Meaningful Pentagon Cuts Will Require Rethinking What 'Defense' Means
If Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is serious about reducing military spending, he will need to embrace a narrower understanding of national security.
If Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is serious about reducing military spending, he will need to embrace a narrower understanding of national security.
It tries to offset as much as $4.8 trillion—mostly for tax cut extensions—with only $1.5 trillion in supposed spending reductions.
Elon Musk, the president's cost-cutting czar, has a habit of overpromising and underdelivering.
Even if the Department of Government Efficiency eliminates all improper payments and fraud, we'll still be facing a debt explosion—which requires structural reform.
The DOGE director wildly exaggerates what can be accomplished by tackling "waste, fraud, and abuse" in government spending without new legislation.
The pretend department’s downgraded mission reflects the gap between Trump’s promise of "smaller government" and the reality of what can be achieved without new legislation.
Republicans are betting trillions on the hope that the economy will grow fast enough to cover their deficit spree.
"Personnel is policy" has shaped past administrations. Kevin Hassett, who has been tapped to lead the National Economic Council, will have a hand in tax reform, debt reduction, and more.
Eliminating the deficit requires cutting the biggest spending—defense, Medicare, Social Security. So far, Trump says he won't touch those.
Almost exactly one year after Congress swore off self-inflicted fiscal crises, we're back to the same tired theatrics.
But at least he restored respect for a tariff-loving predecessor by renaming a mountain.
Not doing so could be harmful for just about everyone.
DOGE won't necessarily have to kill any of Republicans’ sacred cows—but they will have to be put on a diet.
The Treasury Secretary’s debt decisions during the pandemic locked in low rates—but only for two years. Now, taxpayers are paying the price.
With inflation risks persisting and entitlement spending surging, the situation cannot be ignored. But we never should have gotten to this point to begin with.
Plus: Taking gerontocracy to new heights, a real life Arc Reactor, Happy Festivus, and more...
Plus: House Speaker Elon Musk, the value of the debt ceiling, and D.C.'s shut down specials.
This week's House Budget Committee hearing showed bipartisan agreement about the seriousness of America's fiscal problems.
Everyone loves lower taxes, but cutting them without reducing spending is bad news for the national debt.
There's a good reason Biden eventually stopped saying Bidenomics. Americans didn't like the results of his economic policies.
If confirmed, Chris Wright and Gov. Doug Burgum will have the opportunity to prioritize innovation and deregulation to the benefit of taxpayers and the environment.
It would take nearly $8 trillion in budget cuts merely to stabilize the national debt so it does not grow faster than the economy.
Even before the pandemic spending increase, the budget deficit was approaching $1 trillion. The GOP has the chance to embrace fiscal sanity this time if they can find the political will.
Narrowly understood, the president-elect's familiar-sounding plan to tackle "massive waste and fraud" may not give us "smaller government" in any meaningful sense.
The president-elect’s record and campaign positions belie Elon Musk’s talk of spending cuts.
The two-time Libertarian Party presidential nominee shares his thoughts on Chase Oliver and the election.
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
The former president's increasingly lopsided economic policy proposals have the feel of throwing spaghetti at the wall.
When they entered the White House, the budget deficit was a pandemic-influenced $2.3 trillion, and it was set to fall to $905 billion by 2024. It's now twice what it was supposed to be.
According to recent data, people work less—and actually end up deeper in debt.
Spending increased by 10 percent last year, while tax revenue increased by 11 percent. Interest payments on the debt shot up by 34 percent.
If the former president wins the 2024 race, the circumstances he would inherit are far more challenging, and several of his policy ideas are destructive.
Reason's Nick Gillespie asked former President Donald Trump about how he plans to bring down the national debt.
Two former Republican staffers, David Stockman and Stephen Moore, debate the state of the party.
Both party leaders are selling the idea of a sovereign wealth fund, but it’s more political fantasy than fiscal fix.
Economist Bob Murphy explains the technical details of government debt and why Modern Monetary Theory is so dangerously wrong.
Lawmakers must be willing to reform so-called "mandatory spending," Pence's nonprofit argues in a new document.
The campaign promise from Donald Trump sounds nice, but it would be disastrous when considering the program is already racing toward insolvency.
Facing an economic downturn in the 1990s, Japan racked up debt. America should not repeat that mistake.
Should we blame Biden and the politicians applauding him for their unwillingness to address our looming fiscal disaster?
It's good to hear a candidate actually talk about our spending problem. But his campaign promises would exacerbate it.
The candidate supports gun rights, wants to privatize government programs, and would radically reduce the number of federal employees.
We asked delegates at the Republican National Convention whether a second Trump term would address America's debt problem.
There seems to be general bipartisan agreement on keeping a majority of the cuts, which are set to expire. They can be financed by cleaning out the tax code of unfair breaks.
Both parties—and the voters—are to blame for the national debt fiasco.
Opening night of the Republican National Convention programmed a central issue with a Trumpian twist: "Make America Wealthy Again."
Both parties—and the voters—are to blame for the national debt fiasco.
Although former President Donald Trump's deregulatory agenda would make some positive changes, it's simply not enough.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10