Netflix Staff Apparently Unaware That Dave Chappelle's Comedy Special Would Include Jokes
No one is safe from Chappelle's jokes—but also, everyone is safe from Chappelle's jokes.
No one is safe from Chappelle's jokes—but also, everyone is safe from Chappelle's jokes.
Former Judge Luttig's arguments are off base.
Court finds that a Canton, Michigan ordinance requiring mitigation for tree removal constitutes an uncompensated taking.
Administrators attempted to force an apology out of a second-year law student whose Federalist Society affiliations and use of the term "trap house" were "triggering" to his peers.
No accountability for government corruption.
Such libel cases aren't easy to win, but sometimes they can indeed be won.
denial of access to government property, even in a "nonpublic forum" or "limited public forum"
The Massachusetts Model was not a carry ban and required aggressive behavior before it applied.
The experience with the Texas Heartbeat Act offers a preview of what that means.
Governments should not design laws and regulations to frustrate judicial review.
With “keyword warrants,” anyone who queries certain terms on search engines will get caught in the surveillance dragnet.
New York takes a long shot at saving its firearm carry ban.
The federal government and police are finding new ways to use drones to invade privacy.
Too often, the government punishes citizens who reveal the state's true behavior to their fellow Americans.
A new short article of mine, calved off my duty-to-take-down-libels article; I'd love to hear feedback, especially suggestions for a clearer title.
The unusually named case is Doe v. Anonymous #1, now pending in Brooklyn state trial court.
New York’s Supreme Court brief on the Second Amendment is flawed.
"When my daughter was 12 she'd walk down the streets of Shanghai to get donuts," says the mom, Megan McMurry.
"after daring to express unrelated views that, although controversial, happen to be held by a majority of the American public."
Kylee McLaughlin is claiming coaches engaged in "pressure and retaliation ... due to her political beliefs and her reactions to claims of racism," because of the coaches' "political or social justice beliefs, including support for critical race theory, opposition to President Trump, and a belief that white persons like plaintiff are privileged and racist."
S.B. 8 allows lawsuits against people who perform prohibited abortions even if they relied on a court's determination that the law is unconstitutional.
Police are supposed to be part of a community, not an occupying military force armed to the teeth.
"It gives cities a protection that ordinary citizens never have."
In a prior case challenging the law, the 5th Circuit said state judges were not appropriate defendants.
Plus: Twitter's new trigger warnings, good news for food freedom, and more...
Miller had asked the court to issue a temporary restraining order; no, said Judge Emily Hagan (Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas).
Criticism of a foreign country (or at least this foreign country) is now apparently forbidden by Emerson.
"Do you really want to live in a country where government bureaucrats, based on whim and personal preference, can censor whatever they don't like?"
Plus: California can't limit private prisons, Yellen dismisses bank privacy concerns, and more...
Supportive letters submitted by the defendant at sentencing can’t remain secret.
"regardless whether the motion [to seal] is opposed or unopposed."
Plus: Most Republicans oppose fetal heartbeat laws, FDA authorizes rapid at-home COVID-19 tests, and more...
Qualified immunity "does not protect an officer who inflicts deadly force on a person who is only a threat to himself."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks