Does Ban on Carrying Weapons "Inside Any Building in Which Judicial Proceedings Are in Progress" …
apply to a judge's home when the judge is participating in judicial proceedings remotely?
apply to a judge's home when the judge is participating in judicial proceedings remotely?
Plus: Ukraine war developments, Biden's new tax scheme, and more...
Plus: A Florida arms manufacturer is donating weapons to Ukraine's defense effort, China eases up on its "COVID Zero" policies, and Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson's confirmation hearings begin today...
Lawful gun owners should not be forced to jump through hoops just to exercise basic constitutional rights
The applicant had a 5-year-old drunk driving arrest (which led to a conviction on a reduced charge) and a 12-year-old conviction of drinking alcohol by a passenger.
Although a Texas Supreme Court ruling ended the main challenge to the law, other cases could ultimately block its enforcement.
Ukrainians have taken to the streets with arms to defend their country and their freedom.
They’re not the only ones who should be allowed to protect themselves.
Biden offered a mix of mostly pointless or arguably unconstitutional "solutions" to the misuse of guns by criminals.
Firearm seizures are ineffective, and gun possession arrests are frequently unjust.
The suit deserves to fail for much the same reasons as Trump-era attacks on immigration sanctuaries.
Plus: An antitrust lawsuit against Juul was dismissed, the EARN IT Act's sponsor has a new proposal, and more...
Larry Krasner also questions the effectiveness of "supply-side" measures aimed at reducing criminals' access to firearms.
Banning "no-knock" search warrants is not enough to prevent lethal confrontations between cops and people exercising the right to armed self-defense.
A settlement means no official legal precedent is set, but holding gun sellers responsible for crimes of gun users could harm Americans' ability to enjoy their Second Amendment rights.
Already abused for political purposes, the power of government shouldn’t be expanded based on lies.
The 22-year-old man was shot by a Minneapolis police officer during the execution of a no-knock warrant on which he was not named.
Despite a binary media narrative, the vast majority of the U.S. is in favor of quality, accountable policing.
Politicians deputize the private sector to restrict rights protected from the government.
If you want to own a machine gun, it's probably not going to happen anytime soon—even if you make a decent living and have never committed a crime.
After more than a decade of subversion, the Supreme Court has a chance to rectify this situation.
Judge Lawrence VanDyke included a satirical opinion that his colleagues can use when they decide otherwise.
After sweeping last November's elections, Virginia Republicans look to roll back Democratic gun laws.
The ATF is expected to adopt a new rule requiring that the metal parts hobbyists used to manufacture their DIY weapons be registered as legal firearms. So Cody Wilson made those parts unnecessary.
It's easy for many people to see the harm that guns are involved in every day in America, but much harder for them to see the harm that gun prohibition causes.
It's bad public policy to leap to the conclusion that we do.
That's the issue raised by a newly filed federal lawsuit.
Gavin Newsom is exploring legislation to authorize private civil actions against people who sell "assault weapons" or gun kits.
It's time to spread cheer. Reason is here to help.
There's no general federal right to them; they are often available when a law is enforced by government officials, but generally not as to laws in which private citizens sue (whether over abortion, speech, religious exercise, gun ownership or sales, or anything else).
The organization's embrace of a wide-ranging progressive agenda undermines its reason for existing.
The district court decision upholding the ATF's conclusion that bump stocks constitute unlawful "machine guns" is upheld by an equally divided court.
Despite such magazines being widely and lawfully used, and with the ban having been tossed out by other courts and court panels, the 9th Circuit thinks the ban does not violate the Second Amendment
Eric Adams thinks he can give the police more power to hunt for guns without making innocent minority men the inevitable target.
The jury rightly concluded that the prosecution failed to prove its case.
Some are using Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal to argue for harsher laws and punishments. Andrew Coffee IV's case is a study in why that's an awful idea.
Restrictions have little chance of moving beyond political theater, or of winning compliance if passed.
The trial became an upside-down microcosm for the polarized debates about the U.S. criminal justice system.
This stop was a Fourth Amendment violation, holds a federal court.
Plus: Yale University faces an interesting lawsuit, the ACLU takes a stance on student loan debt, and more...
Defendant had posted three photos to Instagram showing (1) a movie ticket, (2) ammunition, and (3) the inside of a theater, and also one to Snapchat showing (4) a handgun.