Albuquerque Cops Allegedly Got Paid To Make DWI Cases Disappear
The scandal has resulted in the dismissal of some 200 DWI cases, an internal probe, and an FBI investigation.

On a Sunday evening last June, Albuquerque police officer Joshua Montaño pulled Carlos Smith over for speeding near the intersection of Central Avenue and Interstate 21. Smith was contrite. "I apologize," he says in a body camera video. "I was just trying to get over in the lane and get on the freeway. My bad."
Smith got more than a speeding ticket. He was arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI), even though two breath tests indicated that his blood alcohol concentration was below 0.08 percent, the per se cutoff for that charge. Then things got weirder.
The story of what happened next is just one facet of an ongoing corruption scandal at the Albuquerque Police Department (APD). Allegations that cops helped DWI defendants avoid conviction in exchange for payoffs have resulted in the dismissal of some 200 DWI cases, an internal probe, administrative leave for Montaño and four other officers, an FBI investigation, and the execution of search warrants at cops' homes and the office of a local defense attorney.
Montaño, who had removed Smith's Apple Watch and a bracelet during the June 25 traffic stop, left a voicemail message for Smith the next day. "Some of your jewelry was missing from the property from Sunday evening," the officer says in a recording that Smith gave KRQE, the CBS affiliate in Albuquerque. "It looks like the PTC [Prisoner Transport Center] officers didn't put that in your bag, but I have it."
In a subsequent telephone conversation, Smith told KRQE, Montaño said he could retrieve his bracelet from Thomas Clear, an Albuquerque attorney who specializes in DWI cases. During the last six years, KRQE found, Montaño "was named as the officer in at least 36 cases" in which the defendants were represented by Clear, and "nearly 90% of those cases ended in dismissals."
Concerned about Montaño's unusual instructions, Smith did as he was told but recorded the conversation he had with Clear's paralegal, Rick Mendez, at the attorney's office. If Smith decided to hire Clear, Mendez said, "we charge $8,500," and "you could do it in payments." He conceded that "we're not the cheapest." But if Smith settled for a public defender, Mendez warned, the outcome of his case would be a "roll of the dice."
Smith wanted to know what he could expect in exchange for Clear's steep fee. "With you representing me, that would guarantee that this doesn't go on my record?" he asked. "Yes," Mendez replied.
That promise was a red flag, Leon Howard, the deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico, told KRQE. "That violates our professional code of conduct," he said. "You do not guarantee outcomes."
Howard is planning a lawsuit that he said would shed light on the corruption that the APD and the FBI are investigating. "It's shocking and quite frankly disgusting," he said. "This scheme perpetuates a narrative that outcomes can be bought and sold. It undermines our entire justice system."
Smith took a three-part field sobriety test prior to his arrest, and Montaño ostensibly was unsatisfied by the results. But it's not clear why. While the horizontal gaze nystagmus test (which involves visually tracking a moving object) is a reliable measure of intoxication, performance on the walk-and-turn test and the one-leg stand test varies widely even for sober drivers. The fact that breath tests put Smith's blood alcohol level below 0.08 percent, coupled with the fact that prosecutors ultimately dropped the DWI charge, suggests the arrest was not justified.
"It was the most traumatic experience I've ever had in my entire life," Smith told KRQE. "I was lost and super confused. I didn't know what to do. So I had no choice but to proceed and do what he asked….I can't understand how a person can abuse their power that way." He said the DWI arrest "ruined relationships with his family members and led to him losing his job."
Other DWI cases that may have been compromised by corruption involved defendants less sympathetic than Smith. Early in the morning on August 24, the Albuquerque Journal reports, Officer Honorio Alba Jr. pulled over a black Toyota sedan that had been "speeding south on Interstate 25 without its headlights on," going 83 miles per hour in a 55-mph zone. Alba later reported that the Toyota "nearly struck another car" while changing lanes. After the car left the highway, it drove onto a sidewalk.
Alba said the driver, Antonio Barron, had bloodshot eyes and smelled of alcohol. Barron refused to take a breath test. But instead of arresting Barron, Alba put him "in contact with a specific attorney, possibly named 'Rick,' who if hired, would ensure that no court case would be filed," 2nd Judicial District Court Executive Officer Katina Watson reported in a November 3 letter to Albuquerque's Civilian Police Oversight Agency. Watson, who apparently learned about the case because Barron was a former court employee, was alerting the agency to "questionable conduct" by Alba. Watson's letter, the Journal reports, triggered an internal APD investigation.
"Records show Alba didn't file charges against Barron until 10 weeks after pulling him over," the paper says. "Arresting officers typically file criminal complaints and a citation within a day of making a DUI arrest." The charge against Barron, which came eight days after Watson's letter, "was filed in an unorthodox way, via a one-page DWI citation with the word 'summons' at the bottom."
Barron's case is one of nearly 200 that prosecutors have dropped because they could not trust the testimony of the arresting officers. "It makes me sick to my stomach," Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman told KRQE, "but I have no choice. My prosecutorial ethics require me to dismiss these cases."
In addition to Montaño and Alba, three other members of the APD's DWI unit—Officer Harvey Johnson Jr., Officer Nelson Ortiz, and Lt. Justin Hunt—have been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the internal investigation. "APD has been working with the FBI for the past several months on an investigation involving members of the department," an APD spokesman revealed last month. "Due to the sensitive nature of the investigation, some officers have been placed on administrative leave, and others will be temporarily reassigned within the department. APD leadership is working closely with the FBI to ensure a complete and thorough investigation can be completed."
As part of the FBI investigation, the Associated Press reported this month, "search warrants were recently served at the homes of officers who had worked with the DWI unit." KRQE notes that Clear's office was "raided by federal agents last month."
Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina spoke in generalities about the investigations at a press conference on February 2. He noted that DWI cases often are dismissed when officers are unavailable to testify, an outcome that defense attorneys can make more likely by seeking trial delays. "Systems that struggle, systems that have loopholes, are really open to corruption," Medina said. "We're dealing with stuff that we anticipate started decades ago, and we've done a lot of things that have got us to this point. But we will continue to dig and look and leave no stone unturned and make sure that we get to the bottom of this."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
When asset forfeiture doesn't bring in enough, a poor cop has to do something - - - - - --
On the plus side, the Better Call Saul fanfiction just writes itself.
Yup. Albuquerque! Where statues regarding real history are torn down and TV drug making fiction statues are put up.
Asset forfeiture is now illegal in New Mexico absent a conviction so cops have to pay for their drugs and call girls some other way. Albuquerque cops have a long and well-documented history of corruption and of killing suspects. I guess it’s easier to just shoot them than to gather evidence and convict them. On the plus side, they aren’t racists, they’re out to destroy everyone on an equal opportunity basis.
>>Clear's paralegal, Rick Mendez
unethical attorneys not even man enough to do the unethic-ing themselves are the worst of all.
Cops like this don't hire themselves. Albuquerque's voters should demand the entire house be cleaned out.
In most cities the best voters can do is vote in better city council members and maybe a mayor if they aren't an appointed Mayor model. Police Chiefs are hired and their union makes them damn near unfireable.
Besides, the voters will think if they aren't drinking and driving they don't have to worry. Understanding the real dangers of this is TLDR material.
Sounds like 200 bribery cases to me.
Extortion, rather than bribery
All the little cop nerds are loser reject little Maga twerps, no suprise there
Your name is arrest maga fascists.
How do you plan to arrest people for.disagreeing with your politics if you don't buddy up to the police, who do the arresting.
It's KAR/DOL again. After taking a hiatus to go shoot Mormons, steal valor and dox the families of dead cops, he's back to troll even harder.
Now there's a jackass comment, fueled by jealousy and hate.
At least you didn't manage to spell "fascist" correctly.
But I'm sure you know exactly what you're going on about.
Sure.
Fascist*, you moron.
It is both dumdum. Both sides entered into the agreement.
The characteristic of extortion is that both sides agree after one side has been extorted.
"If you don't pay us, we'll go to trial" is extortion. Arguably, implicit in extortion by police is a later payment of a bribe, but the bribe is not voluntary and it's misleading to characterise merely as a bribe a payment that is procured by extortion.
But we can at least agree that the police and lawyer involved are despicable scum.
Knoxville does this. Judge bribed with new appliances from a local dealer on first DUI. On second DUI, appliances went to Chilhowee Zoo. This was a while back but it's doubtful things have changed.
<On a Sunday evening last June, Albuquerque police officer Joshua Montaño pulled Carlos Smith over for speeding near the intersection of Central Avenue and Interstate 21.
Typo: it's I-25 (and I-40) that runs through Albuquerque, not I-21.
The irritiating part is that city really does have a bad drunk driving problem. "I'm too drunk to walk home, let's drive," is something of an cultural in-joke by the locals, and I think I remember reading somewhere that more drunk driving wrecks happen there between the hours of 10 pm and 3 am than any other city.
Officers don't need to be running bribery rackets to catch these folks.
Quite correct. I've driven it north many times into Colorado. As for the drunk driving, the main driver is the high population of Indians in the area. Rt 666 near Gallup to the west had it's route number changed and was popularly known as The Devils Highway or Satan's Road. It had the highest number of drunk driving fatalities in the US
.
even though two breath tests indicated that his blood alcohol concentration was below 0.08 percent, the per se cutoff for that charge.
This is interesting to me. I’ve heard this about a number of states.
My understanding of the Wisconsin (where I live) DUI statute is that it is not alcohol specific. They can nail you for being impaired by prescription medications or an overdose of over the counter antihistamines. A breathalyzer result over the limit is almost a guaranteed conviction, but the reverse is not true. Even a 0.0 on the breathalyzer is not a guaranteed acquittal.
Breathalyzers are notoriously inaccurate. The measurement is “blood alcohol level”. There shouldn’t be a case without a blood sample being taken. Breathalyzers don’t only measure Ethyl Alcohol they measure certain Methyl Groups. A friend of mine was a Township Cop. One day we were patching a hole in the hull of his fiberglass boat. We got done and I asked if he wanted to go for a beer. He declined saying that he had to do a dog and pony show for a local Boy Scout group about Drunk Driving. I told him at the time to NOT let them talk him into blowing into the breathalyzer. The following weekend when we were finishing his boat he asked me why I told him not to blow into the breathalyzer? He did blow into it and blew a 1.1. The chemicals we were using on his boat can be absorbed through the skin and outgas through the lungs. MEK, Isopropyl Alcohol, Gasoline, Naptha, Toulene and others, if they are in your system can cause a breathalyzer reading. Hospitals use alcohol based hand sanitizers. A nurse working an 8 hour shift can blow a .06 walking out the door. If there’s no requirement for a blood test, almost any nurse can be prosecuted for DUI without having a drink. This goes for other professions as well. Painters, autobody mechanics, some industrial workers.
In New Mexico there are two ways to convict of DUI alcohol. "Per se" is when the BAC is .08 or over. The other way is "impaired to the slightest degree", which doesn't require any BAC level or test at all. So even if you blow a, say, .04, you can be convicted under the impaired to the slightest degree prong. A lot of people are surprised when they find that out, usually the hard way. And, even if you blow a 0, the cops can say they "suspect drugs," and if you were stupid enough to tell them that you took antibiotics yesterday, well then you've "admitted to drug use" and may be headed to jail.
Basically, the rule is "if the cop wants you to go to jail, then you go to jail," and the skids are greased for convictions.
Well, aren't those cops some creative financing types. Inflation eating up paychecks, folks need to get creative with money making.
I hear meth isn't too hard to make. All I need to do is keep a reserve of cash to pay off the cops. Also I'd have to move to Alberquerque, I hear they have a lot of respect for meth dealers. They put up statues to them from what I've read.
“Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina spoke in generalities about the investigations at a press conference on February 2. He noted that DWI cases often are dismissed when officers are unavailable to testify, an outcome that defense attorneys can make more likely by seeking trial delays.”
So, it’s turtles all the way up.
When the police officers involved and the attorneys involved are arrested, prosecuted and sentenced, the JUDGE MUST give the highest sentence allowable by law as the attorneys were officers of the court and the police officers of the law. Unless they get the highest sentence and the longest probation after there is no signal being sent that this is not acceptable at all.
As to the sentencing, it must also include GENERAL POPULATION as these men were never attorneys or police, they were JUST CRIMINALS and thieves and committed schemes to defraud based upon the power of a badge. They must be in general population ONLY and never protected in any way from the GP.
As someone over 65, they can not use a field sobriety tests legally as they have been proven completely unreliable by age (statistically proven). This leaves the breathalyzer and if legal under state laws blood tests for drugs. However, many drugs can be detected days, or weeks after inoculation (*notice I did not say use, as a neighbor can smoke MJ and you can have it in your system from many secondary causes, and many drugs and even herbs and spices can give false positives).
Rx Drugs that are used generally caution against dangerous machinery and not driving or against both. Some of those can have side affects in SOME people a not others. Length of use is a factor in most cases. Examples are times when alcoholics PASS field sobriety and are given the blow test (which is contra-indicated if they passed sobriety) and they fail miserably. While their reaction times may not be as good a a non-alcoholic many function at "normal" level while intoxicated and do NOT do so when dry.
This is all very confusing and rife with abuse by authorities. Generally when a cop decides you are going to jail is when they first look at you or even before that. In this case the cop was getting kick backs and deserves to be in prison for about 20 years in general population!
Police are on the take !
I'm shocked !
Shocked, I tell you.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/02/dirtbag_fbi_agent_charged_with_stealing_from_january_6_defendant.html
"Dirtbag FBI agent charged with stealing from January 6 defendant"
"A Houston college student prosecuted for his participation in the Jan. 6 insurrection was one of people robbed by a Houston-based FBI agent, according to newly released court records.
Alexander Fan's complaint about missing cash and silver helped lead to the January indictment of FBI agent Nicholas Anthony Williams, according to court records.
Fan, 27, was sentenced to 12 months probation in connection to the riot. Fan was found guilty of entering and remaining a room in the Capitol building. He was accused of climbing into an office through a broken window after his entry was blocked by a closed door."
Fan was found guilty of entering and remaining a room in the Capitol building.
Should have said he was Antifa and was just there late to protest the Kavanagh confirmation.
Police are underpaid. How else do you expect them to pay the bills in Biden's America?
Isn't this basically what lawyers and judges do all the time? Charges dropped on the condition of paying money here or there and volunteering at some "charity" that just so happens to be tied to the judge or lawyers