No, Politicians Can't 'Fix' Prices—and That's OK
Price controls lead to the misallocation of resources, shortages, diminished product quality, and black markets.

Prices are threads stitching together the fabric of our economy. They guide countless producers, here and abroad, to meet the most urgent demands of countless consumers. Prices enable the economic coordination of millions of individuals—each with his or her own unique preferences, skills, and resources—with no need for a central planner. They direct entrepreneurs and innovators, signaling where opportunities lie and where resources are most needed.
Prices are guardians of scarce resources, ensuring that these are allocated to their most valuable uses. Prosperity results from the encouragement given to the production of goods and services that people desire most.
There is someone else who sees the price system for its beauty and would like to protect it from continued government interferences: the Cato Institute's Ryan Bourne. He has an excellent new book, The War on Prices: How Popular Misconceptions about Inflation, Prices, and Value Create Bad Policy. It includes 24 essays written by some of the best economists in the business, each addressing a different aspect of today's war on prices—the widespread and counterproductive ways governments are trying to control inflation or particular prices.
The book opens with a discussion about the largest bout of inflation in 40 years. After an explanation of why it's still with us (note: it's not corporate greed or the war in Ukraine), Bourne takes us on a tour of yesterday's bad policy ideas, including wage and price controls implemented under Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and, later, Richard Nixon.
The book then addresses misconceptions about inflation's causes. One of the most frustrating is the notion that the term covers increases in the prices of certain goods or services. In 2021, for instance, we were told for months that the inflation was nothing more than the result of pandemic restrictions on some supply chains. When the war in Ukraine broke out, inflation was then falsely blamed on the resulting rise in oil prices.
But as one contributor, Pierre Lemieux, explains, a change in relative prices—when only the prices of some things rise—is quite different from inflation, which occurs when all prices, including wages, eventually rise. While we can't blame the public for its confusion, economists and politicians have no excuse for ignoring this distinction.
Yet in 2021, the people in charge often failed to see the difference. The Federal Reserve for too long didn't identify the price hikes as inflation. To be sure, there were some shocks to the supply of plenty of things, but these weren't the main reasons all prices were going up. Demand, fueled by government spending and the desire to spend easy money (including all those stimulus checks), was the main culprit. As such, the institution tasked with price stability let inflation run loose and the buying power of each dollar sink for too long.
Part two of Bourne's book is about what tends to come next in times like these: government-imposed price controls. Eamonn Butler reminds us that "government attempts to curb rising prices and wage costs are as old as recorded history." From controls on grain in Fifth Dynasty Egypt, to 1970s energy price controls, to the rent or health care controls we're still accustomed to, politicians of all stripes are frequently tempted to simply declare price hikes unlawful.
But because these are typically cheap attempts to control a symptom of inflation—or to mask poor policies that made something scarce and expensive in the first place—price controls fail spectacularly. They leave in their wake misallocations of resources, shortages, diminished product quality, black markets, and contempt for the law. As the book makes clear, similar problems arise with minimum wage statutes and other government efforts to keep prices and wages artificially high.
The book's last section is on the value judgments driving the war on prices. Whether these be emotion-laden claims that "CEOs are paid too much" or that "rents are too high," they're often the result of uninformed opinion rather than careful economic analyses. In one chapter, my colleague Liya Palagashvili dispels the idea that it's unfair for companies such as Uber or Lyft to charge different prices at different times. What some people see as unfair, economists like Palagashvili see as a way to prevent shortages and long waiting times.
Prices and wages set on market dynamics reflect underlying economic realities and then send out a signal for help. Price controls only mask these realities, which inevitably worsens the economy's ability to respond with what ordinary consumers and workers need.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Federal politicians can help with prices by discontinuing deficit spending.
Read that China is dumping dollars to buy gold and now at a rate four times previous levels. Semi-related, Putin and Xi just met outside at the great hall of the people. They walked side by side to the entrance. Neither needed a spotter and neither took a spill.
The Federal Reserve for too long didn't identify the price hikes as inflation.
I call shenanigans.
They knew full fucking well that inflation was real. They not only zeroed interest rates, they bought massive assets (QE) going from something like 4.2 trillion to 7.5 trillion. The money supply went form 1.7 trillion US Dollars in circulation to 2.3 trillion. They opened up the coffers for lenders and investors.
These are bankers. They knew what they did. The money supply alone was a guarantee of inflation, because that's FUNDAMENTALLY what inflation is.
They knew. But they were more focused on protecting asset valuations than anything else, engineering a "soft landing" and all those things they were saying to try and make it sound gentle, but they aren't stupid. Mendacious, uniformly focused on banks and investor classes, self serving, and probably evil, but not stupid. Every one's an economist, and every one knows exactly what they'd done.
^^ This
The flip-side of the heavy regulation of Banks circa Dodd-Frank is that half our economy (the 11 Too Big to Fail Banks) are now for all intents and purposes branches of the government. The Government now cannot let them fail, and will mobilize every resource at its disposal to meet that end.
Dodd-Frank was pernicious evil.
It made it so that the average Joe couldn’t possibly get a mortgage. I had friends in 2011ish trying to buy a $300-350K condo, had 100K down, and lost several deals because they couldn’t get the mortgage secured and a cash offer came in. That was the practical result of Dodd-Frank and Fanny Mae.
At the same time, all of the banks (except one) who traded in bad mortgages were bailed out, nobody who committed fraud went to jail, and for further punishment the Fed gave them massive capital with QE and near zero rates which they used to buy up assets and housing when prices were relatively cheap. They were basically rewarded for their idiocy, privatized gains, socialized losses.
The Fed is the reason the “economy is doing well” but somehow the average young person feels like they will never retire, never own a house, never do well unless they inherit wealth.
It’s the blue states too. The combination of the Fed and State Governments of free shit and grant paychecks (which are expanding non productive government employment/a Maoist jobs program) is toxic.
The only part of the numbers here I have a question about is how the "money supply" could have only increased by 15% of the value of US T-Bonds which the Fed purchased with dollars backed only by the value of those bonds (in essence printing around $4Trillion during 2020-2022 alone).
I've heard that there's no "official" count of any money supply value below "M3" anymore, but I had always figured that the Fed Balance Sheet value (which went from $800Billion in 2008 to nearly $8Trillion in 2021 or 2022 with a pause at around $4Trillion from 2017-2020) was the functional proxy for the "M1" supply of US currency in the modern paradigm.
Is that an incorrect take on what's passing for reality these days?
I recall very clearly every step in the collectivization of medicine under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The breach in the Constitutional wall pioneered on the thinnest of excuses, pretending that the interstate commerce clause gave Congress the authority to regulate the practice of medicine. The unsupported democratic socialist claims that medical care was too expensive repeated endlessly by the social democrat mass media. The gradual forcing of individual doctors, small clinics and group practices and hospitals into centralized billing and payor groups. The near-total incompetence of CMMS bureaucracy to cope with the operation of the monster they created. The steady decline of doctors with the increasing gap between patient demand and provider shortages. The steady decrease in the numbers of candidates applying to medical schools from ten for each slot down to two, as once-respected doctors were publicly shamed by a narrative of greed and malpractice. And the constant drumbeat of the national narrative that medical treatment cost too much even as the touted remedy not only failed to decrease medical costs but continues to cause steady increases in the cost of medical care. Americans deserve exactly what they voted for. What reason do they now have to complain after democratic socialist officials have given them exactly what they demanded? "We should be more like Europe," they said. And now we are. Not quite as bad as the United Kingdom yet, but soon ... soon ...
^THIS +1000000000000
I recommend the Up series documentary from the UK.
Amazing the USA can have centrally-planned-economy legislation and still keep pretend it's still a USA. [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] have conquered this nation and the consequences will continue until a real USA (defined by the US Constitution) is restored.
The price of pussy is VASTLY inflated!!! I blame the likes of Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer paying Spermy Daniels $130 K!!! Restrain the pussy-grabbing GREED of Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer!!!
We need price cuntrols on pussy, and we need them NOW!!!
I say grab what you can when you can!
Yes, quickly, before prices inflate yet more! Get there before the herds of hoarders get there!
Grab sqrlsy by the pussy?
Nonsense.
Wage and price controls in the seventies nearly brought us to a workers paradise.
If only more people had worn their WIN buttons, we would not have had double digit inflation, double digit interest rates, and double digit unemployment.
Other countries have cheap health care.
What is stopping Hawaii or California from imposing price controls on health care, with death being the penalty if even one penny over the legal price?
California and Hawaii no longer have control over health care prices in their states. Medicare Disservices now controls the purse strings. The only way for California to opt out would be for them to stop accepting any and all federal money. Let me know when that happens, please.
Cash equivalent welfare transfers, based on income, expand the money supply - (cash equivalent) and create inflation also. Banning free market products (energy) does this too. There’s a reason cost of living has exploded.
Free stuff and bans/mandates, grant funded paychecks/jobs programs are incredibly expensive.