Supreme Court Upholds Broad Reading of Clean Water Act
Environmental groups were worried the Court would curtail CWA jurisdiction in Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. It didn't.
Environmental groups were worried the Court would curtail CWA jurisdiction in Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. It didn't.
Miami’s police chief orders officers to reduce ticketing and public interactions. Mayhem doesn’t ensue.
How often does the SG dismiss an indictment while a cert petition is pending, without a confession of error? And is there a connection to the Obamacare case?
Thanks for Marcia Coyle for tracking down the Solicitor General's confession of error, which was not publicly available
My law school is. Anyone else?
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court weighs in.
On due process and citizenship litigation
Gems from Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian
Ramos was not nearly as fractured as Apodaca, but the Court is still splintered on the value of precedent
All three of today's Supreme Court decisions featured unusual alignments among the justices.
Hair microscopy, an economist breaks bad, and the non-prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.
"but then you probably are making a judgment call that you need to let a judge make"—reasoning from a New Mexico trial court judge, recently reversed by an appellate court.
Trump is a master of instantly changing the narrative so we forget about yesterday.
Congratulations to the top 8 teams
No President has ever adjourned Congress before. Yet at least.
The Supreme Court should permanently exempt cert-stage briefs from the Byzantine printing and paper requirements of Rule 33.1
Probably. And they certainly should.
See below for posts about other parts of this interesting and important opinion.
"It is remarkable how many ATTORNEYS appear inappropriately on camera."
Recent controversies over election rules and the coronavirus threat have bolstered advocates of decision-making by randomly selected groups of voters. But this approach still has serious flaws.
While calling the secret non-prosecution agreement of Epstein a "national disgrace," the Eleventh Circuit holds that the CVRA only extends victims' rights after an indictment. We will ask for rehearing en banc.
It puts privacy ideology above public health effectiveness
Chief Justice Rehnquist's prescient prediction in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985)
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10