Barr will step down tomorrow. Rosen will be Acting Attorney General. Who is next in line?
"EMT Who Gave CPR to Man Possibly Infected With COVID-19 on Flight Says He Has Virus Symptoms"
Every word should serve a purpose, and that word should be in the right place.
(1) Run out the clock, (2) improve field position, (3) special team forces a turnover, and (4) the fake punt.
Would this rule be valid under Employment Division v. Smith?
The majority suggested that preventing the Secretary of Commerce from informing the President about census data could "implicate" the Opinions Clause
I suspect the Court punted this Kentucky COVID case to avoid jumping the gun on Fulton.
Roberts's self-professed humility depends on everyone being too dumb to see what he is really doing.
At least one Clinton appointee is waiting to see the Senate breakdown before stepping down.
The scope of religious exemptions, based on TWA v. Hardison, may be in flux.
Or, Trump covenanted that Orangeacre shall not be used for residential purposes.
The 8-member Supreme Court gave the federal District Court once last chance. Will the Chief finally find a stay is warranted? Or will the Court grant cert before judgment, knowing the Biden administration will moot the case?
The panel instructed the district court to "preliminarily enjoin the State from imposing attendance limitations on in-person services in houses of worship that are less favorable than 25% of the fire-code capacity."
The Kagan-three dissents on the former, not on the latter. The Chief is silent.
A federal judge in Wisconsin found that there was "not a significant or material departure from legislative direction." But what if there was such a departure?
President Trump doesn't like standing doctrine, and thinks that Justice Alito and Thomas ruled for him.
Could the Chief bring everyone together for a single merits ruling in a short time?
President Biden could adjourn Congress to make recess appointments. Or Vice President Harris could simply refuse to recognize Senator McConnell as majority leader
The District Court refused to even schedule a timely hearing. Now the parties have gone back to SCOTUS.
There is no option to pay a fine rather than receiving the vaccination.
The ABA, and defenders of the rule, now have to contend with a reasoned decision that faithfully applies Supreme Court precedents.
Three of the most important Supreme Court decisions apparently needed reboots.
For a sitting judge, there are risks of leaving the bench and entering the political fray.
Will the former California AG have to recuse from all ACA-litigation initiated by participated in?
If California bans safe, outdoor dining, more people will eat together in unsafe, undistanced homes.
Did Alito not recognize the significance of making the response due after the safe harbor date? Or did another justice threaten to dissent over the timing?
Trump-appointed Judges consistently rule against President Trump in election cases.
The U.K. Exempted From Its Travel Restrictions people whose activity "creates or preserves 50+ UK jobs"
Justice Alito effectively denies Pennsylvania emergency appeal by calling for response after Electoral Count Act "Safe Harbor Date"
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks