Justice Department Finds 'Deeply Disturbing' and Illegal Policing in Minneapolis
Minneapolis police used gratuitous force, discriminated against black and Native American residents, and retaliated against people exercising their First Amendment rights.

Attorney General Merrick Garland announced today that a Justice Department investigation found that the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) engaged in "deeply disturbing" and illegal policing that violated the constitutional rights of residents.
A report by the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division concluded that the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) used unreasonable and excessive force, discriminated against black and Native American residents, and retaliated against reporters and citizens who recorded the police, violating their First Amendment rights.
The investigation was launched in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis in 2020, and Garland said it uncovered the systemic problems that led to Floyd's murder.
"George Floyd's death had an irrevocable impact on his family, on the Minneapolis community, on our country, and on the world," Garland said in a press conference. "The patterns and practices of conduct the Justice Department observed during our investigation are deeply disturbing. They erode the community's trust in law enforcement. And they made what happened to George Floyd possible."
The City of Minneapolis cooperated with the Justice Department, and the report notes that it has already taken several steps to reform its practices. City officials and the Justice Department have reached a tentative agreement to enter into a court-enforced settlement, known as a "consent decree," to fix remaining issues.
Still, the report offers withering criticism of MPD's use-of-force practices, finding that officers unreasonably and gratuitously used bodily force, Tasers, pepper spray, and firearms, including on minors and suspects who were compliant or handcuffed.
In one instance, an MPD officer tased a man who was filming him while a DOJ investigator was riding along in the squad car. The report also notes a 2017 incident where an officer fatally shot a woman who approached his squad car and "spooked" him. The woman had called 911 to report a possible sexual assault in a nearby alley.
The report found MPD also routinely violated the First Amendment rights of people who criticized, protested, or recorded them, including credentialed media.
For example, an MPD officer put a teenager in a neck restraint for yelling "fuck the police" and insisted, incorrectly, that the teen did not have a First Amendment right to say it. In another instance, during the unrest following Floyd's murder, a group of MPD officers encountered several reporters sheltering in a gas station. The officer pushed one journalist to the ground, and when he held up his press credentials, an MPD sergeant pepper sprayed him in the face and walked away.
"For years, MPD used dangerous techniques and weapons against people who committed at most a petty offense and sometimes no offense at all," the report says. "MPD used force to punish people who made officers angry or criticized the police. MPD patrolled neighborhoods differently based on their racial composition and discriminated based on race when searching, handcuffing, or using force against people during stops. The City sent MPD officers to behavioral health-related 911 calls, even when a law enforcement response was not appropriate or necessary, sometimes with tragic results. These actions put MPD officers and the Minneapolis community at risk."
These sorts of reports and consent decrees are one of the most powerful tools the federal government has to push cities to reform rotten police departments, but they also depend on favorable political winds. The Obama administration launched a record number of such "pattern or practice" investigations, which found widespread police misconduct in Chicago, Baltimore, and Ferguson, Missouri. However, the Trump administration, which painted itself as a staunch ally of police, opposed such investigations and dramatically pared them back.
Under the Biden administration, the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division has once again ramped up its investigations into systemic police misconduct. In March, another Justice Department probe identified severe and pervasive constitutional violations by the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD). The report documented stunningly unprofessional behavior by LMPD officers: "Some officers have videotaped themselves throwing drinks at pedestrians from their cars; insulted people with disabilities; and called Black people 'monkeys,' 'animal,' and 'boy.'"
The two-year investigation also found that LMPD officers unreasonably deployed Tasers and police dogs on compliant and nonthreatening suspects and used unjustified neck restraints.
Presidential candidate and Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently said in an interview with RealClearPolitics that one of his priorities if elected would be to reorganize the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Attorney General Merrick Garland announced
When I read that collection of words and syllables, I know everything that follows is going to be solid.
Solid what?
Check your Gen Z dictionary.
No cap, fr fr.
Almost embarrassed I know what that means.
For an hour I sat in a desk in front of a chalkboard while my kids drew charts and gave lessons in zoomerisms. So I’m reasonably versed.
It was fire, ong
I earn approximately $13,000 a month working part-time. I was curious to learn more after hearing from multiple people about the amount of money they were able to make online. Well, it all happened and totally bs-11 changed my life. Everyone must now use this website to try out this job.
.
.
Detail Are Here——————————>>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
So I'm dating a millennial and I like to cook. The language barrier can get a little weird.
Last night I made surf 'n turf tacos on the grill, and she was like 'these are fire'. And my initial reaction was to tell her to use less hot sauce, but what she actually meant was that they were restaurant quality and she was impressed. I'm learning.
Later, she needed to 'dip', which apparently means to go home and take care of her sick dog.
In the good ole days "dip" meant to get a nice wad of Cope in your lip (or Grizzly or Wolf because broke).
That was before the vapes came along and made nicotine all gay and stuff.
Right? I was like 'Let me get you a spit cup'.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.Apprichs.com
Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page............ http://Www.Easywork7.com
An easy and quick way to make money online by working part-time and earning an additional $15,000 or more. by working in my spare time in 1ce85 In my previous month (bgr-03), I made $17250, and this job has made me very happy. You can try this right now by following the instructions here
.
.
.
Check Profile______ Reason777.Com
ACAB
All Criminals Are Black? Not very progressive.
It's pride month.
"Affirming Castration Against Biology."
"All Cows Are Beautiful"
"All Comments [here] Are Brainless"
So far, so true.
The City of Minneapolis cooperated with the Justice Department, and the report notes that it has already taken several steps to reform its practices. City officials and the Justice Department have reached a tentative agreement to enter into a court-enforced settlement, known as a “consent decree,” to fix remaining issues.
Some intrepid reporter out there should do a story about cities that have been under consent decrees, analyze how things have changed.
Maybe Reason could outsource that to someone.
"For example, an MPD officer put a teenager in a neck restraint for yelling "fuck the police" and insisted, incorrectly, that the teen did not have a First Amendment right to say it."
Is this that "freedom of speech, but not freedom from consequences" thing I keep hearing about? I don't think it is, but I just wanted to check.
It's also known as something pulled out of the grab bag of incidents in a city of 425,000 people that get used to justify federalizing our national police force. I like to think of this as "upzoning" Minneapolis.
justify federalizing our national police force
I have no problem with the constitutional rationale here.
Both a 14th Amendment rights of a US citizen basis. And an Art1 militia organizing authority - reserving to the States the appointment of the officers and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress
Those two authorities are much better exercised in an environment of one level of government checking and balancing the other. As it is here. More so than the more widely practiced 'dump all sorts of military equipment on the cops and give them free rein' to use it.
Yeah...if the police can respond (illegally) like that, speech is no longer free, obviously. The adverse consequences should be applied to the police officer, not to the speaker, immature though he may be.
Or you can just applaud when a cop shoots someone you don’t like in the back.
Black cop white victim. I think the kids call that social justice.
This is like Bernie Madoff sccusing a street hustler of fraud.
Threadwinner
The event itself is like Madoff accusing a street hustler of fraud.
The story is like Reason endorsing AG Madoff accusing a street hustler of fraud in the name of racial and social justice.
The story is like Reason endorsing Adolf Hitler because after all he left the means of production in private hands because tariffs don't work.
A street hustler? It's like Bernie Madoff accusing the Mafia of being a violent criminal organization. He'd be correct and, in this case, Merrick Garland is correct. Unfortunately, Garland doesn't seem to be planning any serious next steps.
If the Minneapolis Police Department investigated the Justice Department they would find them engaged in "deeply disturbing" and illegal policing that violated the constitutional rights of citizens especially parents.
I wouldn't have any problem at all with states attempting to prevent the feds from violating the rights of citizens. Course they would have to be protecting the constitutional rights of citizens of that STATE. State have no authority to determine what the federal/US rights are.
An example might be re marijuana. Would have been perfectly legal imo for states to defy federal prohibitions re banking for the last decade for pot businesses. Course, that would mean states would have to have a state bank (either public facing or offering clearing type stuff for banks) and only North Dakota has that.
I have been told that criticizing or even challenging any POC is always and only racism, even when done by another POC. And that all POC encounters with police end with torture and murder. So whatever POC in Minneapolis claim the police did must be true, and must be racist.
My buddy is a security guard at a bank in Minneapolis and passes time at work by listening to a police scanner...he says so far there's been 3 shootings today and his shift didn't start till noon, all black male shooters and black victims which is hard to believe since the media keeps telling us that only white cops shoot people and didn't Biden just say our biggest threat is from white supremacists?
The biggest threat is from Joe Biden and his fellow travelers in the democrat party.
Ironucally, we have seen that this is still preferable to what "criminal justice reform" has done to major cities. This is horrible...but the alternatives that Reason calls for and ignores the ramifications of are worse.
the systemic problems that led to Floyd's murder.
The problems that led to Floyd's death were entirely on the part of Floyd.
MPD patrolled neighborhoods differently based on their racial composition
The type, severity, and amount of crime in a neighborhood ARE different based on their racial composition.
These sorts of reports and consent decrees are one of the most powerful tools the federal government has to push cities to reform rotten police departments
They also have a history of worsening police departments by imposing lower standards to meet racial hiring quotas and reducing policing of high-crime areas.
Pretty sure that Garland’s agenda includes getting rid of white cops, and anyone who isn’t a bootlicking Marxist.
A city near me eliminated all written testing of police recruits a few years ago in a desperate attempt to meet consent decree-imposed hiring quotas. They based hiring solely on verbal interviews because they could not find enough Black applicants who were literate.
Minneapolis police used gratuitous force, discriminated against black and Native American residents, and retaliated against people exercising their First Amendment rights.
Minneapolis used to be a nice place to live.
Maybe this explains why.
I like to think that it is possible for police to do their job and enforce the law effectively without any gratuitous whomping on people (of any race). There's a lot of room between "back the police no matter what" and "stop enforcing laws because too many black people are getting arrested".
If the police "enforce the law effectively" in major cities then there will be far more encounters between police and Black people and far more Black people than others getting arrested. That is unacceptable to the leftist activists, regardless of how the behavior of Black people differs from others.
“These sorts of reports and consent decrees are one of the most powerful tools the federal government has to push cities to reform rotten police departments”
I don’t know where to start! Although it may be technically true that these useless consent decrees are the most powerful tool they’ve got, but it doesn’t mean that it’s even a little bit effective. “Police reform” is a fig leaf that never actually happens except cosmetically. Oh, gosh! Who knew our police were violating the civil rights of our constituents and their own training? Honest, guys … we promise to improve our training and make sure all of our officers toe the line from now on! What a bunch of tripe. The fact that we can’t possibly get elected to our powerful cushy over-compensated tax funded feather beds without corrupt police union permission and that we have no intention of prosecuting police officers who commit murder under color of authority has nothing whatever to do with this deeply disturbing pattern of policing. It’s just inadequate training. Nothing to see here guys … you can go back to D.C. now.
The only things that will change this horrible situation would be when police criminals are consistently prosecuted and found guilty of their crimes; when police unions are banned completely; and when the mission of police departments and sheriffs offices is completely changed to eliminate routine patrols and all victimless crimes and minor infractions.
I was going to say the same thing. These reports and consent decrees are feeble tools that have never accomplished meaningful reforms.
The report documented stunningly unprofessional behavior by LMPD officers: “Some officers have videotaped themselves throwing drinks at pedestrians from their cars; insulted people with disabilities; and called Black people ‘monkeys,’ ‘animal,’ and ‘boy.'”
So all this time , all those minorities complaining of police misconduct were correct ? How much more of a slam dunk case is possible if the police are recording themselves doing it ?
When push comes to shove, a number of posters here will support the police over "those people", regardless of circumstances.
What if one of “those people” commits a home invasion and points a gun at the belly of a pregnant woman?
Why won’t you kill yourself?
You see he had no choice because of white supremacy.
What if …? How about not arresting just any of “those people” because others are committing crimes? When someone points a gun at the belly of a pregnant woman, not risking getting killed by calling the police and “spooking” them with your presence is an option.
That would be a circumstance where the police would be justified in using such force as was reasonably necessary (uplifted knife exception possible).
But I am of course talking about situations when the cops are the wrongdoers and US citizens are having their rights infringed.
I observe that some right-wing frequent posters avoid commenting on any article involving police misconduct.
Somehow, I don't think calling black people, or anybody, "boy" is the slam dunk you think it is. Matter of fact, the relative banality of all the words out of context makes it seem like dropping the ball in a 5' hoop is being passed off as a Jordan-esque slam dunk.
Unless I'm mistaken, at least two of the officers in two of the (other) incidents mentioned weren't racially or vengeance motivated and were dismissed for their unofficial and unacceptable conduct and this seems more like a politically-motivated token gesture rather than any sort of real reform.
“Some officers have videotaped themselves throwing drinks at pedestrians from their cars; insulted people with disabilities; and called Black people ‘monkeys,’ ‘animal,’ and ‘boy.’”
Only one of these things is remotely racially adjacent.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
The report also notes a 2017 incident where an officer fatally shot a woman who approached his squad car and “spooked” him. The woman had called 911 to report a possible sexual assault in a nearby alley.
Unless we’re using a very colloquial definition of the word “spooked”, I fail to see how this is somehow conclusive or exemplary of systematic discrimination, excessive use of force, or retaliation.
Edit: Wait, Holy Shit, is this the Noor/Diamond case? Where the officer was charged with manslaughter?
Sounds like it. He must have been racist against Australians.
And since released. It is ok for black, immigrant cops to shoot unarmed white women.
There's constant need to keep the police in line. The lapel cameras are helping to some degree.
But when I read reports that police are "discriminating against blacks," I need more info.
Specifically, if it's the FREQUENCY of police interaction with blacks, one has to consider the VERY high violent crime rate of young black males. To simplify, if blacks commit, say --50% of the violent crimes -- it's only sensible that the police are more prone to question and investigate blacks.
As it is, with only 13% of the nation's population, currently blacks commit about 58% of all the nation's murders (per capita, 9+ times the murder rate of everyone else). 90+% of blacks murdered are killed by other blacks.
Similar ratios are found for assault, rape and robberies.
No one wants to face these facts. Especially black leaders.
The actual proportion of murders committed by Blacks is probably much higher than the stats show because of the low closing rate of murder cases in violent Black neighborhoods. The race of the perpetrator doesn't go into the statistics unless the case is solved.
Actually I largely adjusted for that very real factor. I took the "unknown" murderers and allocated that group according the KNOWN frequency of murderers by group.
BTW, CURRENT stats are now completely useless, as many woke police departments no longer report the race of the criminal in violent crimes. FBI stats since 2020 have become meaningless, as even the FBI concedes.
DOJ investigates and find the Minneapolis police are guilty of the systematic racism they claim in prevelant everywhere. Well golly aint that a co-wink-a-dink.
On a related note, proud to see George Floyd drug free for three years!
Minneapolis has been run for a while by the Democrat-Farm-Labor Party, plus, currently, a Democratic Socialist, so they’re probably Left of most Progressives. They’re the ones who hire the cops, but that never seems to be mentioned in the media. Wonder why.
Don't forget that Minneapolis is basically New Mecca.
New Mogadishu
> The officer pushed one journalist to the ground, and when he held up his press credentials, an MPD sergeant pepper sprayed him in the face and walked away.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! What an Absolute Chad!
Oh man, stop making me praise cops, Reason.
And before you start to balk, remember: You don't hate journalists enough. You think you do, but you don't.
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1640505559660085248
Seriously, is there video of that? I would LOVE video of that.
Whether you sell clothes, electronics or beauty products, our product description generator can help you create product descriptions that connect with your customers.Looking for content that is both creative and informative for your e-commerce store? Look no further than our product description generator which provides unique descriptions tailored to your products.
Learn more: https://simplified.com/ai-writer/product-description-generator
I appreciate the insightful content you shared about logo design, web design, and typography. The importance of well-crafted typefaces cannot be overstated when it comes to creating visually appealing designs. Whether it’s a striking logo or an eye-catching banner, the right choice of fonts and design elements can make all the difference. Your tips provide valuable guidance for anyone looking to enhance their design skills and make a lasting impact. Thank you for sharing this valuable information!Gacha Nox Apk
Cash generating easy and fast method to work part time and earn an extra $15,000 or even more than this online. By working in my spare time I made $17990 in my previous month and I am very happy now because of this job. you can try this now by following
the details here...... https://Www.Worksprofit.com
and then what happened?
I suppose it is racism when is Somali cop in a marked car shoots the white woman who reported a possible crime when she approaches the car to speak with the officers.
Who could’ve dreamed that bringing in thousands of third world people would make your city and its police of Third World quality
I have no doubts Minneapolis has problems with their force. Many, if not most, cops are not to be trusted but I am skeptical that Merrick Garland can run an objective in investigation.
The Affirmative Action Somali cop-murderer somehow gets transformed into a reason for more affirmative action.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Justine_Damond
And this C.J. Ciaramella person appears to be utterly clueless about mutual-backscratching Woke consent decrees.
Clueless or approving and covering?
Consent decrees are more effective at de-policing a city than Defund the Police. And they give more jobs to bureaucrats and grifters. Just watch for the DEI types who make big coin "reforming" the Minneapolis Police Dept.
Doesn't this make it obvious that Democrats came up with "Defund the Police" movement as a distraction to how they run the police that killed George Floyd, and all the other abuse police dished out. Police they hired, trained, wrote the policies, and managed. The Chief of Police reports to the Mayor so the police essentially exist for the political machine running these big cities for decades. It's abuse of power.
Now we're experiencing the result of their lie to cover up the unconstitutional manner they operate.
When looking to buy pull-out couches, there are several options to consider. You can check furniture stores such as IKEA, Ashley HomeStore, and Wayfair. Online marketplaces like Amazon and eBay also offer a wide range of choices. Additionally, consider local classifieds, thrift stores, and online classified websites like Craigslist for potential deals.
HERE——➤ http://www.Puloutcouch.com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Gotta dunk on the Bad Oranges Man somehow. It's in the Kochtract.