"The public—including other litigants—and other judges who may come into contact with [Richard] Liebowitz, a frequent litigant in this District, have an interest in the Court's determination of the veracity of these representations."
Once can be an honest mistake; now it looks intentional
No, the order does not "interpret Judaism as a nationality"
And this isn't "hijacking" in some virtual sense. (Computer crime—you're doing it wrong.)
While political attention is focused on impeachment, the Senate continues to confirm judicial nominees
An extraordinary letter from Amnesty Canada suggests that public universities shouldn't allow pro-Israel events to proceed
The House included "abuse of power" and "obstruction of congress," but excluded articles on the Emoluments Clauses, "bribery," and "obstruction of Justice"
The Notorious RBG is a notoriously quick opinion writer, but not this year.
I couldn't disagree more with my friend Josh Blackman. Here's why.
Probably not, because according to Senate rules, proceedings will likely begin at 1:00 p.m.
Everything is rehearsed, including how "how to swiftly dispatch with parliamentary disruptions from Republicans"
Loving v. Virginia did not "strike down" Virginia's ban on interracial marriage
Homeless sweeps, flirty fun, and a DeLorean dustup.
Where one public official act is traded for another public official act, there has not been any illegal conduct.
Banzai! Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? In this case, yes.
"It's all over Facebook."
I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.
as a condition of having his criminal contempt sentence suspended. OK, says a North Carolina Court of Appeals opinion, though one judge dissents.
"Postpositive," not posterior.
The Court will likely dismiss the case as moot. But how? Through a quick, unsigned DIG? Or through a signed, divided opinion in June?
Episode 290 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
(The quote is from October Man, a splendid fantasy novella by Ben Aaronovitch, but it seemed so appropriate here.)
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks