Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
Homeless sweeps, flirty fun, and a DeLorean dustup.
Homeless sweeps, flirty fun, and a DeLorean dustup.
Where one public official act is traded for another public official act, there has not been any illegal conduct.
Banzai! Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? In this case, yes.
"It's all over Facebook."
I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.
as a condition of having his criminal contempt sentence suspended. OK, says a North Carolina Court of Appeals opinion, though one judge dissents.
"Postpositive," not posterior.
The Court will likely dismiss the case as moot. But how? Through a quick, unsigned DIG? Or through a signed, divided opinion in June?
Episode 290 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
(The quote is from October Man, a splendid fantasy novella by Ben Aaronovitch, but it seemed so appropriate here.)
A pizza shop vandal, FOIA/RICO/1A, and the Case of the Polite Bank Robber.
In theory, at least, the House could continue to investigate possible impeachment proceedings indefinitely, even after an acquittal
This isn't a Thanksgiving post, but about those other conflicts-of-interest the President seems to have.
An interesting federal government argument, in a case pending in D.C. (U.S. v. Calloway).
The remedies casebook with a systematic presentation of equity
Is Justice Gorsuch going to vote with Justice Kagan?
Walter Nixon v. U.S. left open whether this question, which is not "weird," was justiciable
The DACA cases squarely present the question of whether Congress delegated the authority to resolve such a major question about immigration policy
An interesting New York constitutional interpretation case, involving a state constitutional right to collective bargaining.
In the short-term, lawyers on the bar line should receive numbered, reserved tickets. In the long-term, the Court should create a lottery for the bar line.
Professors Amy Wax and Eric Rasmusen were both prohibited from teaching required classes
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks