Is it Unconstitutional for States to "Discriminate" Against the Federal Government?
This is one of the questions that may well arise in Jeff Sessions' new lawsuit against California's sanctuary laws.
This is one of the questions that may well arise in Jeff Sessions' new lawsuit against California's sanctuary laws.
Immigration, federalism, and the 10th Amendment
The Justice Department wants to block three laws that it says hamper immigration enforcement.
Reason editors dispute presidential notion that "trade wars are good, and easy to win," and also argue over the Oscars.
Device makers would be required to block porn, prostitution hubs, and all content that fails "current standards of decency."
Disney allegedly lobbied against the bill behind the scenes.
Indefinite detention carried the day in Jennings v. Rodriguez, but the ruling affirms an important principle that may eventually kill the practice.
El Paso Democrat, trying to change Texas from red to blue, talks about guns, weed, and how we've already got "record safety and security on our border"
The bill makes "promoting prostitution" a federal crime, holds websites legally liable for user-posted content, and lets states retroactively prosecute offenders.
Ricardo Palacios is fighting for his right to be left alone.
If we want to solve the doctor shortage, we should import more foreign physicians.
Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, Robby Soave and Nick Gillespie talk gun violence, immigration politics, Russian electoral interference, and Black Panther.
ICE and border patrol agents want access to NSA intel obtained without warrants.
His amnesty proposal is the least draconian plan around right now
He's not the most natural standardbearer for the cause of turning around the Trump GOP's animus toward immigration.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that the ban violates the First Amendment because it is intended to discriminate against Muslims.
The president's plan would slash legal immigration by as much as half, the most drastic cut in nearly a century.
He is trying to get foreign techies to self deport or not come at all.
And Donald Trump just might be the president to give ICE free rein.
Our institutions are strong enough to restrain a president, but they're also strong enough to empower him.
He has launched a two-front assault on high-skilled foreign talent
In a series of protests, strip club workers and their allies are pushing back against abusive policing.
Minneapolis is being transformed into a police state.
Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach would prefer to upend the Constitution's directive to apportion House seats based on total population, not voter rolls. So barring that, the author of Mitt Romney's "self-deportation" policy wants Census-takers to ask about citizenship.
Restrictionists are inflaming public opinion to justify a harsh crackdown
Conflating illegal immigration in general with criminal gangs is wrong, and will lead to bad, wasteful, damaging immigration policy.
So it's come to this.
We can fantasize, can't we?
If everything problematic is evil, silencing and punishing everything problematic becomes a social necessity.
Working toward a de-presidentified future while trying to imagine an immigration deal that isn't awful
The Securing America's Future Act is a nativist nightmare.
Think immigration crackdowns don't affect you? You're wrong.
Residents are fleeing Connecticut at a rate of nearly 30,000 per year, but the state's ability to attract foreigners has cushioned the blow.
It'll throw millions more immigrants under the bus than it'll save.
My new Penn Regulatory Review article explains why widespread claims that Trump is a deregulator are undermined by his immigration policies, which include increases in regulation that outweigh reductions he may have achieved elsewhere.
They also arrested her younger friend for prostitution.
Their poison pill demands are making a deal nearly impossible.
If you hear "papers, please" on a Greyhound, thank the Supreme Court.
The federal "shutdown" doesn't lead to anarchy. It won't even lead to less government spending.
The Court's decision to take the case is not surprising. It could potentially result in a very important decision addressing the scope of presidential power over immigration.
A new report documents the Border Patrol's interference with humanitarian work.
Like millions of Americans but with more emojis, the convicted/commuted leaker and would-be senator has views that don't fit neatly into our two-party mold.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10