Trump Wages War Wherever and Whenever He Wants
The unauthorized attack on Syria shows Congress won't enforce limits on the president's military powers.
The unauthorized attack on Syria shows Congress won't enforce limits on the president's military powers.
You don't have to be an originalist to conclude that the Constitution requires congressional authorization for war.
A small-scale strike might be constitutional even without congressional support. But it is also likely to be useless, much like last year's missile strike turned out to be. Large-scale military action of the sort that could make a real difference, requires advance congressional authorization.
The brief, which I coauthored on behalf of myself and six other legal scholars explains why the Bill of Rights constrains federal power over immigration no less than other types of federal power.
Many people fear that John Bolton and Donald Trump might start an unnecessary war. But such fears would be unnecessary if Congress were to reclaims it power to initiate war.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that the ban violates the First Amendment because it is intended to discriminate against Muslims.
No robots need apply.
Trump's awful rhetoric is a menace to liberty - even when it does not lead to any immediate action.
Our institutions are strong enough to restrain a president, but they're also strong enough to empower him.
Friday A/V Club: Columnist, broadcaster, and critic of concentrated power
If you look past the shouting and the narcissism, there are clear signs that Trump doesn't have as much power as we all want or fear.
Some surprising insights and historical curiosities from past presidents at their one-year marks
The Court's decision to take the case is not surprising. It could potentially result in a very important decision addressing the scope of presidential power over immigration.
In his first year, Donald Trump took presidential blame shifting to new heights.
The court concluded that the travel ban exceeds the scope of presidential authority and violates immigration laws enacted by Congress.
A prominent constitutional law scholar highlights the perils of wars waged without congressional authorization - a practice engaged in by Obama and now perpetuated by Trump.
Contrary to his reputation (and Twitter feed), the president has been selectively trimming executive power.
The ATF has no legal authority to restrict the controversial firearm accessory.
Corker is a longtime defender of American intervention and war in the Middle East, and now wants to supply billions in weapons to the Saudis and Ukraine.
The hit cartoon depicts how out of control presidential power has gotten.
The president did not need Venezuela and North Korea to make his order constitutional.
A Senate vote shows that even Trump critics are happy to let the president use the military as he pleases.
Scrapping DACA is a callous act that'll hurt the country.
Instead of striving to ingratiate himself with those who hold his fate in their hands, the president seems determined to antagonize them.
Irrational, half-baked anti-terrorist policies are not necessarily unconstitutional.
An appeals court upholds an injunction against the president's travel ban but once again leaves him perfectly free to improve screening.
Intent on blocking visitors from Muslim-majority countries, the president confuses political incorrectness with seriousness.
Which is more important to the president: hurting Muslims or looking tough on terrorism?
The checks and challenges invited by the president's "serial recklessness" should be welcomed.
His recklessness doesn't necessarily weaken the executive branch. In fact the opposite may be true.
Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee need to step up their oversight game
Unlike his predecessor, Trump has not even done us the courtesy of coming up with a laughable excuse.
The heart of the potential for conflicts of interests is not the Trump business empire. It's the presidential power to steer benefits to particular interests.
The nation's father warned against "hyper-partisanship, excessive debt and foreign wars" in 1796. Why aren't we paying attention, asks John Avlon.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
What's happening on day two of Neil Gorsuch's SCOTUS confirmation hearings.
What the Senate Judiciary Committee should ask the Supreme Court candidate.
Reports show possible loosening of restrictions on strikes, more CIA participation.
The order reportedly exempts visa holders and Iraqis as well as legal permanent residents.
Why Paul Ryan was clapping at policies he's long opposed, how POTUS could be a strong de-regulator, and why the media cares 100x more about presidential theatrics than the war in Yemen
Every problem can be solved, except the problem of presidential grandiosity.
Sorting through Neil Gorsuch, the travel ban cases and more, with Reason's resident court watcher
The Hollywood star's self-dramatizing self-righteousness plays right into the president's hands.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks