California Lt. Gov. Takes Detour on Pot, Embraces More Gun Control
Triggers coming gun fight.
Triggers coming gun fight.
There's little chance of Australia's model coming to the states.
The major political parties both push policies that endanger our most basic liberties.
What should have been a peaceful encounter with an officer ended in man's death.
The Democratic presidential candidate thinks Australia's mass confiscation of firearms "is a good example."
Second Circuit finds "intermediate scrutiny" of laws impacting Second Amendment allows full ban of certain weapons to pass constitutional muster.
These anti-gun positions haven't traditionally done the Democratic Party much good.
A teenager used the gun to shoot two police officers.
About that National Journal gun chart…
Black Panthers, hunters, and "nuts with guns"
For the liberal, every societal problem has a state-issued remedy waiting to be administered.
Despite continuing declines in gun violence, Fred Hiatt says enough is enough.
An expanded requirement would be ineffective, unjust, and unenforceable.
Clinton wants to make gun manufacturers financially liable for misuse of their products and require background checks for all gun transfers.
Not what People wants them to think.
Would losing the 2nd Amendment be more 'devastating' than losing innocent lives?
Guns - and the Second Amendment - won't just disappear.
The New York Times, in a not-so-subtle slam against gun rights, says he did.
Like the president, the presumptive Democratic nominee assumes we can identify mass shooters before they strike.
What happened to gun control from 2000 to 2012? Funny you should ask...
Talking about mass shootings, the president cited data on suicides.
What The New Yorker gets wrong about guns and the Constitution.
Increasingly sophisticated homemade guns are so entrenched cops fear their use by organized crime, so now let's fret over desktop weapons of mass destruction.
More background checks, more assault weapon bans, more suits against gun makers and sellers, and expanding group of people to whom gun ownership bans apply.
School is supposed to teach kids to think critically. Instead, they encounter instead a system that is arbitrary, harsh, and ineffective at teaching.
How would the government enforce a limit on the number of firearms people may possess?
Their profile is shared by many people who never kill anyone.
The only defender guaranteed to be present at any attack against you is you.
Last week President Obama asked us to compare terrorism to gun violence. Maybe we should.
Obama's talk of common-sense gun safety laws don't seem to apply to this tragedy.
Wants less shouting, more good policy.
Any attempt to stop would-be murderers from buying guns is bound to be overinclusive, underinclusive, or both.
How can we know simple gun safety laws would help when we know nothing about circumstances of how the killer got the gun?
In Delaware County, Pennsylvania.
The answer, like the frequency of youth gun carrying, may vary from state to state.
The most popular gun-control proposals would have little effect, while the most effective measures would be immensely unpopular.
During the Miss America contest, the contestant said no to banning "military-style assault weapons."
Do less than 1 percent of crime victims defend themselves with firearms?
State AG just got the authority to investigate such shootings last month.
At stake: Possessing a firearm during a "crime of violence" adds five extra years to a felony sentence.
National Journal reads too much into a correlation.
A thriving and unbeatable black market makes weapons available no matter what officials intend.