'I Relied on Others,' 'Documents Were Filed in the Wrong Place,' and Other Memorable Excuses
The year's highlights in blame shifting.
The year's highlights in blame shifting.
Ballots should be counted quickly and accurately.
His lawyers say no jury can ever consider charges based on his "official acts" as president, which include his efforts to reverse Joe Biden's election.
The Colorado Supreme Court's reasoning in deciding that Trump is constitutionally disqualified from running for president seems iffy.
The former Trump lawyer could have avoided a massive defamation verdict by presenting his "definitively clear" evidence of election fraud.
Ballots should be counted quickly and accurately.
The former Trump campaign lawyer re-upped his false claims about two Georgia election workers in the middle of a trial aimed at determining the damages he owes them.
The article makes the case for disqualification on moral and pragmatic grounds, as well as legal ones.
A D.C. Circuit judge says the government’s defense of the order gives short shrift to "the First Amendment’s vigorous protection of political speech."
The court ruled against Trump on his strongest arguments, but accepted a weak one.
The former White House chief of staff is one of several former Trump advisers who are cooperating with prosecutors.
Johnson is a relative newcomer to Congress who has never even chaired a committee, and he is a close ally of former President Donald Trump.
Plus: Greta Thunberg gets booted from Israeli schools, Spain gets even less serious about work, regulating skyline views, and more...
The election conspiracy theorist struck a deal that allows her to avoid prison by testifying for the prosecution.
District Attorney Fani Willis’ preferred weapon wasn’t designed to be used this way.
If false beliefs about legality exempt people from Section 3 disqualification, leading Confederates would have been exempt as well.
The debate aired on the Mehdi Hasan show.
The opposing view is contrary to the original meaning, and leads to absurd conclusions.
The two alleged racketeers complain that irrelevant evidence concerning distinct, uncoordinated conduct aimed at keeping Donald Trump in office will impair their defense.
Plus: New York City's crackdown on short-term rentals, Brazil's UFO investigations, and more...
Plus: A listener question concerning porn verification laws.
Special Counsel Jack Smith reportedly is keenly interested in whether the former New York mayor gave Trump legal advice while intoxicated.
Plus: A listener question about the continued absurdity of sports stadium subsidies
Mug shots are not taken to humiliate a defendant before they've been convicted. But that's the purpose they widely serve now.
It's no mystery why the former president preferred a forum in which his record and positions would face no serious challenge.
Trump and his acolytes' conduct was indefensible, but the state's RICO law is overly broad and makes it too easy for prosecutors to bring charges.
Trump's Georgia indictment has much in common with the most recent federal case against him. But also breaks some new ground.
The defendants will claim their alleged "racketeering activity" was a sincere effort to rectify election fraud.
Plus: The beauty of microschools, the futility of link taxes, and more...
I was one of the critics he responded to, and in this post I offer a rejoinder.
End the government’s plea-bargaining racket with open and adversarial jury trials.
Giving presidents impunity for using force and fraud to try to nullify election results is far worse than any potential risk of prosecuting Trump.
When he alleged fraud and sought help from government officials, they say, Trump was exercising rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Plus: Why don't journalists support free speech anymore?
Recent articles by Lawfare and Walter Olson perform a valuable service on this front.
His state of mind when he tried to overturn the outcome of the 2020 election remains a mystery, perhaps even to him.
The new federal charges against Trump depend on the assumption that his claims were "knowingly false."
Plus: More "manifesting prostitution" nonsense, U.S. loses top-tier credit rating, and more...
His attempt to stay in power despite losing an election is well worthy of prosecution and punishment, on grounds of retribution and deterrence.
Special prosecutor Jack Smith says Trump attempted to "defraud the United States."
Unlike calling Trump's stolen-election fantasy "the Big Lie," his lawyer's statements were demonstrably false assertions of fact.
New research on Facebook before the 2020 election finds scant evidence to suggest algorithms are shifting our political views.
Appeals in the January 6 cases raise serious questions about how broadly the statute should be applied.
Republicans who participated in the scheme say they relied on legal advice grounded in historical precedent.
The alleged state and federal felonies involve intent elements that may be difficult to prove.
Eager for the adulation of Trump supporters, the former Fox News host suggests that rigged election software delivered a phony victory to Joe Biden.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10