Trump's Legal Complaints Against 2 News Outlets Reflect His Disregard for Freedom of the Press
The Republican presidential candidate argues that CBS and The Washington Post broke the law by covering the election in ways he did not like.
The Republican presidential candidate argues that CBS and The Washington Post broke the law by covering the election in ways he did not like.
After being arrested for doing journalism, Priscilla Villarreal has taken her fight to the courts.
The latest podcast episode from Prof. Jane Bambauer (Florida) and me.
Inhumane labor practices, worker deaths, and the forced eviction and repression of local residents have characterized the kingdom's efforts to build a miles-long linear skyscraper in the desert.
Fort the answer—or rather, answers—a court has to resolve a choice of law question.
The judges divide over whether a challenge to a law limiting the number of bullets in a magazine is likely to succeed. Is next stop the Supreme Court?
Washington's Covenant Homeownership Program excludes certain applicants on the basis of race.
Campaign finance records reveal what the community at the heart of U.S. national security policy thinks about outside politics.
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium.
Plus: Andrew Cuomo's potential prosecution, Texas death blamed on abortion ban, and more...
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium.
Federal agents are allowed to search private property without a warrant under this Prohibition-era Supreme Court precedent.
A university president provides a helpful explanation of the difference.
The Stony Brook sociologist discusses how progressives are having a hard time processing why more and more black and Latino voters are supporting Donald Trump.
The groups are challenging a Florida law that bans some teens from social media.
By prosecuting the website's founders, the government chilled free speech online and ruined lives.
A review of Prof. Mary Anne Franks' new book, Fearless Speech: Breaking Free from the First Amendment (plus a response by Prof. Franks to Prof. Mchangama's Tweeted criticisms, and a reply by Prof. Mchangama).
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium.
So holds a federal court (correctly, I think), considering restrictions that were prompted by Texas Governor Abbott's General Order GA-44.
Regulating AI could threaten free speech, just as earlier proposed regulations of other media once did.
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium.
Despite his cluelessness, the former president's inclination to punish constitutionally protected speech reflects his authoritarian disregard for civil liberties.
Sending user manuals, algorithms, and lines of code can be legally equivalent to exporting bombs.
The allegedly libelous claims about the candidate were made three months after he lost the election; a Magistrate Judge had held the candidate was no longer a public figure, but the District Court disagreed.
Rebekah Massie's removal and arrest from a city council meeting was "objectively outrageous," the judge ruled.
The court also concluded defendant had libeled plaintiff, but the court held that even the nonlibelous expressions of opinion could lead to emotional distress liability. The total verdict of $6.8M.
The police targeted “sovereign citizens” for surveillance and disarmament.
Former cop Julian Alcala allegedly stole a woman's nude pictures after he took her phone during a traffic stop.
may be constitutionally unprotected threat.
"Invoking the innocence of children is not...a magic incantation sufficient for legislatures to run roughshod over the First Amendment rights of adults."
The co-founder of Ideas Beyond Borders argues that there is "no better independence than economic independence."
Decades of border surveillance programs have spent billions of dollars but achieved little.
"Plaintiff's allegations are emotionally and politically charged, and ... Plaintiff is a member of certain groups subject to discrimination. That, however, is true of a plethora of cases in the federal courts and has generally not been understood to authorize anonymous pleading."
As millions of Christians plan to sit out the election, church leaders face tough choices about how to inspire their congregations without violating the law.
The court concludes that X's requested discovery is broader than necessary, though it leaves open the door to some considerably narrower discovery.
While I am eager for the Court to take another public use case, I am actually happy the justices chose to reject this one. Its unusual facts made it a poor vehicle for revisiting Kelo v. City of New London.