Clarence Thomas Sets a New SCOTUS Record
Plus: A "supremely cringe" viral tweet about the Supreme Court
Plus: A "supremely cringe" viral tweet about the Supreme Court
A recent YouGov poll shows the Court is likely less unpopular than before. The tariff ruling may have given it a boost. The poll has several other notable findings, as well.
Democratic state lawmakers want to give tax carveouts to certain restaurants. The real problem is New Jersey's tax code itself.
Trump's use of Section 122 ignored the plain language of the law and invoked a broad executive power where Congress clearly provided a narrow one.
The 2-1 decision concludes Trump's massive new tariffs are illegal because there is no "balance of payments deficit" of the kind needed to authorize them.
A trade deal that can be terminated by one person at any time and for any reason isn't really a trade deal at all.
However, the tariffs did shift supply chains away from China and towards other countries with low-cost manufacturing, like Vietnam, Malaysia, and India.
Conservative legal commentator Gregg Nunziata outlines reasons why conservatives should reject broad views of executive power.
The burden of Trump's illegal tariffs was spread across the American economy. The refunds likely won't cover all those costs.
When it costs more to build a house, it also costs more to rebuild one.
Before joining the Trump administration last year, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer lobbied for tariffs that limited fertilizer imports and drove up prices for American farmers.
I will be giving multiple talks in these two countries in late April and May.
Republicans and Democrats preach about food affordability. Yet their policies continue to make it worse.
America gets 90 percent of its fresh tomatoes from Mexico, and those imports were tariff-free until last year.
The plan is not completely terrible. But many importers may still have difficulty getting the refund money owed to them.
New study finds that tariffs were responsible for the "entirety of the excess inflation in the core goods category."
The outcome is unclear. But the judges seemed skeptical of the Trump Administration's claims that Section 122 grants them sweeping tariff powers.
The Court of International Trade is weighing the legality of the import taxes that the president wants to impose under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Any time government has greater control over commerce, there is an increased incentive to buy off officials or lobby for special treatment.
I submitted the brief on behalf of the Cato Institute and myself.
Plus: pro-tech media sells to big tech, Trump's new tariffs, jobs numbers, and more...
The reversal wasn't because the economics changed. It is because their biggest shareholders turned toward industrial policy.
Consider it a boozy, tariff-themed version of "I, Pencil."
Plus: back to the moon, one year since "Liberation Day," birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court, Jonathan lives, and more...
More than 89,000 manufacturing workers lost their jobs in the past year as tariffs caused input prices to rise and squeezed blue-collar industries.
The Trump administration keeps trying to find legal loopholes, but the will of the people is the final judge of any major policy.
There was little rhyme or reason to the president's "emergency" tariffs, which fluctuated wildly depending on his mood.
I was interviewed by Seattle University Law School of Law Dean Tony Varona and Prof. Andrew Siegeil.
Rep. Jimmy Panetta says Democrats have "learned the hard way" that handing over so much tariff authority to the executive branch is a bad idea.
The president is good at backing out of a losing bet—but this time, it's out of his hands.
The president and his new DHS secretary are enraged by jurists and legislators who refuse to toe the party line.
The president says federal courts should not make decisions based on partisan considerations unless it benefits him.
Plus: AI and entitlements, a new Turing prize winner, eight donuts a day, the first trailer for Dune 3, and more...
That’s roughly 12 whole days of government spending.
Plus: Brian Doherty, RIP.
By the administration's logic, Iowa is hurting Arizona by producing so much corn. This is a very silly way to think about economic policy.
The president’s invocation of Section 122 conflates a trade deficit with a balance-of-payments deficit.
LJC is the group with which I worked on the IEEPA tariff case decided by the Supreme Court.
The lawsuit, filed by attorneys general and governors from 24 states, claims that Trump is once again trying "to usurp the taxing power that the Constitution vests in Congress."
The massive new tariffs are illegal, just like the IEEPA tariffs previously invalidated by the Supreme Court.
Even if the refunds are made, business owners say they won't cover all the additional costs created by Trump's chaotic trade policies.
Plus: Congress shrugs, a cat cafe unionizes, and Liz Wolfe checks in, and more...
Importantly, the Court ordered payment of refunds even to those businesses who have not filed a lawsuit to claim them.
The president's wildly inaccurate ideological labels are no more meaningful than his other ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with him.
The Trump administration is trying to avoid paying refunds after illegally collecting $175 billion from its emergency tariff scheme.
I was one of the participants, along with Zach Shemtob (SCOTUSblog) and Julie SIlverbrook (NCC).
Gregg Nunziata interviewed me.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.