Appalling that an American university, which had publicly committed itself to free expression, would thus censor criticism of a foreign government (whether China, Israel, or any other).
The court takes a narrow view of 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1), but rejects liability as a matter of state law: “public policy [with regard to how gun sales can be arranged] is more properly determined by the peoples’ elected representatives rather than by the courts.”
Sen. Amy Klobuchar wants to put HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the former California attorney general with a reputation for being a partisan hack, in charge of "health disinformation" online.
When should rap lyrics (or other works) be admissible as evidence on the theory that they reflect real events?
Despite a tragic on-set death, there is no need to involve police officers in still more aspects of people's lives.
Plus: Consumer prices surge, a Virginia school district talks openly about burning books, and more...
Judge Bruce Schroeder rightly reprimanded Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger for what he called a "grave constitutional violation."
Misinformation and bad policy can only be defeated by robust, open debate in the public square.
The Supreme Court should reject a law that bars ordinary people from carrying guns for self-defense.
An online event hosted by the Harvard Federalist Society
Bau Tran might go to jail for his conduct, but he will be insulated from having to face a jury in civil court.
Plus: Biden administration defends vaccine mandate, Bari Weiss announces the University of Austin, and more...
"Plaintiff is an adult who chose to enter the political arena and now to file this litigation, asserting claims against Defendant as a result of Defendant's alleged statements and activities concerning Plaintiff and Plaintiff's political campaign."
The slippery slope risks created by upholding SB 8 threaten a vital constitutional principle - one far more important than any considerations on the other side. That is sufficient reason to rule against Texas in this case.
The government had tried to shut down the 200-acre grounds for two months (including during a special session of the Legislature) for tree decoration.
The anti-Biden slogan is clearly protected by the First Amendment.
Keddins Etienne's experience shows that bullies who seize innocent people's property tend to back down when their victims put up a fight.
The investigation of Trump aide Carter Page has exposed major problems with federal secret surveillance warrants.
Universities should not compel professors to affirm their belief of contested values
for saying "LGBTQ+" "Pride" message is "against our biblical doctrine."
That can't be constitutional.
"Outside activities that may pose a conflict of interest to the executive branch of the State of Florida create a conflict for the University of Florida," said the university in a statement.
denial of access to government property, even in a "nonpublic forum" or "limited public forum"
The grandmaster and human rights activist talks about the lessons the world—especially American democratic socialists—must remember three decades after communism's collapse.
"This is not just an obvious constitutional infringement—it's hard to imagine a more textbook violation of the First Amendment."
A majority of the Court voiced skepticism about the state’s conceal-carry licensing scheme.
The Die Hard 2 Principle makes a special appearance.
The Pennsbury School Board is not only chilling speech, but also editing out community members’ critiques of the school board from YouTube videos of their meetings.
A requirement that professors serving as expert witnesses against the state do so pro bono is still unconstitutional
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks