Why We Can't Have Nice Things: The 'Chicken Tax' That Makes Pickup Trucks More Expensive
"It's not easy to make one of these rules, but it's a thousand times harder to get rid of one."

The brief trade war between the U.S. and Europe in the early 1960s might seem hardly worth remembering—and it pales in comparison to the political and cultural upheaval that defined that decade.
But any American who has bought a pickup truck in the past 50 years has been collateral damage in that conflict—a conflict that started because European farmers were mad about American exports of frozen chicken.
The 25 percent retaliatory tariffs that President Lyndon B. Johnson set on imported light trucks have fenced off the American pickup truck market from foreign competitors for decades. As a result of the so-called chicken tax, consumers pay higher prices, and a handful of brands have become dominant in the marketplace. The other tariffs that were part of that long-ago trade war have been repealed. This one remains.
"There are a few people highly invested in keeping it around and no one really cares to get rid of it," explains Jordan Golson, a freelance automotive journalist. When it comes to tariffs, he says, "It's not easy to make one of these rules, but it's a thousand times harder to get rid of one."
On this week's show, Golson also discusses the lengths that some foreign truck-makers have gone to in order to avoid those tariffs. That includes the story of the Subaru BRAT: a small pickup truck that was imported to America with seats installed in the truck bed—so it would be classified as a passenger vehicle rather than a cargo vehicle and, thus, exempt from the 25 percent import tax.
Daniel Griswold, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, reminds us that the chicken tax has caused real economic harm in addition to those funny, creative attempts at tariff dodging.
"The U.S. government is artificially constricting competition in that market, and that means higher prices, it means less choice," Griswold says.
Automobiles can be imported to the U.S. with tariffs of just 2.5 percent, and the result has been a far more robust market for consumers and greater foreign investment in making cars in the U.S.—something that hasn't happened in the truck market due to the trade barriers.
The chicken tax has been "a losing proposition all around for Americans, consumers, and the American economy," says Griswold. It's also a great example of how tariffs can stifle, rather than protect, domestic markets.
Further reading for this week's episode:
"Cheap American Chicken Gave Us This Weird Subaru Pickup," by Golson, Wired
"Why Are Pickups So Expensive? Blame the Chicken Tax," by Griswold, Cato Institute
"How a Tax on Chicken Changed the Playing Field for U.S. Automakers," by Sonari Glinton, NPR
Written by Eric Boehm; produced and edited by Hunt Beaty; mixing by Ian Keyser; fact checking by Katherine Sypher
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
does this tax apply to Japanese manufactured trucks made in America?
also why is this tarriff against all truck imports even Japan when the squable was with Europe. there may be more to this story
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
I have to think so too. US automakers have pretty much ceded the world market for 1/4 ton light pickups to foreign makers. You can't even get them (US made quarter-ton) here anymore. Look at television coverage of various Third World conflicts and the various combatants are all driving Toyota light trucks, but no Ford Rangers or Chevy S-10s.
That would be because the EPA in their infinite wisdom changed the CARB calcs in the Bush II era to include footprint of vehicle, with no regard to workload.
No, it does not. If the vehicle is built here (or Canada or Mexico), it is not subject to the tax. The reason we don't see smaller (1/4-ton) trucks in the US (and Canada for that matter) is that they cost almost as much to produce as the larger 1/2-ton trucks, and thus are sold for about as much as the 1/2-ton trucks. There's no profit in building and selling the 1/4-ton trucks here.
Yes price, and Americans in general just don’t want them. The mid-size now has come back though, Ford Rangers, Chevy Colorados, and Dodge Dakotas.
I prefer and drive a super cab, and they are hard to find (I buy used) along with extended cabs, let alone a standard cab, everyone seems to want crew cabs (4 doors) now.
Tarrifs are tarrifs and applied to products, not countries.
The tarrif is on pickups *imported* - hence no tarrif on Japanese trucks made domestically. And its on trucks - hence why Japanese imports are hit with it.
Tariffs are applied to products that are made in a country. They can be targeted at specific products and/or specific countries.
Which came first, the chicken tax or the egg tax?
The rooster tax came first.
All of the good-looking chicks MADE the rooster do it!
(And that's no cock-and-bull story!)
Ever notice that all you hear n Reason is that US imposed tariffs are bad? You never hear anything about the other side, about why the tariff was imposed in the first place?
Another thing is about the Constitutional restrictions on the Federal Government. About how the Income Tax goes against the Constitution or about the Federal Government having no Constitutional authority for some of the things that they do.
When the US was formed the main funding for the Federal Government was to come from two sources. Excise Taxes and Tariffs. One of the legitimate things that the Federal Government is empowered to do, is also one of the biggest complaints by some Reason writers.
If you don't want higher tariffs then you're an evil fucker who hates the Constitution.
Poor sarc
I'd settle for Congress setting tariffs instead of Executive Order - KINGS as Constitutional.
More of sarcasmic's honour and integrity.
The little troll has basically fucked his ability to claim that he doesn't sockpuppet anymore.
Unilateral free trade is good for you even if the other side doesn't reciprocate.
You get cheap goods. They get little pieces of green paper. Little pieces of green paper that don't do them any good unless, at some point, they buy something from Americans - which then hits them with their own tariffs. Otherwise the little pieces of green paper sit in a box somewhere, moldering.
Unilateral! Free! Trade! Unilateral! Free! Trade! Unilateral! Free! Trade!
It's going to be pretty hard to earn little pieces of green paper when everything is being imported because it's tax-free and domestic taxes are killing all of the USA's productivity.
Dependency is not a blessing; it's a sell out.
Trump likes tariffs which means you're a leftist if you don't. Since all leftists are evil, only evil people oppose tariffs.
Poor, pour sarc
Can’t he just drink himself to death already?
I think he's becoming immune to higher doses.
"Can’t he just drink himself to death already?"
Sarc's already got a higher alcohol content than most specimens stored in jars. I suspect he's too pickled to die and decay.
Apparently Biden likes Tariffs too dumb*ss.
Course [WE] gangsters of Democratic [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] RULES/enslaves/steals from those 'icky' people is the only principle Democrats politics revolves around. As-if that wasn't on full display with race-categorizing, sex-categorizing, status-categorizing, etc, etc, etc never-ending. Their only political enlightenment is defining and establishing who the 'icky' one's are they can conquer and consume.
Welcome to the party of 1st-Grader mentality of bullying tactics.
My personal favorite was that during Obama's time in office, the Steelworker's Unions wanted him to enact tariffs on foreign steel. Obama refused. Trump gave them the tariffs that they were begging Obama for. The Steelworker's Unions berated Trump and the tariffs. Now they are begging Biden for those tariffs. Think that one through.
It's not me. Sarcasmic is being "honourable" again.
https://reason.com/2020/01/22/trump-campaigned-on-saving-factory-jobs-but-u-s-manufacturing-just-went-through-a-year-long-recession/
Clear-cut case below, showing the UTTER FAILURE of protectionism in general, and Trumpist protectionism specifically:
Meanwhile in the real world…
https://reason.com/2019/04/22/trumps-washing-machine-tariffs-cleaned-out-consumers/
Trump’s Washing Machine Tariffs Cleaned Out Consumers
A new report finds the tariffs raised $82 million for the U.S. Treasury but ended up increasing costs for consumers by about $1.2 billion.
PROTECTIONISM DOESN’T WORK!!! DUH!!!
Protect American washing-machine makers from Chinese competition? The FIRST thing that American washing-machine makers do, is jack UP their prices… AND the prices of dryers to boot, too! To SOAK the hell out of all of us consumers!!!
From the above-linked Reason article about washing machines…
“All told, those tariffs raised about $82 million for the U.S. Treasury but ended up increasing costs for consumers by about $1.2 billion during 2018 … (deleted). Although the trade policy did cause some manufacturers to shift production from overseas to the United States in an effort to avoid the new tariffs, the 1,800 jobs created by Trump’s washing machine tariffs cost consumers an estimated $820,000 per job.”
Summary: Nickels and dimes to the USA treasury; boatloads of pain for consumers. USA jobs created? Yes, at GREAT expense! Putting these 1.8 K workers on a super-generous welfare program would have been WAY better for all the rest of us! Plus, you know the WORKERS don’t make super-huge bucks (no $820,000 per job for THEM); the goodies flow to the EXECUTIVES at the top of the washing-machine companies! The same ones who play golf with The Donald, and join him for gang-banging Stormy Daniels! Essentially at our expense!
Now show us how much domestic taxes and fake-fiat $ inflation soaked the hell out of us consumers/manufacturers/producers/laborers. Then explain (or at the very least help lobby for) how to balance the US debt.
Seems your anti-protectionism measure is, "Oh well; just bankrupt the USA."
https://reason.com/2020/11/14/will-biden-repeal-trumps-destructive-food-tariffs/
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/colored-pigments-and-complex-tools-suggest-human-trade-100000-years-earlier-previously-believed-180968499/
Colored Pigments and Complex Tools Suggest Humans Were Trading 100,000 Years Earlier Than Previously Believed
Transformations in climate and landscape may have spurred these key technological innovations
Troglodytes wishing to exercise their “punishment boners” and waging universal trade wars against everyone who is not quite Perfectly Holy Like THEY Are? Punishing ALL of the “IP thieves” and “slave workers”? Ultimately Holy-Rolling anti-trade authoritarians will NOT be happy, till we are back to the chimpanzee era, and maybe not even then!
Bigger problem with trucks are perverted fuel economy requirements based on wheelbase. A larger wheelbase permits lower fuel economy. This giant trucks that won't fit in my garage.
[Former] Reason contributor, Brendan O'Neill talks to Michael Shellenberger on the Censorship [section 5 of the FTC fair business practices act] Industrial Complex.
How CAFE Standards fuck with the Truck Market: https://youtu.be/azI3nqrHEXM?si=ziQfcp8W04FWaGoI
LMAO... "Automobiles can be imported to the U.S. with tariffs of just 2.5 percent, and the result has been a far more robust market for consumers and greater foreign investment in making cars in the U.S."
How's importing cars going to make "greater" ... "making cars in the U.S." Am I missing something there or does the writers stupidity just strike at random or what?
When the exact same technologies and parts are use in (for example) Toyota cars and trucks, then "economies of scale" apply, and USA-based expenditures help dilute foreign-based costs... "Economies of scale" apply, despite being spread around the world. Larger taxes on USA imports (even if only on some, not all, models) will hurt these "economies of scale", AKA, efficiencies, through loss of sales.
Stuff THAT in your pipe and smoke it, and you might yet become an informed, thinking economist!
Oh. So it's was a parts tariff not an automobile tariff?
Or are you just lying again like you have a complete record of doing?
Did you know that the expenses of car parts add up to create MUCH of the costs of cars? If you can strain your brain enough to understand THAT, then just MAYBE you could ALSO understand that design, testing, and compliance costs are ALSO subjected to "economies of scale"!
Here, STUDY UP instead of spreading your ignorance! https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economiesofscale.asp
The article isn't about the expense of a car from car parts or the building of cars. The article is about car tariffs.
"The 25 percent retaliatory tariffs that President Lyndon B. Johnson set on imported light trucks"
And then claiming out of thin air that "Automobiles can be imported" is suppose to equal “greater” … “making cars in the U.S.”
Don't you read well?
I can read well enough to understand that self-righteous nativist hickabilles (left, right, and center) are SOOOO stupid, that they think that TAXES (tariffs in this case) are gonna make us GOOD Americans RICH-RICH-RICH, by punishing that them thar undeserving un-American FURRINERS!!!
And there is NO evidence that this works, and LOTS of evidence that it does NOT work!
If taxes are gonna make us all rich... PLEASE send ALL of your money to Government Almighty, pronto!
For simpletons: Toyota builds cars in America. Hurt Toyota, hurt their ability to make cars in America... Even if American-built Toyotas are NOT excessively taxed (compared to imported ones). WHY do you HATE American employees of Toyota SOOOOO much?
Having a problem staying on subject? If you could get this riled up about domestic tax and correctly thrilled about Trumps tax-cuts you wouldn't be such a hypocritical dumb*ss ya know.
What if all truck beds identify as trunks?
What then?
With "trunks", there were-trucks will now be called elephants, and be even MORE heavily regulated and taxed as exotic or endangered species!
They'll hold bears, and bears can jump out and maul people at random.
Oh please. Pickups are not "nice things." Do I care if some local yokel with delusions of grandeur has to pay more for his penis substitute? Yeah, no. Take your F150 and Ram it.
I am producing 88 US dollars per-day to complete a few l services on the laptop.. I certainly did not believe that it'd be achievable , however one of my best pals collected 25,000 US dollars in five weeks by doing this job & she convinced me to join…
Explore extra updates by reaching this article >>> https://jobclub01.blogspot.com/
Great points. Real quick though, the case about Chuck Taylors being classified as slippers may not be true. Here's a thread on that from a few years ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/ax86ev/til_new_converse_chuck_taylor_allstar_sneakers/
How cute that you think anybody buys pickups for anything but lifestyle these days, where higher prices are status symbols. I'm baffled that BMW doesn't make a pickup truck (2025 rumors not withstanding).