New York's Climate 'Superfund' Is Costly, Arbitrary, and Unconstitutional
Increasing energy costs in New York will not significantly address climate change.
Increasing energy costs in New York will not significantly address climate change.
Arcane tax rules based on carbonation levels are flattening the growth of America's craft cider industry.
How to declare a ceasefire in the carbon tariff wars.
Studies are mixed on whether or not it will make a difference.
A review of Climate Liberalism: Perspectives on Liberty, Property & Pollution at Law & Liberty.
Joe Biden could take advantage of the expanded executive authority over trade that Donald Trump helped create.
A new study examines what happened in British Columbia, while a second looks at how to ensure "revenue neutrality."
Another appellate court recognizes that federal courts lack jurisdiction to consider legal challenges to the Biden Administration's Social Cost of Carbon estimates.
Top-down mandates will only slow down the energy transition.
If there is an urgent need for emission reductions, regulatory ossification and legal risks counsel the consideration of other approaches, such as a carbon tax.
Parsing technology trends, policy proposals, and clean tax cuts
Taking meaningful steps to reduce carbon emissions requires recognizing that the market is smarter than bureaucrats in Washington.
Business support for sensible climate policy appears to be growing.
Clean technologies can compete (and win) if barriers to participation are removed.
Current evidence points toward a significantly warmer world by the end of the century. This will have substantial impacts on human life.
Slowing or stopping economic growth will only delay solving the problems caused by man-made warming.
Jerry Taylor on why he now considers climate change a serious problem.
No, our kids will not be doomed in 12 years if we don't adopt her Green New Deal.
Using climate change as an excuse to pursue other social and economic goals.
Raising the price of gasoline, heat, and electricity is a steep political hill to climb.
Ordinary people aren't willing to pay higher costs just to fulfill the grand visions of environmentalists.
Did voters recognize it as a green pork-barrel scheme?
Very little carbon reduction, lots of political patronage.
The "National Climate Commission" would institutionalize special interests that favor taxes to combat climate change.
Underpins 80 federal regulations purportedly worth one trillion dollars
Fatally flawed metric or the most important number that you've never heard of?
If we accept the models, entirely eliminating all U.S. carbon emissions would have less than a negligible impact on temperatures by the end of the century.
Carbon tax and dividend plan would eliminate all EPA carbon regulations, all clean energy subsidies, and all energy efficiency standards.
Leading environmentalist groups hated its revenue neutrality
For some progressives it is more important to redistribute tax money than to save the climate.
Would it be worth doing in the absence of a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade market?
Libertarian Party candidate clarifies positions at New Hampshire rally.
Is a carbon tax a 'very libertarian proposal' for handling man-made global warming?
Headline: Exxon's CEO says fossil fuels are raising temperatures and sea levels: Why won't the Wall Street Journal?
Trolling for votes by pandering to environmental fundamentalists
According to Nobel economics laureate Joseph Stiglitz
Calculating cost of regulations in terms of carbon taxes
Putting economies on an energy diet is not the way to fight climate change.
Wrecking both health care and energy as a presidential legacy
Probably not likely to get anywhere though
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks