Libel Case Based on Allegations that Plaintiff Had Made Specific Racist Statements Can Go Forward
The plaintiff, Frank Gogol, and the defendant, Malissa White, are both comic book writers.
The plaintiff, Frank Gogol, and the defendant, Malissa White, are both comic book writers.
So holds the Eleventh Circuit, as to dieticians, viewing itself as bound by an earlier decision involving interior designers.
on remand, jury must be instructed that it has to determine (among other things) whether the defendant “reasonably believed the conversation was not confidential.”
even though the video includes a brief appearance by a minor (a friend of plaintiff's).
But the claims against Donald J. Trump, Jr. and Rudy Giuliani are dismissed.
Kokomo officials agree not to enforce ordinance banning “obscene, indecent, or immoral” signs against flag that says “Fuck Biden and fuck you for voting for him.”
According to a former federal prosecutor, the seemingly redundant case sends "the message that the Justice Department won't tolerate this type of racist hatred."
In the new book Free Speech, the Danish activist defends radical self-expression from Socrates to social media.
"The jurors repeatedly assured the Court's law clerk that these notifications had not affected them in any way or played any role whatever in their deliberations."
Plus: Trafficking visas, a new no-fly list?, and more...
"He hath no more law than [a monkey/bull/goose]" vs. slight mischaracterization of legal advice.
N.Y. appellate court reverses the order.
The conservative think tank identifies some genuine concerns about tech companies, but gets the prescription wrong.
The ad was an ad for a college that he had attended.
Nearly 90 gag-order bills would ban schools from teaching the grisly particulars of American history. This activist is fighting against the censorship and for school choice.
The sheriff's deputies are also not entitled to qualified immunity because the First Amendment right to offend police has been repeatedly upheld.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats can be trusted to give an honest account of what happened that day.
"Upon full understanding, I do not view these posters as racist; they are political statements," said university president Mark Wrighton.
This may be especially helpful in cases involving sealing or pseudonymity, where the parties agree with each other but the public interest ought to be represented.
Enforcing that agreement isn’t an unconstitutional prior restraint, holds the Georgia Court of Appeals.
"The peer-review process—not a courtroom—... provides the best mechanism for resolving scientific uncertainties."
The Supreme Court will soon decide a case that tests the limits of expression on government property and religious toleration.