3-Parent Babies Born Healthy in the U.K.
The FDA blocked a similar successful treatment for mitochondrial disease a quarter of century ago.
The FDA blocked a similar successful treatment for mitochondrial disease a quarter of century ago.
A genomics PhD and conservative bioethicist debate the ethics of in vitro fertilization and discuss recent scientific advancements in reproductive medicine.
Plus: Trump's travel ban, NYC mayor candidate cites bad stats on child hunger, and more...
It's not to further their careers, says Motherhood on Ice author Marcia C. Inhorn.
An experiment with staggering implications for the future of human reproduction.
The process "reduces the duration of treatment cycles to just three days" and "replaces 80% of hormone injections required with traditional IVF," Gameto says.
Plus: The Senate wrestles with IVF funding, a dictator dies, and SpaceX passengers conduct the first-ever private spacewalk.
Each candidate made some good points about reproductive freedom and each told some major whoppers.
Plus: Kamala Harris' big night, Japan ignores climate critics, Rio cops lose their minds, and more...
The party platform previously called for a constitutional amendment to protect unborn children. Now, it says abortion should be left to the states.
Evolutionary psychologist Diana Fleischman discusses IVF, artificial genetic selection, and her unique take on the Ethan Hawke/Uma Thurman movie, Gattaca.
It's the contraception mandate in reverse, with no exception for religious employers.
Plus: Illegal homes in California, Erdogan's party does poorly in local elections, and more...
Plus: Vanderbilt activists' 911 call, Kevorkianniversary, MAID problems, and more...
After the Alabama Supreme Court ruled in February that frozen embryos were children, legislators scrambled to protect in vitro fertilization clinics.
Two-thirds of Americans oppose the Alabama ruling that claims frozen embryos are equivalent to children.
State Supreme Court Chief Justice Tom Parker cited the Bible to explain why.
In vitro gametogenesi could allow same-sex couples, post-menopausal women, and couples experiencing infertility to have children.
Plus: Diminishing differences in regional attitudes, IRS begins monitoring small transactions, and more…
IVF at "significant risk"
It would be deeply immoral to require parents to select for particular traits, but it is also wrong to deny them the chance to make life easier for their children.
Flinging around such terms is not helpful and does not advance the debate.
There is no compelling ethical reason to limit this exercise of reproductive liberty.
Will most babies be created using in vitro gametogenesis in 40 years?
Due to FDA ban parents must resort to treatments abroad in order to have a healthy baby
Why should not men be eligible for uterine transplants?
So argues Eugene Volokh, albeit with a bit more subtlety.
A contract is a contract, but a more generous spirit might relent
Permissionless innovation works best for both scientific and moral progress.
Naturally the usual bioluddites are eager to stop progress.
Just because it's new doesn't mean that it's wrong.
Recent advances in uterus transplantation will soon make this possible
GenePeeks aids parents in their quest for healthier babies by reducing the odds of structural or genetic birth defects.
The bioethics of in vitro fertilization and birth defects
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks