So You're About to Start Law School: An Incoming Law Student's Guide
My tips for 1Ls, now up on Youtube.
My tips for 1Ls, now up on Youtube.
Tracing the doctrine back.
A long preview is now available on Youtube.
A debate between Volokh bloggers.
"How do you know she's a witch?"
You're reading Jack Goldsmith, right?
Now up to date.
"What is the Jones Test, and What Does That Say About Katz?"
Fifteen judges produce eight separate opinions—but no view gets a majority.
For those who listen to their books rather than read them.
"The Case for Non-Confirmation"
A second post on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"
The first in a series about "The Digital Fourth Amendment."
Trying to figure out a reported new legal argument.
A useful overview.
Just posted to SSRN.
A new development in the Eric Adams case.
There are two tests for what is a Fourth Amendment search. But what are they?
My new book is now available.
A few thoughts on a pending cert petition.
From State v. Barnes, a new decision from the Ohio Court of Appeals.
You have to wait until January for the physical book, but you can read the electronic version now.
Explaining a puzzle.
Featuring comments from Joshua Windham, and my response.
An update in United States v. Chatrie, with a thought on modern Fourth Amendment litigation.
So holds the Second Circuit, in a new decision.
What is a "house"?
Filed this week in United States v. Smith.
My book will be out January 10th, but you can pre-order it now.
An important case on the particularity of digital-evidence warrants.
A debate on a very important Fourth Amendment ruling.
With a petition for review now pending before the Supreme Court of California.
An astonishing ruling, and one that creates splits on two differerent issues.
It's a weird case, but Robinson's death before the case was heard is old news.
I'm with Sam and Will.
A notable dynamic, and one worth trying to explain.
The first of two rulings, and why I find it unpersuasive.
An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"
A response to Josh.
A thought.
A reply to Steve.
A response to Steve Calabresi.
A new lecture on a recurring topic.
A follow-up to my post last year on the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.
"If you go in there without probable cause it will be an illegal search, you know that."