My Experience as a Law Professor Juror
I did it, and I recommend it.
I did it, and I recommend it.
The final version of my new article has been published.
A thought in response to Josh.
The Fourth Amendment returns.
This one is a search.
Allowing the Administration's program to continue, although not creating any new Fourth Amendment law.
My tips for 1Ls, now up on Youtube.
Tracing the doctrine back.
A long preview is now available on Youtube.
A debate between Volokh bloggers.
"How do you know she's a witch?"
You're reading Jack Goldsmith, right?
Now up to date.
"What is the Jones Test, and What Does That Say About Katz?"
Fifteen judges produce eight separate opinions—but no view gets a majority.
For those who listen to their books rather than read them.
"The Case for Non-Confirmation"
A second post on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"
The first in a series about "The Digital Fourth Amendment."
Trying to figure out a reported new legal argument.
A useful overview.
Just posted to SSRN.
A new development in the Eric Adams case.
There are two tests for what is a Fourth Amendment search. But what are they?
My new book is now available.
A few thoughts on a pending cert petition.
From State v. Barnes, a new decision from the Ohio Court of Appeals.
You have to wait until January for the physical book, but you can read the electronic version now.
Explaining a puzzle.
Featuring comments from Joshua Windham, and my response.
An update in United States v. Chatrie, with a thought on modern Fourth Amendment litigation.
So holds the Second Circuit, in a new decision.
What is a "house"?
Filed this week in United States v. Smith.
My book will be out January 10th, but you can pre-order it now.
An important case on the particularity of digital-evidence warrants.
A debate on a very important Fourth Amendment ruling.
With a petition for review now pending before the Supreme Court of California.
An astonishing ruling, and one that creates splits on two differerent issues.
It's a weird case, but Robinson's death before the case was heard is old news.
I'm with Sam and Will.
A notable dynamic, and one worth trying to explain.
The first of two rulings, and why I find it unpersuasive.
An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"
A response to Josh.
A thought.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks