Lock Them Up?
Will the Biden administration prosecute lawyers in the Trump Administration?
Fisher II had a four-member majority. And at least one court read June Medical as overruling WWH in part.
26 U.S.C. 7508A gives the Secretary the authority to "specify a period of up to 1 year that may be disregarded in determining, under the internal revenue laws, in respect of any tax liability of such taxpayer" whether the "Payment of any income, estate, gift, employment, or excise tax or any installment thereof or of any other liability to the United States in respect thereof" was "performed within the time prescribed therefor . . . of such disaster or action."
42 U.S.C. 5174(e)(2): "The President, in consultation with the Governor of a State, may provide financial assistance" to "an individual or household in the State who is adversely affected by a major disaster" to address "other necessary expenses or serious needs resulting from the major disaster."
Defer payroll taxes till December 31, 2020, and forgive them if Trump wins re-election.
States can choose to obtain additional funding for providing unemployment benefits.
The Trump Administration tries to employ the Regents strategy before the election.
(1) Student loan payment relief, (2) assistance to renters and homeowners, (3) deferring payroll tax obligations, (4) assistance for COVID-19.
"the activities that will be engaged in during a wedding will be much the same as those engaged in while dining at a restaurant, including having groups of individuals of no more than ten in number at tables seated for dining."
This is the Georgana Sziszak case I blogged about yesterday.
Judge Martin and Chief Judge Pryor vigorously disagree over how to characterize a bathroom case from Florida.
The Cato Institute's amicus brief in California v. Texas proposed a very similar idea.
Justice Wiemer said he did not need to recuse, or disclose the fact that his daughter was scheduled to take the bar exam.
What about students who do not wish to share their image?
The fatal encounter demonstrates why police reformers want more departments to train officers in de-escalation.
Court panel rules judge didn't properly evaluate juror bias against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
A "Minneapolis effect" from lack of policing is a possible explanation for the startling 37% increase in murders in major cities in recent weeks.
The FDA and the NIH each require as a condition of funding that scientists break down their data by a totally unscientific "race" classifications.
However necessary a federal presence may be in some places, DHS should leave the CBP at home.
The Chief Justice's votes against injunctive relief for churches, voters, and those on death row are of a piece.
Law schools can help their students present better interviews over videoconferences.
Could the House or Senate require Federal Judges To testify why they declined to recuse in a case?
The Alaska Supreme Court, applying the RFRA-like state constitutional regime, concludes that removing the daughter as guardian is necessary to serve a compelling government interest.
Justice Kavanaugh's dissent cogently explains why the Chief Justice erred in South Bay. The Chief Justice has no response.
This statute would obviate the statutory analysis in Trump v. Hawaii.
A transatlantic pie fight, a pecunious divorce, and a putrid pool of purple ink.
Justice Gorsuch needs to account for both text and precedent when interpreting old statutes.
The reporter made a good-faith mistake based on an incomplete PACER download. Judge Callahan should apologize.
But the real story are DHS' s painful lies to SDNY
Nationwide, 80% of first-time test takers pass the bar exam, and 90% will pass within two years. But 10% of takers will not have passed after two years, and some will never pass.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks