Federal Court Blocks Arkansas Law That Limits "Harmful to Minors" Books in Libraries and Bookstores, and Also
limits "inappropriate" books in libraries.
limits "inappropriate" books in libraries.
A boomer, a Gen Xer, and a Millennial discuss the causes and conflicts of today's generational gaps.
In this case, an LA SWAT team destroyed an innocent store owner's shop in the process of trying to catch a suspect.
Wright claims he's Satoshi Nakamoto, who's credited with inventing Bitcoin; defendant claimed otherwise.
Americans will need a visa to visit Europe in 2024. Meanwhile, Europeans who have been to Cuba are discovering they can't come to the U.S., because terrorism.
"Can someone quickly remind me why we were removing—rather than demoting/labeling—claims that Covid is man made," asked Meta's president for global affairs.
The E.U.’s Digital Services Act will encourage censorship around the world and even in the U.S.
Carlos Pena's livelihood has been crippled. It remains to be seen if he'll have any right to compensation.
Texas A&M placed a professor on paid leave for criticizing Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick in a lecture on the opioid crisis.
A federal judge objected to two aspects of the agreement that seemed designed to shield Biden from the possibility that his father will lose reelection next year.
Maurice Jimmerson finally got a trial after a decade of pretrial detention. It ended in a hung jury.
After its spectacular screw-ups on COVID-19 "misinformation," the government shouldn't be so quick to squelch dissenting voices.
So says a federal judge in California, applying statutes that protect private employees from firing based on their "political activities."
A judge's questions about his plea deal should not obscure the point that the law he broke is unjust and arguably unconstitutional.
The maverick journalist talks Twitter Files, the end of the anti-government left, Donald Trump, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Two Central District of California case reach different results.
The furious response to a seemingly modest reform reflects a broader dispute about the role of courts in a democracy.
"The professor, an expert on the opioids crisis, was placed on paid administrative leave and investigated, raising questions about the extent of political interference in higher education, particularly in health-related matters."
As states continue to implement digital ID systems, it is essential that they build tools in ways that inherently protect civil liberties rather than asking citizens to just trust government officials.
Plus: Should libertarians consider employing noble lies when pitching themselves to new potential voters?
Both the state attorney general and the state legislature declined to defend the law in court after the ACLU of Arizona and news media organizations sued to overturn it.
Police claimed Mack Nelson fell while resisting an officer. A video proved them wrong.
SeanPaul Reyes has been arrested and threatened by NYPD for filming in public places, including inside police precincts. He says that's a violation of his First Amendment rights.
The ruling draws back the veil on routine police practices that victimize innocent drivers.
Horrible things are happening to vulnerable people, but we cannot help them by sending groups of vigilantes or law enforcement officers to hunt them.
A recent House committee investigation exposed political interference when it came to figuring out the origins of COVID. But why?
DeSantis talks a lot about freedom but increasingly only applies it to those who agree with him.
Appeals in the January 6 cases raise serious questions about how broadly the statute should be applied.
Blame university administrators.
"There is an inherent inequality in allowing an accuser to proceed pseudonymously while the defendant is forced to defend himself publicly."
Plus: Twitter subpoenas Elizabeth Warren's communications with the SEC, mortgage rates are starting to fall, and more...
Damien Smith claims in a new lawsuit that police racially profiled him and violated his First, Fourth, and 14th Amendment rights.
The Third Circuit holds that, once the government released the documents, it couldn't then forbid the grandmother (or others) from publishing them.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10