New Draft Article: The Two Tests of Search Law
There are two tests for what is a Fourth Amendment search. But what are they?
There are two tests for what is a Fourth Amendment search. But what are they?
My new book is now available.
A few thoughts on a pending cert petition.
From State v. Barnes, a new decision from the Ohio Court of Appeals.
You have to wait until January for the physical book, but you can read the electronic version now.
Explaining a puzzle.
Featuring comments from Joshua Windham, and my response.
An update in United States v. Chatrie, with a thought on modern Fourth Amendment litigation.
So holds the Second Circuit, in a new decision.
What is a "house"?
Filed this week in United States v. Smith.
My book will be out January 10th, but you can pre-order it now.
An important case on the particularity of digital-evidence warrants.
A debate on a very important Fourth Amendment ruling.
With a petition for review now pending before the Supreme Court of California.
An astonishing ruling, and one that creates splits on two differerent issues.
It's a weird case, but Robinson's death before the case was heard is old news.
I'm with Sam and Will.
A notable dynamic, and one worth trying to explain.
The first of two rulings, and why I find it unpersuasive.
An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"
A response to Josh.
A thought.
A reply to Steve.
A response to Steve Calabresi.
A new lecture on a recurring topic.
A follow-up to my post last year on the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.
"If you go in there without probable cause it will be an illegal search, you know that."
We should wait until we know what (if anything) is happening.
A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. Carson from the Michigan Court of Appeals.
A thought on the old days.
Now out in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
Reposting a thought I had after the Fifth Circuit's decision.
A different take.
One track became two.
Revisiting Posner's 2007 essay.
But how close is close enough? No one knows.
A response to Josh Blackman on the new Texas immigration enforcement law.
And the leak likely did not "lock in" anything.
Unlocking phones may reach SCOTUS, but there's a potential catch.
Code is law, they say.
United States v. Chatrie is heard in the Fourth Circuit.
Good riddance.
An important new case on reverse keyword search warrants raises a Fourth Amendment puzzle.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10