Is the Supreme Court About to Take Its First Big CFAA Case?
Probably. And they certainly should.
Probably. And they certainly should.
See below for posts about other parts of this interesting and important opinion.
"It is remarkable how many ATTORNEYS appear inappropriately on camera."
Recent controversies over election rules and the coronavirus threat have bolstered advocates of decision-making by randomly selected groups of voters. But this approach still has serious flaws.
While calling the secret non-prosecution agreement of Epstein a "national disgrace," the Eleventh Circuit holds that the CVRA only extends victims' rights after an indictment. We will ask for rehearing en banc.
It puts privacy ideology above public health effectiveness
Chief Justice Rehnquist's prescient prediction in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985)
Episode 311 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
In the meantime, neighboring Netherlands, which a few weeks ago had a similar rate to Belgium's, now has half of Belgium's.
Even after the shutdown orders are lifted, businesses may fear liability if they reopen and someone supposedly gets sick as a result—when Congress concludes reopening is safe, should it block such liability?
My take on On Fire Christian Center, Inc v. Greg Fischer, et al.
"This duty doesn't evaporate in a crisis—in fact, a crisis may heighten the duty."
The store owner thought his employee acted in reasonable defense of property and self. The police disagreed.
What should a Court of Appeals do when the Supreme Court grants, or is about to grant, a case with related issues?
You'd think that would have been clear by now to prosecutors and judges.
It will be 8 pm Pacific, 9 pm Mountain, 10 pm Central, 11 pm Eastern, on Tuesday, March 31, for about an hour.
Very high in Italy and Spain, followed by France, Switzerland, Belgium, and the Netherlands, followed by Denmark, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, the U.S., and Germany.
This is an advisory list, but I expect will have some influence on some local governments.
I'm toying with doing that with a couple of colleagues -- any suggestions on how to make it work?
So opines the Texas AG, interpreting Texas state statutes (and not needing to consider the Second Amendment).
A cold prison, a suspicious suicide, and federal advisory committees.
"I know professors at the University of Pennsylvania. Professors at the University of Pennsylvania are friends of mine. Senator, you're no University of Pennsylvania Professor."
"At the same time these Defendants" "entirely closed off any and all means for law-abiding private citizens to obtain firearms in New Jersey," "the State has permitted the retailers of many other products—including alcohol, marijuana, and office supplies—to continue distributing goods to the public."
How much risk of loss of life people are willing to accept likely depends on how one asks the question
(All numbers are plus or minus about 15%.)
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10