Trump's New Budget Is Another Blueprint for Big Spending
We don't need more of the same. We need evidence of a serious turnaround.
We don't need more of the same. We need evidence of a serious turnaround.
As he shifts his focus away from DOGE, he acknowledges the need for hard choices and congressional action.
Impoundment, line-item vetoes, and the tricky problem of cutting spending through the executive branch
Sen. Rand Paul's attempt to end the non-existent economic emergency failed to pass the Senate on Wednesday night.
Presidential power must stem from the Constitution or a statute, and the tariffs imposed by President Trump are unauthorized by statute, making them both unlawful and unconstitutional.
Congress just approved a new online censorship scheme under the auspices of thwarting revenge porn and AI-generated "nonconsensual intimate visual depictions."
If voters so overwhelmingly prefer younger candidates, why are they underrepresented in politics?
Republicans often call for cutting off the funds but have never actually done the deed. Here's why this time might—might—be different.
That's the highest total outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, and now Congress wants to borrow even more.
"I said now that they're banning it, I want to join, just because they're telling me I can't," the Kentucky senator tells Reason.
Families described not being told their loved one was in the hospital or even when they had died.
Bills introduced Tuesday in the House and Senate would terminate the emergency declaration Trump issued last week.
The president is raising taxes, hiking prices, and creating supply chain chaos. Congress should act quickly to stop this.
A small but growing bipartisan movement in the Senate is pushing back against the president's imposition of tariffs, but there's plenty of room to go further.
The bill faces an uncertain future, but it is a faint glimmer of hope for those hoping to limit executive power over trade.
"Everything looks like a conspiracy when you don't know how anything works," said Jankowicz.
Donald Trump is determined to make everything from Canadian whiskey to Mexican avocados more expensive. Can anyone stop him?
The White House accidentally leaked military plans in Yemen to a journalist—and demonstrated how unconstitutional U.S. war making has become.
While he can't get rid of the department outright, a new executive order attempts the next best thing.
The president says those legislators are "subject to investigation at the highest level," notwithstanding their pardons and the Speech or Debate Clause.
Plus: A listener asks the editors whether a Kamala Harris presidency would have been preferable.
The cowardice of Congress will continue fueling the growth of executive power.
Every cut helps, but that's not where the money is.
FCC v. Consumers’ Research could dismantle a massive slush fund run by unelected regulators and industry insiders.
Reform could replace an unsustainable boondoggle with lower costs, more freedom, and better care.
Entitlements are a much bigger expense, but that doesn't mean the waste doesn't matter.
Handouts to corporations distort the market, breed corruption, and politicize the economy.
If only they were as big as the list of new spending.
The tariffs Trump has already imposed on Canada, Mexico, and China will cost an estimated $142 billion this year—and he says more are on the way.
Means-test Social Security, raise the retirement age, and let us invest our own money.
If the Department of Government Efficiency goes about this the wrong way, we could be left with both a presidency on steroids and no meaningful reduction in government.
At the current rate of inflation, the dollar will lose 33 cents of purchasing power within a decade.
A useful example of how meaningful regulatory reform requires legislative action--and not just the passage of Congressional Review Act resolutions.
"If the Republican budget passes, the deficit gets worse, not better," says Rep. Thomas Massie. He's right.
The president is positioning himself to have much greater control over a smaller, enfeebled federal bureaucracy.
It tries to offset as much as $4.8 trillion—mostly for tax cut extensions—with only $1.5 trillion in supposed spending reductions.
His position is grounded in concerns about the separation of powers that presidents of both major parties have raised for many years.
Plus: A listener asks the editors to guess if the real reason Donald Trump is so passionate about tariffs is because he sees them as a deal-making tool rather than a purely economic instrument.
The federal leviathan can’t be dismantled by executive action alone. To truly cut spending and rein in the bureaucracy, the administration needs buy-in from the branch that built it.
Even if the Department of Government Efficiency eliminates all improper payments and fraud, we'll still be facing a debt explosion—which requires structural reform.
It's a good sign that the president is calling on critics of the federal government's lack of transparency to staff his administration.
The bill would permanently schedule fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I drugs—and impede therapeutic research.
Much cutting. Very waste. But the Department of Government Efficiency might not have the legal and budgetary chops to actually reduce spending.
Almost exactly one year after Congress swore off self-inflicted fiscal crises, we're back to the same tired theatrics.
Billions of dollars in government revenue is a no-brainer.
In four years, Biden issued regulations costing an estimated $1.8 trillion, by far the highest total in American history.
A law passed in 2022 requires the president to give Congress a "substantive rationale" for removing inspectors general. Trump has not done that.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10