"Every lawyer has a professional duty to undertake affirmative steps to remedy de facto and de jure discrimination, eliminate bias, and promote equality, diversity and inclusion in the legal profession"
Less dependence on bail and stronger requirements for evidence sharing will help defendants fight charges.
Hate crime enhancements meet three-strikes laws, and the consequences are terrible.
Stranger abductions are actually extremely rare.
Tessa Majors may have been on way to buy illegal pot when she was stabbed to death. But if that's true, it's an argument against prohibition, not for it.
Be good, boys and girls, or we'll sue you, too.
"The public—including other litigants—and other judges who may come into contact with [Richard] Liebowitz, a frequent litigant in this District, have an interest in the Court's determination of the veracity of these representations."
Once can be an honest mistake; now it looks intentional
No, the order does not "interpret Judaism as a nationality"
And this isn't "hijacking" in some virtual sense. (Computer crime—you're doing it wrong.)
While political attention is focused on impeachment, the Senate continues to confirm judicial nominees
An extraordinary letter from Amnesty Canada suggests that public universities shouldn't allow pro-Israel events to proceed
The House included "abuse of power" and "obstruction of congress," but excluded articles on the Emoluments Clauses, "bribery," and "obstruction of Justice"
The Notorious RBG is a notoriously quick opinion writer, but not this year.
I couldn't disagree more with my friend Josh Blackman. Here's why.
Probably not, because according to Senate rules, proceedings will likely begin at 1:00 p.m.
Everything is rehearsed, including how "how to swiftly dispatch with parliamentary disruptions from Republicans"
Loving v. Virginia did not "strike down" Virginia's ban on interracial marriage
Homeless sweeps, flirty fun, and a DeLorean dustup.
Where one public official act is traded for another public official act, there has not been any illegal conduct.
Banzai! Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? In this case, yes.
"It's all over Facebook."
I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.
as a condition of having his criminal contempt sentence suspended. OK, says a North Carolina Court of Appeals opinion, though one judge dissents.
"Postpositive," not posterior.
The Court will likely dismiss the case as moot. But how? Through a quick, unsigned DIG? Or through a signed, divided opinion in June?
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
