U.K. Government Insists Guardian's NSA Data Posed "Threat to National Security"
Even though destroying hard drives didn't destroy the widely disseminated data
Even though destroying hard drives didn't destroy the widely disseminated data
Heavily redacted, but still somewhat readable
More than has been publicly acknowledged
Or rather, it finds it "difficult to imagine a scenario" in which they would.
20 al Qaeda leaders allegedly participated
Since they wanted information about inconvenient journalism
Even after they were told the data was backed up around the world
They already said there are no privacy concerns
How about some on theirs, too?
Why are they defending an agency that may even be concealing information from them?
Applying a little pressure over spying revelations?
To refuse to serve the state is the highest crime
The president and congressional leaders are proven liars
For lying to Congress about spying
Can't have oversight when overseers aren't given information
Provide generic info when asking for permission to surveil from FISA court
And yes, they've accessed content
The snoops aren't going to like this
Why is Bloomberg afraid to equip New York City police with body cameras?
Congress not provided with important information prior to Patriot Act renewal
Look elsewhere for privacy
It would be a bit of a conflict of interest
A review of the NSA's surveillance managed by the executive branch can't really be called "independent"
Heading off the surveillance state
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10