New York Is Having a Violent Summer, But It's Not Because of Bail Reform
The NYPD is still blaming jail releases, but the data simply doesn’t back that claim up.
The NYPD is still blaming jail releases, but the data simply doesn’t back that claim up.
It officially adopted the political theory of the United States: securing the individual rights of We the People
Equality, inalienable rights, and consent of the governed can be opposed only by reactionaries
Seven Justices agree to to allow "Online" bar exam in October. Two Justices would "adopt a diploma privilege in lieu of the bar examination."
Excessive radon, Armageddon, and a hopeless romantic.
The Court quietly ruled on Abortion, Free Exercise, the Mueller Report, Voting Rights, and the Suspension Clause.
What happens when a decades-long mystery gets solved while you’re explaining it?
Partners (who needn't be romantically involved with each other) can benefit from each other's health insurance—but siblings living together can't.
Phase 1 began with South Bay v. Newsom on May 29. Now, we go into Phase 10: Overtime.
Halfway Stare Decisis, like Halfway Textualism, Allows the Court to be Ruled by the Dead Hand of William Brennan.
Roberts's fidelity to stare decisis does not include following precedents as written. And we all know it.
Hamilton said that Senate must consent when a new President "displaces," that is substitutes an old officer with a new officer.
Blue June buries Boumediene, Whole Woman's Health, and Trinity Lutheran Footnote 3.
Is Espinoza enough to make conservatives look past the Chief's never-ending chess match?
A new three-strikes sentencing opinion from a California court.
Roberts and Kagan present two very different conceptions of the separation of powers.
The Chief feints left on abortion, tiptoes to the right on the CFPB, and Thomas is still waiting for Godot
The opposition to mask-mandates harkens back to the Obamacare challenge.
This landmark Title VII case relied on the "familiar rule" from Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States.
The steel mill owners had a concrete, property interest that was impaired by the government's actions. The plaintiffs did not rely on a generalized allegation of ultra vires action by the Secretary of Commerce.
The Washington Post's Radley Balko vs. the Manhattan Institute's Rafael Mangual on whether "there is overwhelming evidence that the criminal justice system is racist."
The Washington Post's Radley Balko vs. The Manhattan Institute's Rafael Mangual on whether or not "there is overwhelming evidence that the criminal justice system is racist."
Randy Barnett and I explain where Justice Gorsuch went wrong in Bostock
Fifth and final post in a series based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
"One of the most frequently sanctioned lawyers, if not the most frequently sanctioned lawyer," in the Southern District of New York.
Rhetorical power isn't about one thing; it's always about two.
Many high schools and middle schools are assigning this 'antiracism' book associated with Critical Race Theory; besides being ideologically pernicious, it's bad history
The majority and dissent vigorously disagree about the role history should play in this Suspension Clause case
The Court's first major Suspension Clause case since Boumediene.
The AALS "Meat Market" will have to find another home; or go fully virtual!