Journal of Free Speech Law: "Cancel Culture and the Constitution: Three Reasons Why We Should Embrace Free Speech," by Judge James Ho
Based on a Constitution Day Lecture delivered at Wofford College last September 11.
Based on a Constitution Day Lecture delivered at Wofford College last September 11.
A lawsuit argues that Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem coerced Apple and Meta to censor two popular ICE-monitoring tools, which violates Americans' right to freedom of expression.
A district court concluded plaintiff had adequately alleged (it's all just allegations at this point) that the article included false and defamatory statements, but hadn't adequately alleged the statements were knowingly or recklessly false, and hadn't adequately alleged damages.
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Rumeysa Ozturk is one of several international students targeted by the Trump administration's speech-based deportation policy.
Plus: An immigration court drops Rumeysa Ozturk's deportation case, Buddhist monks complete their "walk for peace," previously classified Nixon grand jury testimony is released, and more...
China's "national security law" was perfectly tailored to zero in on someone like Lai, who vigorously pushed for democracy, freedom of speech, and government reform in Hong Kong.
"Defendant Cline also showed former Defendant Joshua Woolsey [whose wife was then running for judge against plaintiff] an unredacted copy of the [sexual assault police report filed by the plaintiff] ... after Joshua Woolsey made a public records request for all records pertaining to Plaintiff."
The commission has targeted the news rating company with onerous record demands and a merger condition aimed at cutting off its revenue.
Plus: Jimmy Lai sentenced to 20 years in prison, endemic fraud in federal welfare, Ghislaine Maxwell won't talk to Congress, and more...
Readers, these are trained pro se litigants; do not try this at home (especially since other courts might disagree).
"But that does not mean that litigants have a right to hide them from the public once they are implicated in court proceedings."
"What plaintiffs are really asking us to do is read subtext into the Provision's text."
The federal case against the former CNN anchor hinges on conduct that can plausibly be viewed as part of a journalist's work, combined with the obvious partiality of that work.
The bill has a wide variety of groups worried that they could be targeted for criticism of large agribusinesses.
Yes, that includes drag queen story hour.
A federal indictment accuses him and another journalist of conspiring with protesters who disrupted a St. Paul church service.
But Council Member Peter Ortiz had gotten a temporary order that was in effect for nearly four months; the underlying disputed stemmed from a controversy related to a "Drag Queen story time."
in a lawsuit brought by the Babylon Bee.
A new bill in Wyoming aims to defend Americans against the U.K.’s online regulators.
"The Court's defense of political speech remains essential to American democracy five decades later."
FBI Director Kash Patel pays lip service to the First and Second Amendments while casting suspicion on people who exercise their First or Second Amendment rights.
"The landmark decision recognized that effective political speech requires the ability to pool resources and communicate at scale."
Here's why I believe TikTok.
A friend profiles Buckley himself, a public servant who spent his life defending constitutional first principles.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.