How Much Will Trump's Tariffs Cost?
Much of the detail remains to be worked out, but lawmakers and corporations are already preparing.
Much of the detail remains to be worked out, but lawmakers and corporations are already preparing.
Despite decades of bipartisan attempts, industrial policy keeps failing to deliver on promises from both the left and the right.
Under Khan's leadership, the Federal Trade Commission has been bad for business and bad for consumers.
In the Abolish Everything issue, Reason writers make the case for ending the Fed, the Army, Social Security, and everything else.
A ballot initiative to create a new category of medical providers for animals is winning approval, though votes are still being counted.
A related initiative preventing the state's most prolific rent control–supporting nonprofit from funding future initiatives is headed for a narrow victory.
Victory in the fight for cheaper housing, a more liberal land-use regime, and greater property rights won't come from the White House.
We don't know how Kamala Harris would wield her awesome power, and we don't know how the rule of law would constrain Donald Trump.
Voters say they want to "stop the madness." Expect the madness to continue.
In this Texas Law Review article, Josh Braver and I argue that most exclusionary zoning violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
No matter who wins, we can expect bad policies surrounding sex and especially surrounding technology.
These two candidates can't even be trusted to explain their own ideas.
California would benefit from building more housing and having more experimentation with how public services are delivered.
Links to all my writings on these topics.
Dave Smith is for Trump. Jacob Grier is for Harris. David Stockman says we're screwed either way.
Plus: Kamala Harris' closing argument, the FTC's harassment of Musk-owned Twitter, and more
Proposition 33 would repeal all of California's state-level limits on rent control. It's passage could prove to be a disaster for housing supply in the Golden State.
For decades, the Jones Act has increased costs and hurt grid reliability in Puerto Rico.
A new IMF study finds that a global increase in tariffs could decrease global GDP by nearly 1 percent by 2025 and over 1 percent by 2026.
From taxes to special loans to price gouging, the Trump and Harris campaigns have engaged in a race to see who can pander hardest.
In 2021 Trump called bitcoin a "scam" but he seems to have realized his political coalition includes cryptocurrency enthusiasts.
City officials are threatening to invoke the "Modell Law" to prevent a potential move to a new facility in Brook Park.
The state's powerful coastal land-use regulator is arguing its awesome development-stopping powers applies to rocket launches as well as housing.
While I am eager for the Court to take another public use case, I am actually happy the justices chose to reject this one. Its unusual facts made it a poor vehicle for revisiting Kelo v. City of New London.
The Jones Act makes the North Slope’s resources inaccessible to the state’s energy-starved residents.
As with Biden, you can count on Harris to expand government programs.
But consumers will pay a price.
Urban renewal efforts should recognize that existing businesses and new residents can coexist.
Advocates unconvincingly argue that repealing California's limits on rent control will open up more housing for people with disabilities.
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
For more than three decades, the Institute for Justice has shown that economic freedom and private property are essential safeguards for ordinary Americans.
Despite homelessness being on the rise, local governments keep cracking down on efforts to shelter those without permanent housing.
Instead of focusing on the ways a rollback of zoning laws could lower housing costs for everyone, Vance wants to zealously enforce zoning codes to keep Haitians out of town.
Similar price hikes would hit smartphones, laptops, tablets, and televisions.
As hurricane damage mounts, the government is buying—and sometimes seizing—homes in flood-prone areas, sparking concerns over property rights and accusations of discrimination.
A free market for housing is one that benefits both renters and landlords.
Federal housing officials allege a New Hampshire landlord violated the Fair Housing Act for refusing to show a unit to two women with emotional support dogs.
The candidate’s protectionism offsets some otherwise positive tax ideas.
Harris is running away from her far-left past.
Plus: Massachusetts NIMBYs get their day in court, Pittsburgh one-step forward, two-steps back approach to zoning reform, and a surprisingly housing-heavy VP debate.
To give storm victims the best chance at recovery, let local knowledge and markets guide decisions.
Harris rightly calls out regulations for causing the housing shortage, but she also supports rent control policies that will make it worse.
Why is making spirits for personal use any of the government’s business in the first place?
Eliminate the domestic content requirements of the Buy American Act, don't expand them.
Progressives are trying to fix the errors of the past, but they're ignoring the best solution: More robust property rights.
A significant percentage of Native Americans don't even have electricity—thanks in part to reservations being subject to overwhelming bureaucracy.
Housing is unaffordable because regulations have prevented its commodification.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks