over eight-month period
Seven men fatally shot over eight-month period
Well, he will certainly try to now, won't he?
Using same asset seizure rules applied to other illegal activities
An average of 36 per year, compared to 20 under George W. Bush
Asks judge to appoint independent monitor if she rules tactics are unconstitutional
They're doing a heckuva job, they say
That didn't take long at all
Related to surveillance of reporters
Currently those who kill protected species can't be prosecuted unless it can be proved they knew of the animal's status
Denies request to toss demands as illegal
None of them should be attending
Isn't the Attorney General bound by the same laws to tell the truth as the rest of us are?
The meetings will, of course, be off the record
Charles Ramsey's been in charge since 2008
Federal prosecutors unseal indictment against online currency exchange
Stole credit card information and other data
When the Obama Administration loses David Axelrod...
Obama has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate the case
Apple still faces DOJ accusations
DOJ took records for calls from at least five numbers associated with Fox news and two numbers from inside the White House
The prosecution, meanwhile, wants to censor the Internet
It probably won't really help protect leaks, but it's a start
Attorney has already resigned over incident
Well, that's going to open some floodgates
Bears a resemblance to the recent Associated Press scandal
Wants Obama to "rein in" the investigation
Were any laws broken by singling out conservative groups?
Did it really have no other way to track down a leaker?
Obama's war on transparency continues
Is there a rule of threes for scandals?
ACLU requested documents on government's policy of intercepting text messages
Unconstitutionally bans pretty much all talk that may be of a sexual nature
Campaign contributor opposed it, according to released documents
Those arrested for filming cops have constitutional rights, the DOJ writes to the U.S. District Court in Maryland
Ridiculous interpretation of the law
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks