Larry Flynt Made the World Freer for Everybody by Pushing Boundaries
Abrasive, tasteless, and uncompromising, Flynt undoubtedly made the world safer for speech of all varieties.
Abrasive, tasteless, and uncompromising, Flynt undoubtedly made the world safer for speech of all varieties.
Plus: The aftermath of the New York Times' anti-Pornhub crusade, and more...
whenever the judge, prosecutor, or police officer demands that the relative's name be taken down.
One provision has been invalidated, but the general ban on boycotts of Israel by most state government contractors still stands.
Likely fair use, at least under the Second Circuit's precedents.
"It is simply not reasonable for a plaintiff to bring a case alleging that his constitutional rights were violated by state officials and not expect the facts on which those officials based their actions to be included in the public record of a case."
Tech companies should have the same freedom to choose their customers.
A person you know might be having an online conversation without a transcriptionist and a fact-checker right now, and we have to stop it.
"Unfit to Print: The Post publishes column The Times wouldn't"
My conversation with Prof. Eric Goldman (Santa Clara) via the UCLA Institute for Technology, Law, and Policy.
Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas has been appointed to hear the case.
No amount of parsing can obscure his responsibility for the deadly attack on the Capitol.
The First Amendment and statutory questions in the Douglass Mackey / Ricky Vaughn case.
He is on firmer ground in arguing that the Senate does not have the authority to try a former president, although that issue is highly contested.
Plus: Oklahoma cosmetologists fight insane licensing requirement, Australia doesn't understand how search engines work, and more...
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is suing on her behalf.
I've been seeing many such libel lawsuits recently, though only a few have gone so far as to yield a verdict for the libel plaintiff.
A forthcoming panel Thu., Feb. 11, 2 to 3 pm Pacific, organized by the UCLA Institute for Technology, Law, and Policy.
"The University’s responsibility to protect academic freedom and freedom of expression cannot be outsourced."
An interesting ruling involving the University of Minnesota, by Judge Patrick Schiltz (himself a former professor).
It’s a terrible idea that violates Section 230, but is it actually unconstitutional? Don’t be so sure.
They also argue that the Senate has no authority to try a former president.
The House brief does a solid job of laying out the case against Trump. The defense brief is far less impressive.
Plus: Oregon decriminalizes hard drugs, Kroger closes stores over hazard pay rule, and more...
Plus a special appearance by The Princess Bride and Weekend at Bernie's.
The State Bar of Georgia is demanding that the pro-Trump lawyer undergo a mental health evaluation.
The defendant swore a Verizon store employee "cupped her breast and touched her inner thigh," but surveillance video showed otherwise.
Consumers aren't confused about where plant milks come from. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Government will happily suppress misinformation in favor of misinformation of its own.
applied by a federal court in a case involving Juul Labs.
A decision in the case of Ethereum researcher Virgil Griffith, denying his motion to dismiss.
May public schools punish students for off-campus social media posts?
So the Eighth Circuit held yesterday, distinguishing the @RealDonaldTrump case on the grounds that the Trump account was used for much more official activity.
California statutes suggest the answer may be no, so long as the firing is based on the political activity, and not on criminal conduct.
Colleen Oefelein was fired by the Jennifer De Chiara Literary Agency, and the incident illustrates the vagueness of New York law on this point.
Plus: Senators call impeachment trial unconstitutional, Biden cancels private prison contracts, Apple sued over Telegram, and more...
Federal court holds that documents accompanying motions are presumptively accessible even if the case settles before the court decides the motion.
"The only people who broke the law here were the police officers and TBI agents who participated in this flagrantly unconstitutional arrest."
And can't "participate in any protests, rallies or demonstrations."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks