Shane Mauss: Is the End of the Drug War Inevitable?
Comedian Shane Mauss on the democratization of mushrooms, LSD, cannabis, DMT, and ketamine

"I never pictured a world where marijuana would be anywhere close to legal, and it's mind-blowing to me that mushrooms are being decriminalized everywhere," says Shane Mauss, a comedian who tours the country discussing his psychedelic experiences. For the 2018 documentary Psychonautics, he consumed a wide variety of substances on camera, from ayahuasca to LSD to ketamine to DMT, a smokable drug known to provoke especially strong hallucinations in which users sometimes encounter cartoonish "entities." Mauss also hosts a science podcast called Here We Are, where he shares his thoughts about the mainstreaming of psychedelic drugs, the surprising pace of legalization efforts, and the role that podcaster Joe Rogan and other public figures play in normalizing psychedelics.
In June, Reason's Nick Gillespie caught up with Mauss at the Psychedelic Science 2023 conference in Denver. Attended by a reported 13,000 people, the conference was organized by the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), a nonprofit that is in the final stages of gaining Food and Drug Administration approval for the use of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD.
Reason: What does the psychedelic renaissance mean to you?
Mauss: I don't know what the psychedelic renaissance means to me. I can tell you that as someone who was born in 1980 and experienced much of the Reagan-era "just say no to drugs," early '90s PSAs, the frying egg and this-is-your-brain-on-drugs stuff, I never pictured a world where marijuana would be anywhere close to legal, and it's mind-blowing to me that mushrooms are being decriminalized everywhere.
Even when I started my science podcast eight years ago, the [only] organization even attempting to jump through all of the regulatory hoops to just test psychedelics in any way at all was MAPS, which was much smaller even eight years ago. And now there's Johns Hopkins and Stanford and a zillion universities are getting into it.
What do you think changed?
I don't know if this is just what progress looks like and it's inevitable? I know I didn't see this coming. Maybe the war on drugs was such a horrible policy in the first place that it was never going to last.
What do you like about psychedelics?
Psychedelics just changed my life. I did them as kind of a goof when I was a teenager, to be a rebel or whatever. I had smoked weed and laughed about it and thought it was great, but psychedelics were something more meaningful for me. I always had pretty serious depression issues from the age of 10 years old, and [psychedelics] were something that really helped with that. Mushrooms were my all-time favorite, my go-to for a very, very long time. And I think if it weren't for DMT, I probably wouldn't have a science podcast. I was always interested in how the mind worked.
Can you describe your experience with DMT?
I was raised in a strict religious household. I didn't fit into that. I was always an atheist, especially in my younger years. I was a very angry, bitter atheist. To have a DMT experience, it seems like you're talking with entities or in some other world. Or is this the afterlife? Or is this some other dimension? That is the subjective feeling of a lot of experiences. It made me go: "How could I perceive something like that?" By the end of it, I actually don't think I was in some other dimension. I think it was in my brain.
So then the question is, how would a brain make a perception that is so different from this conscious experience? It just got me really digging into how the subconscious mind works in neuroscience, and it was incredibly impactful for me over and over again. I started doing ketamine a few years ago and other than falling and scraping my face, it's been nothing but really interesting. [Gestures at red marks on his face.] This looks much worse than it is.
If anyone watches my documentary Psychonautics, they'll see I think I have a balanced take on psychedelics. I have a lot of inherent disclaimers. You can look at this face and go: "Well, maybe I should pause before doing ketamine outside of a nightclub so I don't fall over."
What are the parts of the psychedelic community that you like the most?
I did psychedelics alone for a very long time until I started experimenting with doing a psychedelics show. I think 2015 was when I first started doing a few of those. Once I started meeting the people that would come out to a psychedelic comedy show, they weren't the cliché—burned-out, dreadlocked hair, and their only hygiene was a sound bath—type. It was never like that. Sometimes I'd have like one table of burnouts, a bunch of clichés, but you would just meet the most interesting, intelligent people.
I've been doing science shows for years, and it can be tough sledding sometimes, getting people to have the attention span to listen to jokes about biology. I remember the very first time that I did a show about psychedelics, the engagement was overwhelming. Afterward, there was a line of people. I've been a successful comedian since 2004 and I've been on Late Night and everything else. If you do a psychedelic comedy show, there is a line of people that has a million questions and they're meeting each other in line and connecting. The psychedelic community is just so inquisitive and so open.
What are the parts of the psychedelic community you find objectionable?
I did a 111-city psychedelic comedy tour that ended in 2017. It was the greatest tour of my life. I loved meeting people every show. I loved going to festivals. Then COVID happened. As someone who interviews virologists and epidemiologists, the insane, not just conspiracies, but anger and harassment that I saw anyone doing any kind of science face, it certainly opened my eyes to some of the problematic errors in thinking within the community, some of the magical thinking, and a lot of the grifting in the space. Granted, this is the internet and you're seeing the worst of the worst cases.
There's a lot of pretty dubious supplements and things like that are being peddled and treatments and telling people you can cure their cancer with coffee enemas and stuff like that.
Is Joe Rogan a purveyor of psychedelic misinformation?
Absolutely. I've been on Joe Rogan's show. I find him to be a good interviewer and a nice guy. And Alex Jones is one of his best friends. It's just his shtick: "Oh, did the aliens make the pyramids?" It's a little discouraging for someone who likes science [that when] I watch Animal Planet, Finding Bigfoot is the most popular show. Or when I try to watch the History Channel to learn something, Ancient Aliens is the most popular show on there.
On Joe Rogan's show, a way to get on there is to have some big controversial idea or something like that. I think that he ends up subjected to a lot of grifters and a lot of people that are telling him what he already wants to hear and dressing it up as some sciencey-sounding thing.
Do you think the psychedelic community is more open to conspiracist thinking or anti-science thinking?
I find the psychedelic community to be very intelligent. I would say that because of the nature of it being such an underground thing, I think it has drawn people that are unconventional, that maybe don't like authority as much, which is great. I think we should absolutely be questioning science and authorities and laws all of the time. I very much support that.
Sometimes it's like a race to see who can have the most far-out idea because there are a lot of creative people in the space, and you want to get attention for your ideas and advertise your ideas. Some of those more far-out ideas are sexier and more tantalizing than reality for some people. I think reality is very interesting. Some people think reality is very boring.
Are psychedelics becoming normalized in our culture?
I started comedy in 2004. I was like a typical late-night, short-joke, absurdist comedian. I've always been interested in psychedelics, so even back then I would sprinkle in a few psychedelic jokes here and there. I found that if I did a regular comedy club, I could do five minutes of psychedelic jokes and it would be funny. Usually they were goofy ones, like I ate too many mushrooms. And if I talked about them too much more than that, you would start getting funny looks.
I had all of these deals potentially in the works and ran into all sorts of barriers at Showtime and HBO not wanting to anymore. They didn't have a problem talking about drugs; they had a problem talking about potential benefits. It was talking about psychedelics as medicines that was very taboo to them. They wouldn't touch it. When Michael Pollan's book [How to Change Your Mind] came out, that was the first time there was a psychedelic book on the front of almost every bookstore in the country.Pollan's book opened the doors for others. And for all of my criticisms of people like Aaron Rodgers, or someone that might be peddling a bunch of anti-science nonsense, it's still awesome to have someone huge, like a [future] NFL Hall of Famer, praising psychedelics. There are pros and cons to it.
What do you think the benefits would be to society where psychedelic use is just normalized?
That's a really interesting question because I'm not exactly one of those people that's like, "If you just put LSD in the drinking water and everyone did LSD, the world would be peace and love." I've seen the negative effects of psychedelics. I've been to a psych ward twice myself. I know that psychedelics aren't perfect. The very things that can help some people's mental health can hurt others. I have mixed feelings on making everything legal, but the war on drugs is a horrible failure. I don't know what else there is to do but just get rid of the absurd laws around them.
It will make me nervous when people are doing psychedelics more and more willy-nilly because there's unexpected things. I mean, marijuana changed my life. I no longer like the stuff. But I had such a beautiful few-year run with marijuana. I loved it. I never saw marijuana being legalized. I was thrilled, even though it's no longer my cup of tea. Thrilled to see it go so legal and get so popular. My grandma, I think, did CBD. My God, I never saw that coming.
Are you worried about the psychedelic community as it becomes more mainstream?
I'm not about being the cool kid hipster about psychedelics. I'm thrilled to see more and more scientific organizations getting to be a part of it. I have more pause about some of the influencer community out there and some of the wellness community.
If you project 20–40 years into the future, where things have been psychedelicized, what's that world look like?
I think that people [will] have more options, even to just escape reality, responsibility, or whatever, even in more reckless use of things than just drinking their faces off every day. I think there's a correlation between younger people not drinking as much, and I think part of that has to do with marijuana and some of these other substances becoming more normalized. There [are] lots more alternatives for people. Even the lowest bar of that is less drunk driving, less alcoholism. I think there will be a lot of excitement for a while, and hopefully 40 years from now this will just be commonplace.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome9.com
Is Joe Rogan a purveyor of psychedelic misinformation?
"Absolutely, and here's two paragraphs of commentary that don't back that statement up at all."
Standard article construction for this site these days.
"Here's a leading question, now help me attack a famous interviewer for giving a platform to a huge range of topics and concepts instead of carefully curated establishment narratives like I do." - Nick Gillespie
But Nick's a radical who's not frightened of controversy either. Just look at him talk about drugs approvingly in 2023. Far out.
Radical within established boundaries. A Rebel with an advertisable Cause. Speaker of Truths that are uncomfortable to a small percentage of people.
An abstract impressonist painter-by-numbers.
An ideological extremist crossing guard.
Comforting the comfortable, afflicting the afflicted. Boldly speaking power to truth.
An adventurous traveler to popular places .
Nick strikes me as the kinda guy who still goes to high schoolers' parties
He shows up wearing a New York Dolls t-shirt.
Ha! Classic.
I've seen the negative effects of psychedelics. I've been to a psych ward twice myself.
Yeah, no thanks, but you go right ahead.
Yes, I noticed that ass well!
Can I PLEASE get health insurance at a discount, and EXCLUDE coverage of booze and drugs addiction "therapy", and visits to the shrink bin to drag me back out of my "bad trips"? And liver transplants for severe alcohol junkies?
We all know that the answer to this kind of question is "Hell no!!! You will pay for ALL of the shit that results from the bad personal choices of others, whether you like shit, or not!"
Bingo... Why every [Na]tional So[zi]alist empire has lock-step marching orders instead of Individual Liberty.
If the 60's hippies who are in power now won't legalize drugs, nobody will.
Biden was a hippy? Groovy.
https://apnews.com/article/derek-chauvin-george-floyd-prison-stabbing-f24cde6aa28877d034530c2dc40ef7ea
Ex-officer Derek Chauvin, convicted in George Floyd’s killing, was stabbed in prison, AP source says
The last thing the current establishment wants is his conviction getting reexamined. If he dies the impetus wouldn't be there.
Could not agree more. My thought as well.
They will Jack Ruby his ass.
Yeah. He's not the Epstein type.
True, he doesn't have dirt on the Clintons.
Perhaps he will be forced to participate in the theatrical version where Alec Baldwin would be shooting on location with him.
This is my shocked expression.
In November 2022, an inmate at the facility’s low-security prison camp pulled out a gun and attempted to shoot a visitor in the head. The weapon, which the inmate shouldn’t have had, misfired and no one was hurt.
Love that disclaimer, letting us that inmates in federal prison aren’t supposed to have guns.
Also, does misfire mean it went off at the wrong time or didn’t fire at all?
They can only have guns that were in use in 1789.
It's hilarious how worthless Nick's life is.
Like a child, no focus on anything other than drugs.
Lolberts stay jacking off.
Nothing that grants government powers will truly ever end. If there is a path to power or utilize against enemies, government will retain it in some manner. You see this with the regulatory state, obscure laws, and even legal construction of unrelated laws to go after people and enemies.
As long as a politician can benefit, they won't end it.
Meant this as a non response. Sorry nardz. Bad click.
I do find it telling that the guy you're most respectful to in the comments is the guy who wants to murder everyone who votes differently than you.
Nah, he's not respectful to you mate.
Nardz isn't a dem defending neocon retard like yourself lol. He also doesn't play victim anytime his argument is shown to be bullshit. He can have a discussion and talk his assertions through. The opposite of you.
This is a weird complaint from you as you have threatened to fight half the ckmmenters here before you chicken out like a bitch. Lol.
Nardz is just a more honest version of Jesse.
Like you know anything about honesty
We don't call him Lying Jeffy for nothing.
chemjeff radical individualist 17 mins ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Are you going to provide an answer? Why should I even pretend to care about being honest with you? You lie about me all the time. You accuse me of horrible things. Why shouldn’t I treat you the same way you treat me?
Apparently accusing Jeff of advocating horrible things because he constantly advocates horrible things, gives him license to lie about others.
Oh, why don't you call me a Nazi again. That is so amusing. But this time, why don't you provide some evidence for your claim that I'm a Nazi.
Oh wait, you're not going to provide any evidence THIS TIME, either? So your calling me a Nazi, is just childish name calling, like every other time? And a particularly reprehensible version of that while we are at it?
Why should I treat you with any sort of respect or decency when you treat me like scum? Why do you think you deserve it?
You’re not a Nazi. I imagine even they had standards.
All good.
Though I was wondering where you were going for a minute
You forgot immigration.
Legal immigration or importing serfs in the back door?
There may be a few here that want undocumented adolescent males to slide in the back door.
The end of Prohibition, and the reduction of the War on Weed in some states shows this quite clearly.
Weed will never be "legalized" in the sense that I mean the word, which is "removed from the law books". People can't just sell it (though I suppose these days you can't really "just sell" much of anything) but rather have to get numerous onerous permits, there needs to be inventory tracking all the way from cultivation to sale, the cultivators themselves have to have all sorts of licensing to do so, etc.
Alcohol is under possibly slightly less draconian regulation, but it's still not just a "brew it (or distill it) and sell it" sort of affair.
And as you say, having collected that power, the government will never relinquish it. Hell, even as a rather radical libertarian, it's difficult for me to imagine people regaining the right to simply make and sell bread although given the origin of the term "Baker's dozen" I suppose that's not a new development either. It's frankly a bit astonishing, all of the things we let them get away with commanding every last aspect of.
Imagine the day when adult men that dress in burlesque women’s clothing, then insist on visiting a school or a library where the bottoms of random children are seated on top of the drag queen’s crotch while a story is read, are required to obtain a professional license that includes thousands of hours of coursework and continuing education requirements.
You can’t just have kids on their laps talking about the first thing that pops up.
“legalized” in the sense that I mean the word, which is “removed from the law books”.
Yes, people use the terms "legalized" and "decriminalized" backwards.
That is my thought on the matter as well. To me, "decriminalized" means "the laws are still on the books, but we won't arrest you for it any more". I guess I can see how some people might take "legalized" as "made specifically legal through a regulation" but to me, "legal" is the default so you don't actually need a regulation to make something so.
It's simple if you just keep it to what the words themselves say. "Legalize" means "make legal", i.e. not illegal. It says nothing one way or another as to what regulatory conditions might attach.
"Decriminalize" means "make it not be a crime". It might still be illegal, but only a civil violation.
Fine. "Destatute", then?
https://twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1728061448604041310?t=C4IQpgRxqf2lOWiAGYJnGw&s=19
The idea that humans are replaceable and that the free movement of workers is beneficial is not just wrong--it is catastrophically wrong. Changing the demographics changes the culture. Changing the demographics changes the politics. Changing the demographics changes the country.
https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1728119428317933649?t=mka6pw7ycbNU8Amw7BzkaA&s=19
The Irish government has reacted to the stabbing of children outside a primary school in Dublin by a man of Algerian origin by preparing new laws to punish those who are angry about it.
[Link]
I see that they're taking the Rotherham approach.
https://raweggnationalist.substack.com/p/a-few-observations-about-the-situation
Here’s what Varadkar said:
To all those cowardly “champions of Ireland” who took to the streets of Dublin last night, let me say one thing. Ask your sisters, ask your friends, ask everyone you know, what they fear most on our streets. They’re afraid of you. Afraid of your anger and rage, afraid of your violence, your hate and how you blame others for your problems.
As a government we will be relentless in protecting our citizens and defending our people. The Gardai will be on the streets in large numbers and will do whatever it takes to fight back waves of ignorance and criminality. The Minister of Justice will coordinate with the Commissioner to ensure we never witness such terrible scenes as the 23rd of November 2023 ever again.
Too bad they didn’t stop the stabbing.
Were the children immodestly dressed?
Nah. Just white.
They should have known better than to go around while white.
"Is Joe Rogan a purveyor of psychedelic misinformation?"
Ugh, why does Reason insist on playing gatekeeper to The Science! (tm)? It comes off especially petty when it is Reason taking shots at their competitors.
Get this: Reason is promoting a COMIC as an authority in order to pass judgement on whether or not another COMIC (who happens to run a competing media empire) is a good representative of The Science! (tm).
I still conflate him in my mind with Fred Roggin.
Had to google Fred Roggin. My research revealed that he and Joe Rogan were never seen in the same place at the same time. Looks to me like a Clark Kent scenario.
It's because they're stoned.
"I was a very angry, bitter atheist."
If the ones here are any example that seems to be par for the course.
Mammary-Farter-Fuhrer, go look in the mirror at Your Perfect Self, and ask Yourself an honest question: "Am I party to be blamed for some people hating 'God' and religion?"
Book "Holy Horrors" https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1573927783/reasonmagazinea-20/
Mammary-Necrophilia-Farter-Fuhrer, Supreme Demonic Director of Decay, Destruction, and Death, will now SPEAK! HARKKK silently and RESPECTFULLY, all ye lowly heathens, as She Directs Death, and announces WHICH few of us MIGHT deserve to live, and WHO all deserves to DIE-DIE-DIE!!!
https://reason.com/2022/01/25/did-these-three-officers-willfully-deprive-george-floyd-of-his-constitutional-rights/?comments=true#comment-9323626
“You should really join ᛋᛋqrlsy, ᛋᛋhrike. You two goosestepping fascists offing yourselves would definitely be a mitzvah.”
-Quote MammaryBahnFuhrer the "Expert Christian Theologian", AKA Mother’s Lament, with a head full of cement
So Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer, Supreme Demonic Director of Decay, Destruction, and Death... WHEN are You going to STOP stealing the IDs of Your victims, and then posting kiddie porn in THEIR names, and then blaming THEM?
Inquiring minds want to KNOW, dammit!
"ask Yourself an honest question: “Am I party to be blamed for some people hating ‘God’ and religion?”
Does Sqrlsy think I'm God or the Dali Lama or something?
Why the hell would I affect peoples perception of Shinto, Daoism or Christianity?
"Does Sqrlsy think I’m God or the Dali Lama or something?"
No! Mammary-Farter-Fuhrer thinks that SHE is God or the Dali Lama or Jesus or some such! Bat the Bat-Shit-Crazy VERY-HAIRY least, She thinks that She is the Queen of the Internet Cesspools! MASTER Mistress of the Correct Purse, Hairstyle, and Whorestyle!
"Why the hell would I affect peoples perception of Shinto, Daoism or Christianity?"
MANY sane people look at the likes of Perfect Theologian God-Fearing humans, such ass PERFECT Mammary-Necrophilia-Assed-Farter-Fuhrer... and conclude... If THAT is "God-Fearing", then I want NOTHING to do with shit!!!
"MANY sane people look at the likes of Perfect Theologian God-Fearing humans, such ass PERFECT Mammary-Necrophilia-Assed-Farter-Fuhrer… and conclude… If THAT is “God-Fearing”"
So you think I'm some sort of religious leader or icon? Hate to break it to you, Greasy, but I haven't sat in a religious service for probably a decade.
And even then I'm far less ignorant about peoples beliefs than you. The number of topics that you pontificate on but know shit about is astounding.
I know benevolence when I see it! And I know EVIL when I see shit!
Mammary-Necrophilia-Farter-Fuhrer, Supreme Demonic Director of Decay, Destruction, and Death, will now SPEAK! HARKKK silently and RESPECTFULLY, all ye lowly heathens, as She Directs Death, and announces WHICH few of us MIGHT deserve to live, and WHO all deserves to DIE-DIE-DIE!!!
https://reason.com/2022/01/25/did-these-three-officers-willfully-deprive-george-floyd-of-his-constitutional-rights/?comments=true#comment-9323626
“You should really join ᛋᛋqrlsy, ᛋᛋhrike. You two goosestepping fascists offing yourselves would definitely be a mitzvah.”
-Quote MammaryBahnFuhrer the "Expert Christian Theologian", AKA Mother’s Lament, with a head full of cement
Conservaturds making friends, gathering votes, and influencing people by... PEDDLING KOOL-AID AND SUICIDE!!! How's it workin' for ya, servant and serpent of the Evil One?
EvilBahnFuhrer, drinking EvilBahnFuhrer Kool-Aid in a spiraling vortex of darkness, cannot or will not see the Light… It’s a VERY sad song! Kinda like this…
He’s a real Kool-Aid Man,
Sitting in his Kool-Aid Land,
Playing with his Kool-Aid Gland,
His Hero is Jimmy Jones,
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jim-Jones
Loves death and the dying moans,
Then he likes to munch their bones!
He’s truly, completely a necrophiliac,
His brain, squirming toad-like, is REALY, really whack!
Has no thoughts that help the people,
He wants to turn them all to sheeple!
On the sheeple, his Master would feast,
Master? A disaster! Just the nastiest Beast!
Kool-Aid man, please listen,
You don’t know, what you’re missin’,
Kool-Aid man, better thoughts are at hand,
The Beast, to LEAVE, you must COMMAND!
“You should really join ᛋᛋqrlsy, ᛋᛋhrike. You two goosestepping fascists offing yourselves would definitely be a mitzvah.”
Have you ever found anyone who disagrees with me?
Go ask your wife and kids, I bet they'd be all for it.
A helpful book is to be found here: M. Scott Peck, Glimpses of the Devil
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1439167265/reasonmagazinea-20/
Hey EvilBahnFuhrer …
If EVERYONE who makes you look bad, by being smarter and better-looking than you, killed themselves, per your wishes, then there would be NO ONE left!
Who would feed you? Who’s tits would you suck at, to make a living? WHO would change your perpetually-smelly DIAPERS?!!?
You’d better come up with a better plan, Stan!
When you die, M. Scott Peck is going to kick your ass for using his books to tell lies and act like a devil.
Hey Mamma the Highly Esteemed, Expert Christian Theologian!
https://reason.com/2021/03/24/for-the-first-time-a-majority-of-republicans-support-same-sex-marriage/
Have You figured out yet, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? I am waiting with bated breath!
Also, how is Your Followership building up? I mean, for Your “Expert Theologians for Worshipful Methods of Identity Theft”? Where do we subscribe to Your Newsletter?
Hear, hear, HEAR ye the self-righteous preachings of MammaryBahnFuhrer! (Imported below). She knows JUST the right “Popular-with-the-Cool-Kids-in-Her-Own-Mind” theology to espouse, along with wearing JUST the right purse, hairstyle, whorestyle, and other accessories! Meanwhile, in the EXACT same source, She engaged in identity theft! Her heart, in truth, is a ravening black hole of hypocrisy, greedy self-righteousness, and other evils!
Now, the preachings of The Great Mammary. Note that She picks the verses that say that the right BELIEFS and whorestyles get you “in” with the “in” crowd, and then you’re free to engage in ID theft and other evils, at will!
Mammary-style whorestyles - preachings below:
It amazes me how Americans living in a purportedly Christian culture don't even understand the basic tenets of its theology.
Pretty much the whole point of Christianity is that everyone has sinned and is worthy of damnation so God became a human and took our punishment for us. And the libertarian angle is, that you still have a choice to accept or reject the gift already given.
Ephesians 2:8-9 ESV: For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
Romans 6:23 ESV: For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
John 3:16-17 ESV: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.
(End of Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer-style preachings.)
We can pick and chose our Bible verses to justify ANY evils we WANT TO justify! And YOU equate "fashionable theology to justify ANY evil shit that I want to do" with Your fashionable hairstyle and whorestyle! Got the right fashionable BELIEFS, and so then The Queen can do WHATEVER She wants! Your BELIEFS will protect You from the consequences of Your evil actions? Do You not GET this, Oh Fashionable Queen of the Internet Cesspools?
"By their fruits, you will know them", is something that Jesus said. DEEDS, not "Magic Beliefs"!
So Great Theologian... How about Your DEEDS? Like identity theft? Was it YOU who stole "Buttplug the First"'s ID, to post child porn under his ID? How can we know either way, for SURE (how can we believe any denials that You might make), when you steal IDs, and implicitly in doing so, deliberately LIE, for malicious purposes? Stealing another person's ID is something that I would NEVER do!
So tell me again about Your Superior Theology?
Those are direct quotes from the bible Shillsy, not my "self-righteous preachings". How pig-ignorant do you have to be to think that I wrote them.
This reminds me of when I quoted Section 230 after you had preached on it for months and you didn't even recognize it.
That takes a special kind of stupid. How many hits to the head did you take to get this way?
I've always wondered if it hurt every time his mother dropped him on his head as a child, or just the first few?
Twat GREAT shit-nit-twit-wit!!! Did yer Mamma help you to write that? Or was it GrokPot, the latest AI?
Speaking of "direct quotes from the bible", THIS is twat the Reverend Revenge-Wrath, AKA Mammary-Necrophilia-Farter-Fuhrer-PUNISHER-Twit-Twat, thinks that we should take away from that them thar "Holy" Bible!
God COMMANDS us to kill EVERYONE!
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!! Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE (Romans 3:10). Therefore, ALL must have done at least one thing bad, since they’d be righteous, had they never done anything bad. Well, maybe they haven’t actually DONE evil, maybe they THOUGHT something bad (Matt. 5:28, thoughts can be sins). In any case, they must’ve broken SOME commandment, in thinking or acting, or else they'd be righteous. James 2:10 tells us that if we've broken ANY commandment, we broke them ALL. Now we can’t weasel out of this by saying that the New Testament has replaced the Old Testament, because Christ said that he’s come to fulfill the old law, not to destroy it (Matt. 5:17). So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything. And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses! There’s working on Sunday. There’s also making sacrifices to, or worshipping, the wrong God (Exodus 22:20, Deut. 17:2-5), or even showing contempt for the Lord’s priests or judges (Deut. 17:12). All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses. OK, so now we’re finally there... God’s Word COMMANDS us such that we’ve got to kill EVERYBODY!!!
(I am still looking for that special exception clause for me & my friends & family… I am sure that I will find it soon!)
None of what you quoted tells anyone to kill anyone. Just like with Section 230 you obviously haven't actually read any of the verses you cite.
"ow we can’t weasel out of this by saying that the New Testament has replaced the Old Testament, because Christ said that he’s come to fulfill the old law, not to destroy it"
That's what the crucifixion was about, meathead. Christ fulfilled the law by dying in humanity's place. It only says it in every book and chapter of the New Testament, the Apostles Creed and every doctrinal statement from the Syrian Orthodox to snake-handling Baptists.
If you're going to try to pull some cheap sophistry, maybe don't do it with the foundational belief of every church on the planet.
Go find an online bible and actually read what those verses say before being so stupid.
Then go here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 and actually read Section 230, and stop lying about both.
Oh, HELLO?!? What planet do YOU live on?
Capital offenses in the "Holy" Bible. BTW, "Capital offenses" means that the GOOD God-fearing folks are COMMANDED to KILL You, Perfectly Ignorant Slut!
Attacking one’s parents to cause them bodily harm: Exodus 21:15.
Cursing one’s parents: Exodus 21:17; Leviticus 20:9.
Sacrificing your child to Moloch, a pagan god: Leviticus 20:2.
Willful negligence that results in death
Sorcery: Exodus 22:18; Leviticus 20:27.
Being a medium or spiritist: Leviticus 20:27.
Breaking the Sabbath: Exodus 31:14.
Sacrificing to idol gods: Exodus 22:20; Deuteronomy 13.
Trespassing in God’s holy things and places: Exodus 19:12,13; Numbers 1:51; 3:10,38; 18:7.
Blaspheming against God: Leviticus 24:10-16, esp. v. 16.
False Prophecy: Deuteronomy 18:20.
Contempt for the final decisions of the high court of the land: Deuteronomy 17:8-12.
Giving false testimony in a capital case
Sexual sins that were also capital crimes [2]
Adultery: Leviticus 20:10,11; Deuteronomy 22:22.
Incest (specifically with a daughter in law. For more, see Lev. 18:9-17): Lev. 20:12.
Marriage to both a mother and her daughter: Leviticus 20:14.
Rape of a betrothed or marred woman: Deuteronomy 22:23-29.
Homosexuality: Leviticus 20:13.
Bestiality: Leviticus 20:15,16.
Prostitution, if a priest’s daughter: Leviticus 21:9.
Pretending to be a virgin if you are not: Deuteronomy 22:13-21, esp. v. 21.
If your parents spent 16 years trying to force the communist manifesto into your head and you discovered the free market existed and you didn't have to spout the dialectic how would you feel toward your parents?
Deck the halls with boaf sidez jolly,
Fa la la-la la, la la la la.
Tis the Reason liberteen folly,
Fa la la-la la, la la la la.
Pen we now, don blue apparel,
Fa la la, la la la, la la la.
Trolls are prescient, foresee peril,
Fa la la, la la la, la la la.
https://twitter.com/FrankDeScushin/status/1728421697877869043?t=w3_8YKhIy1zu8gBghJuSaA&s=19
On November 25, 1992, Czechoslovakia's Federal Assembly voted to split the country. The separation took effect in '93. If Czechs & Slovaks felt disconnected and it was a burden to keep them together then what's Europe's future with more disparate groups now within many countries?
Those two had a czechered past and felt is was best to go their separate ways.
https://twitter.com/TheRabbitHole84/status/1728439983927943234?t=7K14vIpuzDmA4hzPJpVZ3w&s=19
Who would you rather have as a neighbor?
[Poll: Derek Chauvin or George Floyd]
Neither.
Particularly because one is buried in the ground and the other is in prison and I don't fancy going to either of those places.
I dunno. I wouldn't object to living next to the graveyard. It'd be quiet, at least.
What’s so bad about a graveyard?
Everyone is dying to get in there.
But you would be a white person and if an "indigenous" person was buried there then you would be on the grounds of a haunted burial ground
I didn't say I wanted to live in the graveyard.
I did eventually get over being Goth. 😉
Neither isn't an option, it's just a way to avoid the unpleasant hypothetical
Would you rather be shot or stabbed?
That's more about where you get shot or stabbed and how big the bullet or blade is, but probably shot.
Chauvin vs Floyd as neighbor is a much less variable situation, and it's fucking hilarious that yall can't sack up and just admit the obvious answer.
"Oh, I dunno if I'd rather have an average cop or a violent crackhead as my neighbor, derp!"
Lol
Neither
How far away is the hypothetical neighbor?
Working under the assumption that the intent of the question implies a state which is both pre-death of the one and pre-imprisonment of the other, I'd rather live next to Chauvin. Obviously.
In an ideal world, I'd rather live next to neither.
At this point in time, well, I'd rather be next to a cemetery than a prison.
I just assumed that the neighbor in a cemetery would be the next grave over.
This is amusing to me because down at the other end of the block I'm on, there actually are houses that back up to a cemetery.
That must have been quite the undertaking.
I can dig it.
Assumes I want to live in the ghetto. Hard pass.
Scott Adams and Robin DiAngelo have it right. It would be better if Blacks and whites just stayed away from each other as much as is practical.
a better formulation of that question is probably:
'who do you think would make a better neighbor?'
https://twitter.com/ModernityNews/status/1728023433286471761
An eco-mentalist screams to be governed harder and vomits green goo everywhere while EU globalists in Brussels blather on about Hydrogen Week or something.
Hydrogen is an important element. Reason commentariat emeritus expert White Mike tells us that each water molecule contains one hydrogen atom.
Perhaps he can explain the chemical makeup pf green vomit and it's role in saving the planet from climate catastrophe.
And two oxygen atoms!
Um excuse me hydrogen makes up 99% of existing elements. And being in the majority is bad. Down with the 99%
Triple digit atomic weights unite!
Just a reminder where THE SCIENCE has taken us.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/11/first_they_came_for_the_smokers.html
“When fascism comes to America,” he said, “it will arrive with a white coat and a stethoscope.”
Nancy Pelosi's daughter explains the J6 hoax to an insurrectionist.
https://twitter.com/CitizenLenz/status/1681387857276174336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1681387857276174336%7Ctwgr%5E90c361c16f7b3c52228122dd7e377566e0d58ebe%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpjmedia.com%2Fbenbartee%2F2023%2F11%2F25%2Fwatch-nancy-pelosis-daughter-caught-on-camera-admitting-january-6-was-a-hoax-n4924213
Alexandra Pelosi admits that the J6 hysteria is purely political and that a fair trial in the DC judicial swamp is nonexistent.
Pelosi then openly admits that the insurrection narrative is baseless, and that the Proud Boys and Gavin McInnes are being labeled as "White Supremacists" for political purposes.
“After the Democrats lose the house, then they get rid of the committee, people may lose I think interest… no one is going to care after the democrats are out of power. And you take Biden out of office- then who cares!?”
“DC is a lot of people who work for the government. I don’t think they’re sympathetic. If you got it moved you’d totally get off.”
“You’re going to be able to laugh about this one day."
“You’re going to be able to laugh about this one day.”
I’m sure the guys in jail find it hysterical.
Sarc sure finds it hilarious.
The mauss that roared.
Where he keeps his drugs is known as the mauss stash.
*cringe*
https://twitter.com/VICE/status/1728258611460083768?t=3kC1ZWdnt8H59vMl_xWEPQ&s=19
100 Ways White People Can Make Life Less Frustrating For People of Color
[Link to article]
Literally, the very first one is the cringiest.
Also: Kesiena Boom is a black lesbian feminist writer and sociologist.
No... no, I'm certain that one works in the white house press room.
Because all black people need the same things.
To be fair they aren't black if they vote against Biden.
That article was even more retarded than I thought it was going to be.
Strong work, Vice.
What a steaming pile of crap. Made it about halfway through.
100 Ways White People Can Make Life Less Frustrating For People of Color
But then...
2. Don’t assume that all people of color share the same views. We are not a monolith.
9. Regard us as autonomous, unique individuals, not as representatives of our race.
Does the article refer to whites as “you people”?
Kill them, then the pocs never have to deal with a white person again
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
Why? Did your stoner randomly ramble incoherently at times?
That might have gotten him a job offer.
Well our current commander in chief exhibits those traits and there's an election coming up. Maus/Vermin Supreme 2024!
But on a more serious subject, it was her turn.
Hillary Clinton Among Top Picks To Run in 2024 If Joe Biden Doesn't: Poll
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hillary-clinton-among-top-picks-run-2024-if-joe-biden-doesnt-poll
Michelle/Oprah '24!
The headline Joe Biden Runs refers to scientists at Depends needing to develop a more moisture absorbent product.
Trump should have put her in jail when he had the chance. Real opportunity to earn votes there that he whiffed bigtime.
Clown/Show 2024.
"When he had the chance"? The entire federal law enforcement establishment was against him. When did he have a chance?
When he was the President of the United States of America, and he could have gone on television at any time with all eyes watching and say, "We are going to investigate and prosecute Hillary Clinton to the fullest extent of the law."
And then nothing would happen.
Who is "we"? He would have been alone in that.
Perhaps, but still a far cry better than, "She's had enough."
https://twitter.com/VDAREJamesK/status/1728555033858334854?t=Dwk4pU17WvwsWTRUIGuxJw&s=19
Always worth reminding everyone that it's BECAUSE these migrants won't work (and probably can't because they're not smart enough) that they are being imported. Their "jobs" are to vote, grow government and NGOs, facilitate income transfers, and hurt Regime enemy classes.
[Link]
Idiot. The current wave of migrants can't work legally because US immigration law won't let them. Most want to work and are quite able to. And your "not smart enough" comment is pure racism, which is typical of you.
False as usual. Less than 2% of those eligible to work have applied for work permits. They can apply as asylum seekers after a set period. They chose not to. This was widely reported 2 weeks ago.
https://nypost.com/2023/11/10/metro/2-of-the-140k-migrants-who-came-to-nyc-have-applied-for-work-permits/
Hochul combed NYC and was only able to find around 14k jobs. Yet most of them chose not to get a permit and work.
Oh look, it’s Jesse with the same bullshit article with the same bullshit statistics.
From his own article:
Still, it’s just about a 2% fraction of the 139,500 asylum seekers who have come through the city’s intake system since spring 2022 — though that number also accounts for migrants who aren’t eligible to work, including children.
How dare those lazy kids not yet apply for work permits!
Also:
Others may have applied for approval to earn a paycheck in the US through non-profits or on their own, but that data wasn’t immediately known.
Oh, so that 2% only represents the number who have applied for work permits through the city. It does not include everyone who has applied for work permits via nonprofits. How many are those? We have no idea!
Plus it also includes all the asylum seekers who are unable to work because they are disabled, or the ones who did not apply because they are relying on a spouse or relative who is seeking work.
The article is pure garbage and its only purpose is to lie with numbers, to gin up outrage and to push a narrative of “lazy migrants”.
Here's Creamjeff to pretend that he didn't try to pull this same phony argument last time Jesse posted this article, only to have his ass handed to him for pretending that kids, newbies and mysterious non-profits accounted for the missing 98%.
It's always Groundhog Day with Jeffy. Every discussion starts from scratch, completely disregarding anything he's been told before.
Oh look, it's the coward, who was shown to have lied and defamed me, and is too much of a pussy to admit that he lied.
Typical jeff sophistry even after he is shown to be wrong. He just presses a reset button like Hillary and hopes nobody notices.
The point of my prior objection, and this objection as well, is that we have no idea what the other 98% are, because the "journalists" who wrote this article did zero work trying to figure it out.
Because the "journalists" who wrote this article don't WANT to inform you, they wanted to push a narrative of "lazy migrants". So they used a misleading statistic to do it.
Of course you fall for it, because you are not interested in being honestly informed, you are interested in repeating narratives that your right-wing masters feed you. Because you and Jesse are the actual fifty-centers around here.
The only reason you all complain about CNN or MSNBC or NY Times being biased, is because it is biased in a direction you don't like. You are totally fine with biased journalism, as long as it is a bias that you approve of.
We can't even get marijuana off the Schedule I list. Republicans want to weaponize it as part of their culture wars, and Democrats are too terrified of being portrayed as supporting potheads. The drug war will continue until we stop demonizing drug use.
Hey buddy. Which laws did your current candidate promote regarding drugs?
"Republicans want to weaponize it as part of their culture wars"
Here's campaign B-roll of Mitch McConnell frolicking in a field of weed, and just last week we had a Reason interview with Rick Perry who was advocating for psychedelics.
Meanwhile the Democratic Party is led by an unrepentant drug warrior who sponsored most of the "Tough on Drugs" bills to pass though congress.
Here's Joe telling congress that he's created a law to permanently incarcerate people for having a quarter-sized amount of crack.
I know that you guys know this stuff, so why are you lying about it?
I'd assume leftard self-projection. As-if the "Republican culture wars" (lol.. wtf?) didn't give that away.
Right-wing MAGA politics caused Conservatives to turn backs on Ukraine, Trudeau claims
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-says-tories-turn-back-on-ukraine-1.7039122
Nothing more MAGA than Canadian parliamentarians.
I think you should be able to ingest whatever substances you wish... as long as I don't have to pay for the consequences.
Unfortunately, under current law, I am forced to pay for the consequences: joblessness, disability, healthcare.
Theft, vandalism, assault.
Twat, theft, vandalism, and EGGregious assault upon the womb-slaves? In The Sacred Name of the Sacred Rights of the Fartilized Egg Smells?
Funny, we're on the same page.
If by "ingest any substances" you also include the rainbow homo/pedo garbage.
Billions - B - of parents don't want to have to pay for the consequences of homosexuality's toxic effect on the world channeled through pop culture, the media, and academia. You going to join in rebelling against it? You going to be on the front lines to come out of the closet and declare that the LGBTP and its supporters/enablers need to be stopped?
A parent pays more than anyone else when their children are introduced, against that parent's will, to toxic lifestyles. Do you want to help those parents/children - or do you want to be a participant in their corruption/destruction?
If some degenerate, disgusting pervert wants to bugger or be buggered by someone - fine. Not my business. But you WILL agree that the rest of society shouldn't have to have that kind of thing normalized and celebrated, correct?
Problem is, who decides what a "toxic lifestyle" is, to the extent that it "needs to be stopped"?
Is Islam a "toxic lifestyle"? How about Christianity? Certain sects of Christianity? How about pornography? How about drinking? How about excessive drinking? (What constitutes 'excessive'?) How about online video gaming? How about social media? How about watching football? How about hunting? How about hunting exotic and rare animals? (Who decides what is 'exotic'?)
Yes. No. Yes. Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. No. No.
Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Select Start
Hahahahaha, you win the internet for the day my punny friend.
Well, that is your opinion. Others disagree.
Why should we go with your opinion on what constitutes a "toxic lifestyle" that "needs to be stopped"?
Furthermore, what precisely do you mean by "needs to be stopped"? Using government force?
"...what precisely do you mean by “needs to be stopped”?"
Anything that disagrees with MY TRIBE needs to be stopped! ESPECIALLY if it makes MEEEE look bad!!!
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been feared and resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
No, it's not my opinion. These are simple facts.
As to your question of what needs to be stopped - read the original post. There is a very, very serious problem in pop culture, academia, and the media. Absent social/market pressure to course correct, they'll continue to be participants in forcing wholly avoidable consequences on those that do not want to pay for them.
No, it’s not my opinion. These are simple facts.
Wait, it is a "simple fact" that Islam is a "toxic lifestyle"? I think about 1.8 billion Muslims would disagree with you.
There is a very, very serious problem in pop culture, academia, and the media. Absent social/market pressure to course correct, they’ll continue to be participants in forcing wholly avoidable consequences on those that do not want to pay for them.
Why don't you be specific on the "toxic" part of the toxic culture that you think the LGBTQ crowd represents to you?
I think about 1.8 billion Muslims would disagree with you.
They're wrong.
Why don’t you be specific on the “toxic” part of the toxic culture that you think the LGBTQ crowd represents to you?
Has nothing to do with me. The point was about everyone else having to pay for the consequences of those who peddle/consume toxic things. If you agree with NOYB2, then you must agree that others shouldn't bear the price of their toxic influence on culture.
I mean, really - there's no upside to any of it. Why would you want that thrust on children, especially against the will of their parents?
By what authority can you claim that Islam is "toxic" but Christianity is not?
And what specifically is toxic about being gay?
Whose authority are you looking for? Certainly not mine, correct? I mean, no way you'd take that at face value, am I right?
Why are you even asking for authority? Why not just evaluate the subject(s) on your own? Do... you need some help with that? Because I'm offering my help.
No of course I would not just take your word at face value, and I'm not going to stay up all night arguing this with you, so I will just state my case and let you have the last word (for tonight anyway).
Clearly it is not a "fact" that Islam is a "toxic lifestyle". That is an opinion. You are entitled to your opinion, but it's not a fact. Plenty of people would claim that Christianity is a "toxic lifestyle", and they might even claim that that is also a "fact". They too would be wrong in claiming it's a "fact", but they are also entitled to their opinions.
If you don't want your family to be exposed to messages that you don't like, then don't expose them to messages that you don't like. It is even easier now than it was in the past, due to the fragmentation of the media landscape. No more are there just three broadcast networks and one or two newspapers per town. You are now able to control what you and your family watch on TV and read on the Internet and listen to on streaming services to a high degree of precision. So do that.
But if that is not good enough, because you want your family to hear a message that *contradicts* the message that everyone else is getting - perhaps the message that everyone else is getting is one of tolerance towards LGBTQ people, but the message that you want your family to hear is one of loathing and disgust towards LGBTQ people - then yeah, that might cause a problem for you when your family causes a scene when they see two gay guys kissing in public. In this case, perhaps what you want is for everyone else to judge you according to your standards - homosexuality is immoral, etc. - instead of you being judged by their standards - you're a bunch of intolerant dickheads. And if you want everyone else to judge the gays as being immoral, instead of judging you for being intolerant, then it's your job to persuade them somehow that gays are immoral. But so far, nothing that the right-wing culture warriors have done has worked - they tried the Leviticus thing, they tried the 'but it will ruin marriage' thing, they tried the 'public indecency' thing, and now they are trying the 'but think of the children!' thing. That seems to be what you are trying now. It is just a cynical ploy to try to put gays back in the closet when all of the other tactics have failed, and I think a lot of people see through the insincere attempt to use kids to push the anti-gay agenda.
Of course the last resort is to use government force to criminalize homosexuality. Is that what you want? You seem rather coy on this point. I hope that is not what you want. But I do think there are some on the right-wing tribe who do want that.
Clearly it is not a “fact” that Islam is a “toxic lifestyle”. That is an opinion.
Nope.
Plenty of people would claim that Christianity is a “toxic lifestyle”, and they might even claim that that is also a “fact”.
They would do so incorrectly.
what you want is for everyone else to judge you according to your standards – homosexuality is immoral, etc. – instead of you being judged by their standards – you’re a bunch of intolerant dickheads.
Which of us is right?
Only if it were coming from a position of dogma.
Which this is not. This is 100% factual and illustrated repeatedly over the course of centuries.
"...they’ll continue to be participants in forcing wholly avoidable consequences on those that do not want to pay for them."
Such ass Trumpanzees who would FORCE one-party rule, mobocracy instead of democracy, upon us all? Can ye name me ONE current or historical example of a one-party state that led to long-term peace and prosperity? I am WAITING with bated breath!
Der TrumpfenFuhrer ***IS*** responsible for agitating for democracy to be replaced by mobocracy!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/trump-election-warnings-leaving-office/index.html
A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses.
Essential heart and core of the LIE by Trump: “ANY election results not confirming MEEE as Your Emperor, MUST be fraudulent!”
September 13 rally: “The Democrats are trying to rig this election because that’s the only way they’re going to win,” he said.
Trump’s constant re-telling and supporting the Big Lie (any election not electing Trump is “stolen”) set up the environment for this (insurrection riot) to happen. He shares the blame. Boys will be boys? Insurrectionists will be insurrectionists, trumpanzees gone apeshit will be trumpanzees gone apeshit, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Trump was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
It really should immediately make us think of Krystallnacht. Hitler and the NAZIs set up for this by constantly blaming Jews for all things bad. Jew-haters will be Jew-haters, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Hitler was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
Oh I see, below you just conflated homosexuality with pedophilia, so that begins to explain why you think LGBTQ people represent a "toxic lifestyle". Let me guess, the gays are all groomers, right?
Oh I see, below you just conflated homosexuality with pedophilia
I didn't do that. They did that. Rainbow. They're even including weird pastels now.
I mean, yea - if we're being honest, we all always knew where it was going. But don't lay that on me. I'm not "conflating" anything. It always was what it always was.
Why should we go with your opinion on what constitutes a “toxic lifestyle” that “needs to be stopped”?
We shouldn't go with anybody's opinion, we should adopt free markets, in which case price mechanisms will communicate what is toxic and what needs to be stopped.
What would be a fair price to have you murdered? Or to have you and yours sold into slavery? That’ll communicate what’s toxic and what needs to be stopped, right?
In a libertarian society, price mechanisms communicate to people what the cost of their actions are. That is true for people who choose to murder others just like for people who choose to take drugs.
What are you trying to get at?
You didn't answer the question. It was actually a pretty impressive sidestep - genuinely, I almost fell for it - but it is, in fact, a sidestep.
>
I can’t read the post that this responds to, but I have to say this reminds me of my last relationship.
And, just for clarity, what she meant every single time was “Maybe.”
Easy. Toxic is a liability to others versus being an asset.
If by “ingest any substances” you also include the rainbow homo/pedo garbage.
I agree: government should not be promoting “homo/pedo garbage”.
You going to be on the front lines to come out of the closet and declare that the LGBTP and its supporters/enablers need to be stopped?
I denounce the “LGBT+ movement” every time I get a chance to. They are evil and destructive to society.
A parent pays more than anyone else when their children are introduced, against that parent’s will, to toxic lifestyles.
Indeed, and it is reprehensible that parents keep using government and tax payers to expose their children to such toxic lifestyles through our school system.
Therefore, public financing of education must stop. Furthermore, we must hold parents accountable, both for giving their children access to toxic content and for the consequences of their children’s actions. It is unacceptable that parents currently can raise sociopaths and have others pay for the harm their children cause.
But you WILL agree that the rest of society shouldn’t have to have that kind of thing normalized and celebrated, correct?
I agree: we should use ostracism to cause toxic little sexual perverts to STUF, including toxic little sexual perverts like you, AT.
Oh come now, "I know you are but what am I?"
That's really the only thing you've got left?
NOYB2, but under any type of regime, you will have to pay for negative externalities of any choice that anyone makes. Even if we lived in your version of Libertopia, you would have to pay higher insurance rates because some druggie in your town committed some crime.
So it seems to me the problem really isn't that you and I will have to pay for negative externalities. The problem is how to minimize the costs of those. Privatizing lots of things is a good start. But there isn't a way to totally eliminate all of the negative externalities.
Furthermore, what is the goal here - is it to increase liberty? Or is it to reduce costs? If the goal is to increase liberty, then we should be willing to tolerate some reasonable increase in costs to further that goal. But if the goal is to reduce costs, then sure, keep the status quo until the costs come down, I suppose?
you will have to pay for negative externalities of any choice that anyone makes.
Which is why we, as individuals and as a society, discourage negative choices. Such as drug use, homosexuality/pedophilia, pornography, abortion, and the like. If every liberty came with only personal costs, then these wouldn't be a problem. But we know they're not when they leave their privacy and start spreading beyond their own walls. When we're united against these social blights, and actively fight against them, it DOES make a difference and in doing so it discourages the practices and minimizes the costs that we all have to pay to deal with them.
Yes, ALL of the Evil-Doers who are LESS than us self-righteous folks need to be PUNISHED-PUNISHED-PUNISHED!!!
Punish-punish-punish! Personally, I think that punishment should be strictly reserved for only those who cannot otherwise be corrected, and then, “the punishment should fit the crime”. What is needed, and then no more, as far as the severity of the punishment goes. Even criticism is punishment, and it, too, should be carefully rationed.
What have very varied thinkers through the years said about this?
"Beware of all those in whom the urge to punish is strong." - Friedrich Nietzsche
“Mistrust all those in whom the desire to punish is imperative.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"Let he who is without sin, throw the first stone." - Jesus
“How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ while there is still a beam in your own eye? You hypocrite! First take the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” - Jesus
Nobody's talking about punishment. The goal is better people making better choices that lead to better lives.
"Which is why we, as individuals and as a society, discourage negative choices."
So you said... Are ye gonna use PERSUASION, or ya gonna use FORCE? Force, backed up by votes, is STILL force! Force is NOT sanitized by votes! Else the 51% can vote-chose to kill the ones who... Fill in the blank... Get tattoos... Crack their knuckles... Or scratch their butts during the National Anthem!
If you say "persuasion", and persuasion alone, than I have no fight with you... Clarity is a VERY good thing, here, though! State yer position clearly, please!
You have no fight with me.
Which is why we, as individuals and as a society, discourage negative choices. Such as drug use, homosexuality/pedophilia, pornography, abortion, and the like.
These are not always "negative choices", and maybe "society" is not a monolith that shouldn't be uniformly discouraging or encouraging many things at all.
Oh, and homosexuality and pedophilia are not the same thing.
Yea, they are.
Feel free to apply that across the board with your reply.
What, you think homosexuals are pedophiles?
Of course not.
Just like LGBTP "allies" aren't necessarily homosexuals.
Just enablers.
So homosexuals enable pedophilia? All of them? How exactly?
Well, for one, they don't denounce deviant lifestyles. And in doing so, they encourage other deviant lifestyles. Which then gain traction, Which then can't be denounced, because it would diminish their own position.
Which is why you don't often find gays fighting pedos. They'd have to burn their own rainbow flag to do it.
Are you Christian? How many times have you denounced other Christians who have sinned? Every single time?
Maybe individuals are responsible for their own problems, instead of trying to apply collective guilt to entire groups of people.
Thou shall not covet thy neighbor’s wife’s son from her first marriage.
It's not my job to denounce them. It's their job to denounce themselves, and mine to be there for them when they seek a better way.
No, I didn't.
mine to be there for them when they seek a better way.
Sadly, you don't know a better way, AT. You certainly understand nothing about Christianity or morality.
I certainly know better than you - you who openly brags on a regular basis about how you’ve consciously, eagerly, and unapologetically rejected both.
NOYB2, but under any type of regime, you will have to pay for negative externalities of any choice that anyone makes.
If you choose to take drugs, lose your job, and die in the gutter, that's not an "externality". It doesn't affect me.
Even if we lived in your version of Libertopia, you would have to pay higher insurance rates because some druggie in your town committed some crime.
Free markets provide insurance and security cheaper and more efficiently than government, so my insurance rates would go down.
If you choose to take drugs, lose your job, and die in the gutter, that’s not an “externality”. It doesn’t affect me.
Well, someone has to pick up the body out of the gutter.
Well, someone has to pick up the body out of the gutter.
It won't be my gutter, and even if it were, that doesn't cost anything.
It won’t be my gutter, and even if it were, that doesn’t cost anything.
So in your version of libertopia, there are slaves cleaning the gutters of dead bodies? How does this work exactly?
You haven't owned property ever, have you? Property maintenance, clearing, and security is something property owners have to pay for anyway.
Hey, marijuana makes my life better, and effectively helps me manually manage my blood pressure (pot being a vasodialator) for which my autonomous nervous system doesn't regulate it, thanks to radiation treatment for cancer which, like in the anti-drug commercial of eggs frying, really fried my brain stem and carotid nerves.
"To have a DMT experience, it seems like you're talking with entities or in some other world. Or is this the afterlife? Or is this some other dimension? That is the subjective feeling of a lot of experiences."
Being a believer in the Ancient Alien theory, I suggest Mauss should question whether his experience is actually valid and his rejection of that theory is wrong. Many people have claimed to have received messages from Gods/aliens, such as renowned mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan who claims his insights came from an Indian god.
Hey, marijuana makes my life better,
Well, if there are benefits to drug use, a free market healthcare system will reward you for taking them. Either way, the costs/benefits of drug use should be accounted for by market mechanisms, not by forcible redistribution.
Poor Mike Lindell. Not even Republicans are buying his schtick anymore.
https://www.newsweek.com/mike-lindell-rages-republican-officials-blocking-his-efforts-1846537
Funny because his schtick (IP address logs) hasn't been de-bunked what-so-ever. Under reasonable conditions the rock-solid log printouts would have to be countered with real ones before running around calling them "conspiracy theories". But the last election was except from any reasonable checks (investigation) what-so-ever and instead has turned into witch-hunting the rock-solid evidence.
Do you ever stop for one second to realize that Hillary got years of investigation about F'En facebook advertisements while foreign IP addresses connecting with ballot machines, over-night ballot counting, videos of drop-box stuffing, executive order violations of election law, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc are all swept under the rug?
No of course you don't. Because you are nothing but a partisan hack as most leftards are. No Principles - It's all about [WE] gang-affiliated RULES!
Oh hey, guess what. The Florida Don't Say Gay law is now coming to the workplace.
https://www.pnj.com/story/news/2023/11/22/floridas-dont-say-gay-law-could-be-coming-to-workplaces-next/71679139007/
Here's the most pernicious part about it:
This proposed law would make it illegal to "require employees to undergo training regarding sexual and gender identity and expression", not just for government employees, not just for contractors with government contractors, but for ALL nonprofits in the state.
I don't see how that could possibly be legal, but hey, it's DeSantis in an election season, so he's gonna try to do something.
The Florida Don’t Say Gay law
That's not a thing. Turn off CNN.
Funny how the crowd that is very sloppy in its usage of terms like "leftist" and "socialism" tends to be very strict in its demands on how others describe its priorities.
Yep, a laugh a minute. But there's still no such thing as a "Don't say gay" law - so, correct yourself.
Why don't you try to comment on why you think it would be legal for the state of Florida, or any state, to make it illegal for a nonprofit to forbid training on gender identity.
Don't care.
Retract your statement. It is false. There is no "don't say gay" law in Florida. Period. Admit it and own it.
I used the term as it was used in the article that I cited. Deal with it. Not everyone gets to use the words that you prefer. Some people call Trump and DeSantis mean words, and you don't get to run around and demand that they all retract their meanness.
If you don't care, why are you getting so bitchy about me using the term as it is commonly used, and as it was used in the article that was cited?
I used the term as it was used in the article that I cited. Deal with it.
No. Be smarter. And stop rationalizing your idiocy.
Stop being such a snowflake. For being a guy who claims not to care, you sure seem to care a lot.
What is it about you that keep you from admitting that you were wrong? Is it pride? Arrogance? Insolence?
There IS NO "don't say gay" law. Why can't you just acknowledge that?
Why are you so insistent on policing my language, for a guy who claims that he doesn't care?
I used the term as it was presented in the article that I cited. Lots of people refer to the law as the Don't Say Gay law.
Are you the guy who, when someone hands you a tissue, and they call it a Kleenex, you correct the person, saying "no, it's a tissue, a Kleenex is a brand name, and you handed me a generic brand, that makes it a tissue"?
Lots of people are wrong. Why are you insistent about being one of them?
Correcting you isn't "policing your language" - it's helping you not say stupid and false things.
Retract it. Have just the slightest amount of integrity. There's no shame in it.
It makes you really really upset that I referred to it as the Don't Say Gay law because that is what was in the article, doesn't it?
Does it make you really really upset because that is what the law's opponents refer to it as?
Does it make you really really upset because you really really support the law and you really really don't want to be labeled as anti-gay for supporting it?
Not upset, just genuinely curious why you're so committed to being wrong.
He’s really really committed.
Difference is that the term "death tax" doesn't materially misrepresent what's actually being discussed. They are taxes that go into effect over your property and your freedom to transfer it posthumously.
That is not the case with PREA. The term "don't say gay" (intentionally) implies that it has something specifically to do with homosexuals/homosexuality. It does not.
It should be called The Anti Indoctrination Law
https://reason.com/2022/09/27/for-florida-gov-ron-desantis-political-stunts-are-more-important-than-substance/ and
https://reason.com/2022/09/21/are-ron-desantis-migrant-flights-legal/
Ass POTUS, DeSatan will be forcing USA taxpayers to trick and ferry billions upon brazilians of sub-Brazilians from Brazil to Botswana, and to deport illegal sub-Martians from Mars to Uranus! Ass long ass the illegal Martians SUFFER-SUFFER-SUFFER, red-meat-hungry socons and troglodytes will be DELIGHTED to spend those extra tax dollars! Butt I for one think that illegal Martians are intelligent beings, too, and hope that they will NOT suffer on Uranus, from too many foul odors, etc.!
DeSatan… SPEAKS to me! Get Thee behind me, DeSatan!
Scienfoology Song… GAWD = Government Almighty’s Wrath Delivers
DeSatan loves me, This I know,
For DeSatan tells me so,
Little ones to GAWD belong,
We are weak, but GAWD is strong!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan loves me, yes indeed,
Makes the illegal sub-humans bleed,
Protects me for geeks and freaks,
I LOVE to pay taxes, till my wallet squeaks!
PUNISH Disney, I’ll PAY for their pains,
Ass long ass DeSatan Blesses our gains!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan expels the low-lifes to Venus,
Moves them ANYWHERE, with His Penis!
His Penis throbs with His Righteousness,
Take no heed, He says, of His Frighteousness!
ALL must be PUNISHED, they say!
So never, EVER be or say gay!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
Our USA taxes must PAY The Way, He may say,
To EXPORT the illegal Mars aliens, every day!
To Pluto, Jupiter, or Uranus, they must ALL go!
Oh, the places that the low-lifes will go, you must know!
The taxes we shall pay? Through the money, we must BLOW!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
(If we did NOT do-doo, doo-doo-doo, ALL of this, then that them thar illegal Mars aliens WILL show up on OUR doors, in the formerly pure USA!!! We MUST keep them AWAY, far away, out in the Deep Dark Yonder!)
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
Kind of a weird dude, aren't you.
I hope that POTUS DeSatan exports ALL of the illegal sub-Martians to YOUR Uranus!!! Uranus, get thee BEHIND me!!!!
You certainly have a unique take on astronomy.
You certainly have a unique take on psychology.
You resent the hell out of the fact that many other people are flat-out, better, more honest people than you are, right? More “live and let live”, and WAAAY less authoritarian?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-love-and-war/201706/why-some-people-resent-do-gooders
From the conclusion to the above…
“These findings suggest that we don’t need to downplay personal triumphs to avoid negative social consequences, as long as we make it clear that we don’t look down on others as a result.”
SQRLSY back here now… So, I do NOT want you to feel BAD about YOU being an authoritarian asshole, and me NOT being one! PLEASE feel GOOD about you being an evil, lying asshole! You do NOT need to push me (or other REAL lovers of personal liberty) down, so that you can feel better about being an asshole! EVERYONE ADORES you for being that asshole that you are, because, well, because you are YOU! FEEL that self-esteem, now!
You resent the hell out of the fact that many other people are flat-out, better, more honest people than you are, right?
Maybe. But are they though? Am I? Or is that just what we all want to tell ourselves?
Be careful with hubris. That's a mule that'll kick you in the teeth more often than it will carry your baggage.
I imagine sometimes squirrel cries himself to sleep telling himself that he is the better of others. If he’a particularly loud, an orderly comes to check on him.
Wait until he really gets going. Cannibalism, Nazis, you name it.
"SQRLSY One 29 mins ago
Flag Comment Mute User
GMO and-or cultured HUMAN meat, with the PRECISELY needed (already-built-in-by genetics) balance of amino acids! Even with NO killing of anything truly living or “human”, how many customers would go for it?
"SQRLSY One
September.30.2020 at 12:53 pm
Yes! This FURTHER proves that Hitler was NOT a racist!
Since even Hitler wasn’t a racist, we can pretty firmly conclude that racism isn’t a “thing” at all!
SQRLSY One
November.9.2020 at 4:26 pm
Bimsday, 39 Bemberbember 2020 at 6:66 PM
I love to LIE my ass off, and suck Satan’s dick! Because I hate humanity! The Evil One is the Father of Lies, just as Der TrumpfenFuhrer is the Stable Genius! So, as the apple falls not far from the tree, I INSIST on telling obvious lies, all day, every day! Butt… Surprise, surprise! Other Evil Ones Junior will fall for my lies… Because they want to!
This proposed law would make it illegal to “require employees to undergo training regarding sexual and gender identity and expression”, not just for government employees, not just for contractors with government contractors, but for ALL nonprofits in the state.
I would like to see all government interference in employment/workplace issues stopped. But as long as the state does interfere, I approve of regulations like this.
i am in general agreement with this sentiment
Businesses are being coerced into wasting money on HR initiatives and DIE ESG crap because of social credit scores and punishments enforced by woke funds[looking at you Blackrock] and govts
This gives them an easy off ramp from that kind of blackmail
As long as there are Church ladies, then there will be prohibition
The problem with trying to defend liberty against the Church Ladies is that they're right—if none of us drank alcohol, took recreational drugs, smoked, or engaged in sexual promiscuity, we all WOULD be healthier and better off. It takes a complex and nuanced argument to show why tolerating the damaging effects of personal freedom is better than prohibiting self-destructive behavior that inevitably causes grief and harm to others as well. Arguments for liberty don't fit on a bumper sticker.
Way cool; Well put!
My nomination for that bumper sticker:
"Learn from History!"
It takes a complex and nuanced argument to show why tolerating the damaging effects of personal freedom is better than prohibiting self-destructive behavior that inevitably causes grief and harm to others as well. Arguments for liberty don’t fit on a bumper sticker.
Personal freedom only works if it is couple with personal responsibility and free markets. That way, market price mechanisms communicate information about the benefits and risks of choices.
Legalizing drugs in the context of socialized and regulated insurance systems is not libertarian and does not represent "personal freedom"; it is an instance of concentrated benefits (in personal freedom for drug users) and diffuse costs (in personal freedom for rate payers).
"The problem with trying to defend liberty against the Church Ladies is that they’re right"
No. They're wrong. They haven't invented a magical wand of willful master/puppet capabilities (a brainless sub-sector humanity).
'guns' (gov-guns) forces aren't going to make a person healthier by shooting then and locking them up (heightening natural consequence).
Not to mention they wildly dismiss any Pro's that come about. Like having humans with brains instead of a few self-righteous dictators who will eventually get so power-mad the witch-hunts really will come back into the equation.
‘guns’ (gov-guns) forces aren’t going to make a person healthier by shooting then and locking them up (heightening natural consequence).
We don’t “shoot drug addicts and lock them up”. Taking drugs by itself is effectively not punished in the US. Drug dealing and drug-related crime are punished, and that does make people healthier.
Of course, the better approach would be to let people face the consequences of drug use through free market mechanisms. But drug "legalization" advocates don't advocate that.
"But drug “legalization” advocates don’t advocate that."
correct.
"We don’t 'shoot drug addicts and lock them up'."
incorrect.
While causing accidents in the process that ends up shooting innocent people or don't you follow current events?
Those who follow the church ladies and treat their bodies like a temple may live longer, but they won't have as much fun.
No one wants to hear stories about going to church and eating kale. They want to hear stories from the guy who took ecstacy and woke up with a midget.
That's why Reason didn't argue against mask-wearing on liberty grounds, they argued it on the grounds that the science was unsettled, but was careful to scold Rand Paul that... c'mon, man, they aren't just like... talismans or something, man.
I wish, but it's not looking too likely. Oregon tried to lead the way and is now wondering if they made a mistake.
The end of the drug war is inevitable because the reboot in civilization is inevitable as the endless cycles show
Robert E. Lee’s entire strategy was to march the confederate troops on Washington to capture the Capitol where somebody could put their boots on the speaker of the house’s desk.
Didn't see anything in Nardz post disrespecting troops or calling for violence. You're the one complaining that southerners weren't executed. WTF are you blathering about?
Do you think the Taliban should have executed all Americans after they defeated the US?
Thank God the people of the time didn't, because forgiveness is impossible with the dead.
The ignorance of the left is astounding. You complain about history of America while acting like every authoritarian regime in history trying to destroy the past, melting statues, etc.
Youre what you complain about.
The real creeps are the ones trying to pretend Robert E Lee is somehow relevant in order to attack whole subsets of working class Americans.
Our troops? Are you that old? You've got a lot of anger toward people who have been dead for over 100 years.
A few do. The ones I have seen have their spouse decide what the use can be where the community elders also weigh in on it. Iirc, Schwartzentruber and Old Order Mennonite not so much.
Them and any others who are preyed upon by groomers and their enablers/supporters/allies.
The US invaded Afghanistan. Remember when Hillary and Biden gave Bush the green light?
Biden did drone strike murder eight kids and an aid worker on the way out so that kinda satiates your desire for summarily executing folks.
Ok Mark Fuhrman.
Wait ml isn't American? What the hell is he a kanuck?
Shrike?
Diet Shrike?
How’s typing strawmen working out for you?
Keep banging away like Pluggo watching a Home Alone marathon.
Oh, I see. It's just another sockpuppet for someone who needed someone to pay attention to them for a while. From the blatant racism, I'm guessing it's PluggedUp. And now it's a grey box, like the rest.
The US invaded Afghanistan.
Do you support them when they commit war crimes?
The Nuremberg defense. Lovely.
So youre just a moron. Lol. The woke are the ones tearing down statues dumbass.
That you sarc?
Aren't you just the lovely fucking ray of sunshine.
How very Pol pot year 0 of you
My guess is that Lynn is that killallmormons dude. Same pointless ranting.
I prefer the term "Maple Siberian" for the Canuckistani peoples.
Though I believe ML recently acquired US citizenship.