The Congressional Budget Office's Alternative Scenarios Forecast a Dire Economic Picture
Why aren't politicians on both sides more worried than they seem to be?

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections provide valuable insights into how a big chunk of your income is being spent and reveal the long-term consequences of our government's current fiscal policies—you may endure them, and your children most certainly will. Yet, like most other projections looking into our future, these numbers should be taken with a grain of salt. So should claims that CBO projections validate anyone's fiscal track record.
So much can and likely will happen to make projections moot and our fiscal outlook much grimmer. Unforeseen events, economic changes, and policy decisions render them less accurate over time. The CBO knows this and recently released alternative scenarios based on different sets of assumptions, and it doesn't look good. It remains a wonder that more politicians, now given a more realistic range of possibilities, aren't behaving like it.
First, let's recap what the situation looks like under the usual rosy growth, inflation, and interest rate assumptions. Due to continued overspending, this year's deficit will be at least $1.6 trillion, rising to $2.6 trillion by 2034. Debt held by the public equals roughly 99 percent of our economy—measured by gross domestic product (GDP)—annually, heading to 116 percent in 2034.
The only reason these numbers won't be as high as projected last year is that a few House Republicans fought hard to impose some spending caps during the debt ceiling debate. The long-term outlook is even scarier, with public debt reaching 166 percent of GDP in 30 years and all federal debt reaching 180 percent.
No one should be surprised. To be sure, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Great Recession made things worse, but we've been on this path for decades.
Unfortunately, if any of the assumptions underlying these projections change again, things will get a lot worse. That's where the CBO's alternative paths help. Policy makers and the public can better see the potential risks and opportunities associated with various fiscal policy choices, enabling them to make more informed decisions.
For instance, the CBO highlights that if the labor force grows annually by just 0.1 fewer percentage points than originally projected—even if the unemployment rate stays the same—slower economic growth will lead to a deficit $142 billion larger than baseline projections between 2025 and 2034. A similarly small slowdown in the productivity rate would lead to an added deficit of $304 billion over that period.
Back in 2020, the prevalent theory among those who claimed we shouldn't worry about debt was that interest rates were remarkably low and would stay low forever. As if. These guys have since learned what many of us have known for years: that interest rates can and will go up when the situation gets bad enough. So, what happens if rates continue to rise above and beyond those CBO used in its projections? Even a minuscule 0.1-point rise above the baseline would produce an additional $324 billion on the deficit over the 2025-2034 period.
The same is true with inflation, which, as every shopper can see, has yet to be defeated. If inflation, as I fear, doesn't go away as fast as predicted by CBO—largely because debt accumulation is continuing unabated—it will slow growth, increase interest rates, and massively expand the deficit. To be precise, an increase in overall prices of just 0.1 points over the CBO baseline would result in higher interest rates and a deficit of $263 billion more than projected.
Now, imagine all these variations from the current projections happening simultaneously. It's a real possibility. The deficit hike would be enormous, which could then trigger even more inflation and higher interest rates. The question that remains is: Why aren't politicians on both sides more worried than they seem to be?
What needs to happen before they finally decide to treat our fiscal situation as a real threat? President Joe Biden doesn't want to tackle the debt issue. In fact, he's actively adding to the debt with student loan forgiveness, subsidies to big businesses, and other nonsense. Meanwhile, some Republicans pay lip service to our financial crisis, but few are willing to tackle the real problem of entitlement spending.
The time for political posturing is over. The longer we wait to address these issues, the more severe the consequences will be for future generations. It's time for our leaders to prioritize the nation's long-term economic health over short-term political gains and take bold steps toward fiscal responsibility. Only then can we hope to secure a stable and prosperous future for all Americans.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We're trying to "Save Democracy" here, there's no time to worry about the economy!
Sorry de Rugy, but you gave up all credibility when you trashed Trump's economic and immigration policies. You're a leftist marxist fascist leftist leftist now.
Can't resist bringing in Trump.
fftttpppp!
Funny how you never say that to the any of the usual suspects when they make everything about Trump, Babbitt or Biden.
Principals, not principles.
Awe, poor sarc.
Usually directly related to the article or comment. Unlike you trying to cover for the dems.
Youre cries of being called leftist is hilarious by the way after 6 years of you calling people cultists and forever trumpers. It is so pathetic.
Hey Zeb, what do you think sarc’s purpose with this post is?
Pointless shit stirring and baiting.
You don't have to take the bait.
Why don't you all just ignore each other instead of filling up every thread with tiresome bullshit?
Why don’t you all just ignore each other instead of filling up every thread with tiresome bullshit?
^
Dear God, please.
Hear, hear!! So incredibly boring!
We're all paid to be here.
Our reinforcements are on the way.
You and other level headed non combatants will either join us, learn to look the other way, or suffer the same fate as Ken and John and countless others.
Now shut the fuck up you stupid fucking sock puppet faggot RINO/leftist
Because it wouldn't change anything. How often does sarc talk about people he has on mute or who don't respond to him? Just like this thread.
"You all" includes sarc too.
And it would change the number of annoying comments I scroll through.
Just a suggestion. Do what you want.
Do what you want.
Goddamn libertarian.
You're having a bad morning today aren't you buddy.
Leftist, leftist, leftist, Marxist, leftist, leftist, and Spam.
We all know government forecasts and statistics are always accurate.
Buttplug hardest hit. Preferably with a bus.
Start living well below your means and prepare for impact.
I'm too old to try to survive a collapse. I have the means handy to painlessly end my life when the time comes.
^this.
Be a man. Never mind the painless bullshit.
Take at least one with you.
Beat them to death with your walker if you have to, but go down swinging.
Please tell me there's at least one person in your life who would talk you out of that.
If not, give me your zip code and I'll find you one.
I take three different meds to depress my immune system so my body doesn't try to kill my extra kidney. If those stop being available an overdose on something fun will be a far better way to go than slowly dying from kidney failure.