Pete Hegseth Can't Explain Why America Needs a $1.5 Trillion Military Budget
Sen. Mark Kelly says it "feels like that number was just kind of pulled out of thin air."
Sen. Mark Kelly says it "feels like that number was just kind of pulled out of thin air."
Should it take more than a 5–4 vote for the Supreme Court to strike down a federal law?
The 6th Circuit upheld that 158-year-old law, while the 5th Circuit concluded it could not be justified as a revenue measure.
With March Madness expansion and a possible College Football Playoff expansion, the NCAA is ignoring fans right when its popularity matters most in Congress.
The party of fiscal responsibility strikes again.
An initiative that would streamline California's development-killing environmental review law appears to be headed to the ballot.
Congress hasn't voted to declare war since 1942, yet the legislative branch constantly refuses to rein in presidents.
Plus: Supreme Court pauses ban on mail-order abortion pills, TikTok's artistic merit, a defense of pickup artists, and more...
Legally, Trump must either cease operations or ask Congress for approval. He did neither, and Congress just went on recess.
Bootleggers, Baptists, and the fight over who gets to write America's self-driving car rules.
Department of Homeland Security
Plus: FISA reauthorization, driverless trucks in California, and an Epstein suicide note.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
“The sale of E15 year-round would help the ethanol industry and no one else,” says one agricultural policy expert.
The brief, which asks a federal judge to reconsider an injunction blocking the project, reads like it was transcribed from the president's Truth Social account.
To justify punishing a legislator for his speech, a FIRE brief notes, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth relies on a Supreme Court precedent that is clearly inapposite.
Sen. Ron Wyden warns that Americans would be “stunned” at how officials have used the law.
Republicans picked this fight, and Democrats responded by drawing some egregiously gerrymandered districts. In the end, voters lose.
Plus: Tit-for-tat gerrymandering, D.C.'s flowing fountains, more war in the Strait of Hormuz, and more...
Democrats can't muster the votes to impeach and remove Trump, or even to stop an illegal war. The 25th Amendment would be even more difficult.
Silencing "Fighting Bob" details how the government targeted anti-war critics like Sen. Robert La Follette.
The defense secretary's asserted authority to control the speech of retired military officers "would chill public participation by veterans," a brief supporting Mark Kelly warns.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss Eric Swalwell's fall from grace and how tax day radicalizes us every year.
Plus: The House passes a short-term FISA extension, Ron Wyden urges fellow Senate Democrats to oppose a "clean" bill, and Norway gets robot buses.
What is a greater rejection of America's founding ideals than an overreaching government trampling the First Amendment?
As lawmakers of both major parties hustle to regulate their preferred villains, they're losing sight of the big picture. The possible gains to humanity from AI are enormous.
It would be easy to wave it away and move on. But that's how the U.S. got in such a dire fiscal situation.
The feeling is perfectly consistent: Graham feels it should be as easy as possible for the U.S. to start a war, and as hard as possible to end one.
"No statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon concluded when he enjoined the project.
There are far too few checks left on executive power.
The proposal is "an enormous waste of taxpayer dollars and would make Americans less, not more, safe." Thankfully, Congress is unlikely to adopt it.
There is no voting crisis that demands federal intervention.
The Trump administration keeps trying to find legal loopholes, but the will of the people is the final judge of any major policy.
The bill would not only codify Trump's actions into law, it would establish a framework for both this and future administrations to do it too.
A war by any other name must still be authorized by Congress.
Rep. Jimmy Panetta says Democrats have "learned the hard way" that handing over so much tariff authority to the executive branch is a bad idea.
The president is much less concerned about the law's potential for overreach now that he's in charge of the government wielding it.
Lawmakers used to offset its emergency spending. They don't anymore.
The ability to get home should not be a privilege contingent on the political moment.
With the Pentagon's track record, lawmakers are right to be skeptical.
In a letter to senators, the administration offered five concessions—two of which were simply that going forward, officers would follow the law.
Plus: An effective build-to-rent ban advances in Congress and Florida expands one of the country's most successful zoning reforms.
Plus: bad arguments in favor of a build-to-rent ban, a tanker plane crash kills four in Iraq, signs the Iran war isn't going so well, and more...
Plus: Donald Trump vs. Thomas Massie, Republicans preparing to kill the filibuster for a very dumb reason, explosions in the Strait of Hormuz, and more...
Plus: Pete Hegseth spends millions on lobster tail and rib-eye steak, oil prices go for another roller-coaster ride, no inflation increase, and more...
A sad commentary on the sprawling size and eye-watering cost of the government.
The Court's law-declaration approach not only departs from its dispute-resolution premise but risks yielding a faulty product.
The Supreme Court's approaches of assuming agency authority to issue legislative rules and of prohibiting Congress from delegating to itself have resulted in an enormous transfer of power to the Executive.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks