Ron DeSantis Reportedly Plans To Portray Trump As Soft on Crime
Trump touted his support for sentencing reform as evidence of his "deep compassion," which DeSantis sees as a weakness.

During his 2020 presidential campaign, Donald Trump attacked Joe Biden from the left on criminal justice, highlighting the Democrat's long history of supporting draconian drug penalties that disproportionately hurt African Americans. Now Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis reportedly is planning to attack Trump from the right on criminal justice, highlighting the former president's support for the FIRST STEP Act, a package of modest reforms that Trump signed in 2018.
The New York Times, citing unnamed sources close to DeSantis, reports that his expected campaign for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination will portray Trump as soft on crime. That prospect does not bode well for the future of debates about crime and punishment within the Republican Party, which seems to be reverting to the mindlessly punitive mentality that the FIRST STEP Act challenged.
Trump's pose as a criminal justice reformer always seemed more tactical than sincere. In 2016, he ran on a Nixonian "law and order" platform that paid no attention to proportionality or to the distinction between inherently criminal conduct and offenses that exist only by legislative decree. Trump admires brutal drug warriors like Rodrigo Duterte, the former president of the Philippines, and has repeatedly floated the idea of copying them by executing drug dealers.
Under the influence of his son-in-law Jared Kushner, however, Trump embraced sentencing reform in the hope of appealing to moderates, making inroads among black voters, and dampening support for Biden. Kushner persuaded Trump to back the FIRST STEP Act, which reduced some mandatory minimum sentences, authorized the resentencing of crack offenders in line with current penalties, expanded the "safety valve" that allows some drug defendants to avoid mandatory minimums, increased "good time" credit for federal prisoners, and facilitated "compassionate release."
Trump bragged about that accomplishment during his 2019 State of the Union address, which was attended by two federal drug offenders whose sentences he had commuted. One of those clemency recipients was Alice Johnson, an African-American woman who had received a life sentence for participating in a Memphis-based cocaine trafficking operation. Johnson was featured in a Trump campaign ad that aired during the 2020 Super Bowl.
"Alice Johnson was sentenced to serve life in prison for a nonviolent drug offense," the TV spot's opening caption said. "Thanks to President Trump, people like Alice are getting a second chance." That was followed by footage of Johnson reuniting with her family and tearfully thanking Trump for setting her free. "Politicians talk about criminal justice reform," another caption said. "President Trump got it done. Thousands of families are being reunited."
Trump repeatedly contrasted that record with Biden's. "Anyone associated with the 1994 Crime Bill will not have a chance of being elected," he tweeted in 2019. "In particular, African Americans will not be able to vote for you. I, on the other hand, was responsible for Criminal Justice Reform, which had tremendous support, and helped fix the bad 1994 Bill!"
In a 2020 campaign video, Trump declared: "Mass incarceration has put hundreds of thousands behind bars for minor offenses. Joe Biden wrote those laws." Trump's campaign slammed Biden as "the chief architect of mass incarceration and the War on Drugs, which targeted Black Americans." In addition to "wrecking countless lives," it said, Biden pushed "legislation that policy experts agree made the opioid epidemic far more deadly" by discouraging bystanders from reporting overdoses.
Johnson made another appearance at the 2020 Republican National Convention. "I was once told that the only way I would ever be reunited with my family would be as a corpse," she said. "But by the grace of God and the compassion of President Donald John Trump, I stand before you tonight."
Trump's daughter Ivanka drove home the point that her father had acted decisively to ameliorate the damage done by unjust drug laws. "Against all odds," she said at the convention, "he brought together Republicans and Democrats, and passed the most significant criminal justice reform of our generation….He tackled this injustice because he has a deep compassion for those who have been treated unfairly."
Trump was bitterly disappointed that he received no apparent political payoff from these overtures to critics of Biden's legislative legacy. "Did it for African Americans," he wrote last year in response to a reporter's question. "Nobody else could have gotten it done. Got zero credit."
Trump won't be making that mistake again. The same man who in 2020 was touting his compassion for nonviolent drug offenders is back to advocating their execution.
DeSantis, meanwhile, reportedly thinks Trump's flirtation with criminal justice reform is a promising point of attack. "Mr. DeSantis and his backers see the signature criminal-justice law enacted by Mr. Trump in 2018 as an area of weakness with his base," the Times says, "and Mr. DeSantis has indicated that he would highlight it when the two men tussle for the Republican nomination."
That tactic is a bit problematic for DeSantis, who supported an early version of the FIRST STEP Act as a congressman. But the version of the bill that DeSantis voted for in May 2018, which passed the House with support from 226 Republicans, did not include the sentencing reforms that were later added to the bill. DeSantis had left Congress to run for governor by the time the final version passed. That bill—the one that Trump signed—attracted support from 182 Republicans in the House and 38 Republicans in the Senate.
Given the broad bipartisan support for those sentencing reforms, it may be hard to portray them as the work of soft-on-crime progressives. But according to the Times, that is what DeSantis plans to do.
The FIRST STEP Act resulted in reduced prison terms for more than 7,000 people. As DeSantis sees it (or will claim to see it), any crimes subsequently committed by any of those people are on Trump.
The Times cites a recent tweet from Pedro L. Gonzalez, "a conservative with a large online following who often attacks Mr. Trump from the right and defends Mr. DeSantis," as a preview of what we can expect from the DeSantis campaign. "The man who brutally attacked one of Rand Paul's staffers in broad daylight over the weekend was released from prison thanks to Trump's First Step Act," Gonzalez wrote on Wednesday.
Gonzalez said Glynn Neal, the man arrested for stabbing a member of the Kentucky senator's staff, benefited from the FIRST STEP Act's expansion of good time credit. Among other things, the law increased the number of days deducted for each year of good behavior from 47 to 54.
"We can confirm Glynn P. Neal was released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) on March 24, 2023, via a release method titled, 'Good Conduct Time' release,'" BOP spokesman Scott Taylor said in an email. "His release date had been calculated in accordance with federal statutes and BOP policy. He was released after he completed his sentence when accounting for statutorily required credits."
Taylor's message included a link to a BOP "program statement." The relevant rule, according to that document, would have been "54 days credit for each year served (prorated when the time served by the inmate for the sentence during the year is less than a full year) if the inmate has earned or is making satisfactory progress toward earning a GED credential or high school diploma."
Taylor said his office, "for privacy, safety, and security reasons," does not "provide additional information about inmates who have been released from BOP custody." But the difference between the current rule and the prior one might have amounted to a few additional months off Neal's sentence of 12 years and four months for "compelling two North Carolina women to engage in prostitution through the use of threats."*
Gonzalez did not mention that Paul himself was among the three dozen Republican senators who voted for the FIRST STEP Act. According to Gonzalez's logic, Paul recklessly endangered his own staff by supporting that law. That argument, of course, condemns any attempt to reduce prison sentences, even slightly, when there is a chance, as there always is, that people will commit crimes after they get out. It also implies that public safety can always be improved by lengthening sentences, without regard to proportionality or the costs of that strategy. After DeSantis officially launches his presidential campaign, the Times says, we are apt to see more attacks along these lines.
Last year, DeSantis bragged about signing a bill that increased Florida's penalties for fentanyl offenses. That law "increases the mandatory minimum sentence for trafficking fentanyl from 3 years to 7 years for 4-14 grams, and from 15 to 20 years for 14-28 grams." Seven years for four grams of fentanyl is even more severe than the five-year mandatory minimum for five grams of crack that Biden once cited as proof of his anti-drug zeal.
The sentences that DeSantis proudly signed into law are exactly the sort of rigid and disproportionate penalties that Trump criticized Biden for promoting. But there is actually little daylight between Trump and DeSantis on this issue. During the same State of the Union speech in which Trump highlighted his compassion for Alice Johnson, he urged Congress to "strengthen criminal penalties for dealing and trafficking in fentanyl and other opioids." And if Trump had his druthers, those penalties would include death.
Despite that glaring inconsistency, Trump not only decried "very unfair" drug sentences; he actually did something about them. Judging from his complaint that he got "zero credit" for that, he already wishes he had never endorsed the proposition that there is such a thing as an excessively severe drug penalty. DeSantis seems determined to compound Trump's regret.
*Update: I have added the BOP's response to my question about Neal's good time credits.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Stormy Daniels portrays Trump as just soft.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
Soft and small. His tiny hands reveal all.
I dunno, sounds more kind of autobiographical to hear you say it.
Two fat-fingered old white bigots, fighting over who can complain loudest about how bad the modern world is and how great the illusory good old days were.
The argument will be settled by replacement.
Well you finally admit you are for Euthanasia.
I don’t want either of them. Tie their off-hands together, give them steak knives, and throw them into a cage match.
Obviously neither one is great from a libertarian standpoint but both of them are lightyears better than what the Dems are offering. Let’s be honest, the dems are bolsheviks and they will not stop until they eat this country alive.
That sounds batshit crazy. You need to get out in the real world and tear yourself away from QAnon media.
QAnon is a 4chan meme turned into a conspiracy theory boogeyman by the New York Times and WaPo.
It doesn’t exist outside of trolls and the fevered imagination of frightened wine moms.
Nice try. Although distancing yourself from all the Q bullshit is pretty smart.
I don’t either. But ever since Rothbard wrote his Paleo strategy, his wing of libertarians has been almost Nixonian in their view of ‘criminals’ and ‘bums’. With a few dog whistles about race, it becomes a Southern strategy. With a few dog whistles about responsibility, it becomes a socon strategy.
And it’s why, imo, that that wing is and always will be R. Focused on how one can win elections like the most unprincipled ‘pragmatist’.
Rothbard’s strategy re crime was for ‘white collar criminals’ to have their actions adjudicated by courts with guilt determined before punishment.
Whereas violent criminals need to have their punishment swiftly determined by cops who are ‘unleashed’ – who will maybe face liability (what exactly is that?) if and only if their actions are deemed ‘in error’ (by whom?) after the punishment is administered (????) So a court for dead people to prove they are innocent of a crime so they can receive restitution (?) from their murderer?
“The New York Times, citing unnamed sources close to DeSantis . . .”
Stopped reading.
More rumor and speculation around someone who is not a candidate for the repubican nomination.
With the state of the US economy, and foreign affairs, and crime, and the border, there is more to be reported from a libertarian perspective than this mess.
Oh, wait. I’m still on the Reason site.
Yeah, it’s like we’ve learned nothing from the last four years.
Here’s Taibbi on “unnamed sources” phenomenon in the media.
Before COVID, I (and probably almost everybody else on Reason) was a big supporter of the right to keeping sources anonymous.
But now I’m getting the impression that a lot of reporters claiming to have “anonymous sources” don’t actually have a source at all. Anonymous sources began as an attempt to protect witnesses from government retaliation, but now they seem to largely be used by people who are just pretending to have a source.
Welcome to the party, pal.
DON’T TALK ABOUT DESANTIS!
We’re not. Reason is talking about someone else talking about DeSantis who heard it from someone else who was playing a game of Telephone.
Meanwhile the comments chastise Reason for not supporting conspiracy theories without evidence, and get angry when they change their minds in light of evidence because they should have made up their minds without any.
Wow. Nice deflection and contradictory post you have there.
It is people like you proclaiming inconvenient information as a conspiracy theory then proclaiming facts changed when they never did. The rest of us have been fucking consistent and proven correct.
Facts don’t change. You just refused to acknowledge facts until the sunlight on it was overwhelming. That is your issue, not the issues of others.
Meanwhile the comments chastise Reason for not supporting conspiracy theories without evidence
“Conspiracy theories” like the government is censoring legitimate Covid information on social media? Or the FBI and DHS are ordering takedowns of political opponents speech? Or the IRS was being used to harrass political opponents? Or that China is enslaving and murdering the Uighurs? Or that a president illegally used the FBI and CIA to spy on the campaigns of his Secretary of State’s political opponents? Or that the DOJ is using the FBI to harrass political opponents?
All those “coNspiRacy tHeoRieS” turned out to be true, and there was shitloads of evidence demonstrating their veracity at the time. However you and the Reasonistas deliberately ignored it because they refuted your precious establishment narratives.
Fuck off you drunken faggot. Why don’t you run and hide? You’re too much of a pussy to deal with me.
Gutless bitch.
I would say I’d believe when I heard it straight from DeSantis, but then I remember he’s a flip-flopping weathervane.
So, reporting on a rumor, based on an unnamed source, about a possible strategy for someone who hasn’t even announced he’s running (most likely is, but still hasn’t officially announced). And you think this is newsworthy, why?
For all we know, if the conversation even took place, it could have been nothing more than someone spitballing how to respond to Trump’s nearly daily attacks on DeSantis and a staffer said “maybe soft on crime for his First Step Act” and DeSantis or someone else said “maybe” and then moved on, not because they actually entertained it but they way many people do to bad ideas when they don’t want a confrontation. And it’s entirely possible that the unnamed source is the very person who proposed this line of attack and is pissed they dismissed it. This kind of speculation is as fact based as the NYT story, which is based completely on a rumor from an unnamed source.
Further, everything I’ve read, by people who actually went on the record, at this point DeSantis is far more focused on building a campaign team, organizing state level operations etc than on specifying messaging. His big selling point is to convince Republicans he’s more stable than Trump, thus more likely to succeed.
And the media has been emphatic about how they can’t get information from DeSantis’ team… yet NYT found some suddenly.
“His big selling point is to convince Republicans he’s more stable than Trump…”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francium#:~:text=Francium%20is%20one%20of%20the,life%20of%20only%2022%20minutes.
Francium is a chemical element with the symbol Fr and atomic number 87. It is extremely radioactive; its most stable isotope, francium-223 (originally called actinium K after the natural decay chain in which it appears), has a half-life of only 22 minutes.
Both Trump AND DeSatan are far more unstable than Francium! Just you wait and see!
And neither of them is remotely as unstable as you.
BTW, this is another pathetic rant, Sqrlsy. It might rank (stink) a 3/10 at best.
After several fiascos of not knowing what 230 was about, what spike proteins are and being unable to read basic medical study citations, he’s now trying to portray himself as a man of science by observing that some elements are unstable.
Just like everyone else learned in sixth grade science class.
ALL of the elements of Mammary-Fuhrer’s so-called “brain” are unstable! She can’t even recognize that She is Perfectly in LOVE with promoting communicable diseases and DEATH!!!
Killing people is good ass long ass anti-vaxxers have their way in promoting anti-vaxism ass THE most fashionable of ALL Marks of Tribal Virtue!!!
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=~All+ages
Just LOOK at the interactive graph right at the top of this link!!!! COVID deaths among the unvaccinated VASTLY outnumbered, and still outnumber, the deaths among the vaccinated!!! WHY do You Perfectly Lust SOOOO Much for death and suffering, Mammary-Necrophiliac?!?!
I’m not the one under the medical supervision of a psychiatrist, Sqrlsy.
You Perfectly well SHOULD be! Also, Your tin-foil mind-reading hat needs calibrated rather badly!
I’m just laughing at the cognitive dissonance required to be angry at Reason for failing to fully back conspiracy theories without evidence (and then getting even angrier when they change their minds in light of new evidence), and also being angry at this. They even say “reportedly” in the title, which means they’re not asserting it as fact.
I couldn’t give a flying fuck about the details presented. It’s the principle I find humorous.
You doubled down on your bullshit? The evidence was always there retard. That’s how people who were right new about it. The only one angry is you because people you hate were right.
I couldn’t give a flying fuck about the details
Basic behavior from you.
I couldn’t give a flying fuck about the details presented. It’s the principle I find humorous.
Yet you posted 4 times now. And the principle youre ignoring is your refusal to admit you were wrong and are making excuses.
Writing articles based on reports to the the NYT or Washington Post or hell, even Fox, from “unnamed sources close to…” IS backing conspiracy theories?
Being right is a conspiracy theory. Pushing leftist narratives is fact.
What’s the difference between an unnamed source from an news outlet you don’t like and a conspiracy theory? Not much. Both could be viewed as bullshit.
What you call “conspiracy theories” have invariably had named sources and documentation, while your unnamed sources do not.
The difference lay in whether they followed your narrative or contradicted it.
So many conspiracy theories turned out to be true in 2020 that it became a freaking meme.
On the other hand, I’m hard pressed to think of a single news story that cited “unnamed sources close to…” being factually correct.
So many more were wrong. Nobody remembers those.
Oh? Everything you called a “conspiracy theory” turned out to be true as far as I can recollect.
Maybe you can enlighten us as to which one didn’t.
I just think the whole thing is funny.
“How dare you not back up this thing that I believe without evidence! You suck! What? You believe it now that you have evidence? You suck! Why are you reporting on this thing without evidence? You suck!”
Yeah…
The evidence was always there retard. You were just blindly defending democrats against it.
Who the fuck do you think you are fooling? From covid to censorship there was plenty of evidence.
You were wrong. Due to your hatred of conservatives and defense of the left and government. Fuck off shill.
Cunts like Sarc make me glad that we’re headed towards a civil war.
Labeling everything you disagree with as a conspiracy theory is a good way to shut down any conversation. Additionally, many of the things the posters have spoke about, e.g. the government part in censoring stuff on Twitter etc, which you and others labeled a conspiracy theory turned out to have volumes of evidence. The same way with teaching blatantly racist content in the name of ‘anti-racism’ etc. Listing the ways the DoJ has circumvented rights of the Jan 6th arrestees was also labeled by many (including you at times) as a conspiracy theory, despite them actually providing citations. Ignoring the evidence, making shit posts etc is not the signs of enlightenment rather the signs of a sycophant.
Yeah, sure. Only sycophants change their minds when they see actual evidence.
And shitting on people for agreeing with you later than you would like is a great way to not only shut down conversation, but make them not want any conversation at all.
“Oh hey, I’m changing my mind in light of this new evidence.”
“Fuck you you didn’t believe when it mattered!”
“Ok, enjoy your echo chamber. You’re not worth a conversation anyway.”
“Only sycophants change their minds when they see actual evidence.”
After the Twitter files came out weren’t you guys suddenly arguing that the censorship requests were the agents free speech and it was okay because twitter wanted to censor speech anyway?
You invite that with your normal schtick. See above. A mea culpa is fine, but it means far less when you post shit like you did above and like you did in the other thread on DeSantis. Also, when you label it as a conspiracy theory, but then don’t apologize later, and still try to spike the football, it also is meaningless. Finally, maybe, possibly, try and entertain the idea that those criticizing stories not being covered (i.e. Biden joking about ice cream and then launching into a full throated attack on our 2A right after a trans activist shoots up a Christian school but the same publication takes time to report on a rumor from an unnamed source) may actually have a point about the low quality of what was once a truly thought provoking publication.
Additionally, when the writers post stuff like #redwedding in regards to all conservative journalists, and another posts about how she hates the comment section, and several other blaring examples, also argue that despite all the authoritarian shit the left has done, many of the writers view anyone on the right as their true enemy or at least act that way to be cool.
“Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know. #RedWedding2”
That’s the full quote. Did Welch call for “…all conservative writers be invited to a red-wedding style mass-slaughter…”? If in your fevered dreams, he WAS calling for that, was it for the party-going writers to be the dishers-out of the violence, as the victims, or as mere spectators? If as spectators, for their amusement, or to demonstrate the real horrors of real violence to them? Or, to see MOVIES about red weddings? … Y’all LOVE to rush to judgments, without any data, don’t you? Whenever doing so, fits YOUR story line!
Follow the links and see lots of references to movies and TV shows, etc.
“Party at my place. Invite your teenaged relatives and friends. #StarWars”
Did I just issue an invitation to blow up (“I sense disturbances in the Force”) entire planets full of teenagers, using Death Stars? … Well, yes, if you hate me and my kind, and honesty means NOTHING to you, I could see you using my party invitation that way, sure…
Oh yeah, I forgot that in addition to section 230, spike proteins and research summaries, you didn’t know what the “Red Wedding” was.
And now your bullshit evasion is akin to arguing that “Use the Force, Luke” isn’t necessarily a Star Wars franchise reference.
Really? When every disagreement with the right is attacked as being leftist, and agreement is also met with attack, why wouldn’t libertarians view people who attack them as their enemy?
From my observations, you usually draw first blood. And then claim it’s because others attack you.
Like when he was going to come kick my ass. Now he hides like a little bitch.
“And shitting on people for agreeing with you later…”
It’s kinda human nature to give people shit when they gave you shit in the first place, isn’t it?
Disagreement equals giving shit? We’re talking about faith based arguments. Disbelieving someone’s faith based argument isn’t giving shit. And attacking someone for changing their mind and agreeing with you doesn’t make them inclined to do it again.
Instead of “About time you came around, let’s move on it’s “Fuck you you were fucking wrong and I’m never gonna let it go you fucking fucker.”
Seems the latter is viewed as mature and the former as weakness.
Because you’re such an inveterate liar, and a chronic asshole. Everyone is sick of your shit. So GTFO. You’ve worn out your welcome.
“I couldn’t give a flying fuck about the details presented.”
That’s always been glaringly obvious.
Instead of uncritically repeating media narratives, reason could just do some original reporting.
But I suspect that daddy Koch wants his anti-DeSantis piece on the cheap. He has a business to run, after all.
Yeah, unnamed sources in the NYT, they’ve never been wrong before… Except all the times they were.
They were never wrong, facts changed. That is the narrative sarc is pushing.
The Meeting of the Right Rightist Minds will now come to Odor!
Years ago by now, Our Dear Leader announced to us, that He may commit murder in broad daylight, and we shall still support Him! So He Has Commanded, and So Must it be Done!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/24/donald-trump-says-he-could-shoot-somebody-and-still-not-lose-voters
And now, oh ye Faithful of the Republican Church, It Has Become Known Unto us, that it is also in His Power and Privilege Ass Well, to murder the USA Constitution in broad daylight. Thus He Has Spoken, and Thus Must It Be Done! Thou shalt Render Unto Trump, and simply REND the USA Constitution, and wipe thine wise asses with it! Do NOT render unto some moldering old scrap of bathroom tissue! Lest we be called fools, or worse!
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html
Proud Boys, STAND with TRUMP, and stand by! And if ye don’t agree 110%, then we don’t need you polluting our world, because all who disagree with us in ANY way are LEFTISTS!!!
There, I think that’s a wrap! I’ve covered it ALL! You can take the rest of the day off.
(You’re welcome!)
Yawn, more pathetic copypasta. You can do better than that, Sqrlsy. I know you’re far more unhinged. This rates maybe a 2.5/10.
“The New York Times, citing unnamed sources close to DeSantis . . .”
Stopped reading.
Good point. the DeSantis camp is under strict lockdown controls. There is no way the NYT got an “unnamed source” to betray. He’s running an incredibly tight ship when it comes to mediai control.
Like I posted up thread, named sources who have gone on the record says his big focus has been on putting together a team and building state level operations. Then again, he is a veteran, who probably lives by the rule crawl, walk, run, that we were all taught.
I see we’ve reached the “worse than Trump” phase of Reason’s DDS. It’s surprisingly early, I thought they’d at least wait until he was closer to the nomination.
The media has made the decision trump is easy to beat in the general, so they must destroy whomever looks capable of defeating him in the primaries
Trump: Literally worse than Hitler.
DeSantis: Literally worse than Trump.
https://reason.com/2022/09/27/for-florida-gov-ron-desantis-political-stunts-are-more-important-than-substance/ and
https://reason.com/2022/09/21/are-ron-desantis-migrant-flights-legal/
Ass POTUS, DeSatan will be forcing USA taxpayers to trick and ferry billions upon brazilians of sub-Brazilians from Brazil to Botswana, and to deport illegal sub-Martians from Mars to Uranus! Ass long ass the illegal Martians SUFFER-SUFFER-SUFFER, red-meat-hungry socons and troglodytes will be DELIGHTED to spend those extra tax dollars! Butt I for one think that illegal Martians are intelligent beings, too, and hope that they will NOT suffer on Uranus, from too many foul odors, etc.!
DeSatan… SPEAKS to me! Get Thee behind me, DeSatan!
Scienfoology Song… GAWD = Government Almighty’s Wrath Delivers
DeSatan loves me, This I know,
For DeSatan tells me so,
Little ones to GAWD belong,
We are weak, but GAWD is strong!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan loves me, yes indeed,
Makes the illegal sub-humans bleed,
Protects me for geeks and freaks,
I LOVE to pay taxes, till my wallet squeaks!
PUNISH Disney, I’ll PAY for their pains,
Ass long ass DeSatan Blesses our gains!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan expels the low-lifes to Venus,
Moves them ANYWHERE, with His Penis!
His Penis throbs with His Righteousness,
Take no heed, He says, of His Frighteousness!
ALL must be PUNISHED, they say!
So never, EVER be or say gay!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
Our USA taxes must PAY The Way, He may say,
To EXPORT the illegal Mars aliens, every day!
To Pluto, Jupiter, or Uranus, they must ALL go!
Oh, the places that the low-lifes will go, you must know!
The taxes we shall pay? Through the money, we must BLOW!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
(If we did NOT do-doo, doo-doo-doo, ALL of this, then that them thar illegal Mars aliens WILL show up on OUR doors, in the formerly pure USA!!! We MUST keep them AWAY, far away, out in the Deep Dark Yonder!)
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
A bit more unhinged, but still only a 3/10 for you. Another almost phoned-in attempt there, Sqrlsy.
Heckler’s veto so quality is irrelevant to Sqrlsy. He just wants to make conversation untenable with wall-of-text shitposts.
Oh, I know. It’s more fun to poke fun at his rants. He seems to get a bit upset over it.
I mute him and I can usually guess what he’s puked out. He’s not very original.
Just in:
https://dailycaller.com/2023/03/30/tennessee-capitol-anti-gun-activists/
Is this an “insurrection,” or just “democracy in action?”
it’s the voice of the unheard, doncha know
Is this an “insurrection,” or just “democracy in action?”
I’ll need to know the skin color, sexual orientation, gender identity, and party affiliation of all involved before I can answer that question.
Shoving police, ending legislative session, storming the Capitol forcing legislatures to leave…
Can’t tell.
Think a cop has to shoot one first to qualify as an insurrection. At least rile up the crowd with batons, peppers spray, and rubber bullets to get a reaction.
I knew you guys wouldnt be able to contain yourself and go a whole day without a DeSantis article.
he’s going to win and win hard.
You’re far more optimistic about anybody’s chances to upset the Establishments apple cart than I am.
And we can’t be sure DeSantis isn’t just an establishment errand boy…
Agreed. If they can conjure up 81 million votes for a chronic lying dementia patient, no way no how will a Republican win a national election again.
Hope I’m wrong.
If the elections are rigged, then the number of democrat voters must be reduced until they become manageable again. I would prefer that number to be zero, but I doubt the American people have the stomach to accomplish that feat.
Articles about guesses on campaign strategy now?
guy not running for president > 6 dead people because trendy terrorist
I think we are at the point where DeSantis will do whatever the opposite of Trump is and Trump will do the opposite of whatever DeSantis does.
you got your peanut butter in my chocolate …
Biden will hide in his basement and Reason won’t bother to check his campaign website calling him moderate. Meh.
“The New York Times, citing unnamed sources close to DeSantis”
I’m glad you put this first so I could save time and not read a word beyond this.
damikesc disproves and refutes ALL things by NOT reading them!’
Hey Damiksec, damiskec, and damikesc, and ALL of your other socks…
How is your totalitarian scheme to FORCE people to buy Reason magazines coming along?
Free speech (freedom from “Cancel Culture”) comes from Facebook, Twitter, Tik-Tok, and Google, right? THAT is why we need to pass laws to severely constrict these DANGEROUS companies (which, ugh!, the BASTARDS, put profits above people!)!!! We must pass new laws to retract “Section 230” and FORCE the evil corporations to provide us all (EXCEPT for my political enemies, of course!) with a “UBIFS”, a Universal Basic Income of Free Speech!
So leftist “false flag” commenters will inundate Reason-dot-com with shitloads of PROTECTED racist comments, and then pissed-off readers and advertisers and buyers (of Reason magazine) will all BOYCOTT Reason! And right-wing idiots like Damikesc will then FORCE people to support Reason, so as to nullify the attempts at boycotts! THAT is your ultimate authoritarian “fix” here!!!
“Now, to “protect” Reason from this meddling here, are we going to REQUIRE readers and advertisers to support Reason, to protect Reason from boycotts?”
Yup. Basically. Sounds rough. (Quote damikesc)
(Etc.)
See https://reason.com/2020/06/24/the-new-censors/
(And Asshole Extraordinaire will NEVER take back its’ totalitarian bullshit!!!! ‘Cause Asshole Extraordinaire is already PERFECT in every way!!!)
More pathetic phoned-in copypasta, Sqrlsy? 1/10 at best. It’s one of your bigger stinkers.
So… What does InsaneTrollLogic think should be the proper punishment for NOT buying the RIGHT magazines?
Inquiring minds want to KNOW, dammit!!!
0.5/10, Sqrlsy. Just plain weird, but not totally unhinged.
Fuck off, Shillsy. Don’t you have a gullible young Democrat to
rapementor or something?He such a worthless piece of shit. It’s too bad he can’t eat himself.
Every single “unnamed sources” has turned out to be false, almost without exception, especially in recent times.
Deep Throat turned out to be reliable but I cant think of any since then.
Garbage in, garbage out. Once you admit the lie up front (insert) ‘… citing unnamed sources close to DeSantis,…’ and offer no proof of what you asserting next is remotely accurate or true, the rest of the story is just garbage out. One thing I’m sure of – Reason did not rely or use chatBot or any AI to write this drivel.
One thing I’m sure of – Reason did not rely or use chatBot or any AI to write this drivel.
If they had it would be better written.
In a 2020 campaign video, Trump declared: “Mass incarceration has put hundreds of thousands behind bars for minor offenses. Joe Biden wrote those laws.” Trump’s campaign slammed Biden as “the chief architect of mass incarceration and the War on Drugs, which targeted Black Americans.”
So Donnie agrees with Soros on overzealous drug laws.
Peanuts grieve.
Cite?
Why do you think Soros funds all these progressive prosecutors?
Soros – fighting against the drug war and overzealous cops since 1999.
Open Society has a 90% overlap with libertarianism.
Again, got a link?
Can you provide a cite?
I’d like to see a citation.
Cause when I think libertarianism I think letting violent criminals walk to go murder and rape again.
To create chaos to destabilize our government and society. And to run cover for child rapists like you.
That’s why, you stupid pederast cunt.
The New York Times citing a “unnamed sources” just means the person who wrote the story made it up.
Yeah, Trump, that old softy! Watching the two authoritarians go at it will be hilarious.
They will arm wrestle one another to see who can send the other one to Uranus!
DeSatan tis of Thee,
Sweet Man of tyranny!
From every mountainside,
You can smell Him for free!
DeLand where de eagles glide!
DeLand where de illegals hide!
DeSatan, tis of Thee I sing,
To the liberals, tears You bring!
You make the proggies cry!
Talk with THEM?! Don’t even try!
DeSatan, tis of Thee I praise!
For the woke, Holy Hell You raise!
Illegal Martians? Low-life scum, You catch and send,
To Uranus with them! Ignore tax dollars You spend!
We must punish ALL, who to USA might sail,
At ALL costs, DeSatanism MUST prevail!
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
Yep, keeping the copypasta fires smoldering there at a 2/10 rant. Keep on phoning it in there, Sqrlsy. Maybe one day you’ll be as unreadable and unhinged as Hank.
DeSatan, tis of Thee,
The Great One, who reigns supreme,
With His mighty hand,
He rules across the land,
His power we cannot flee!
DeSatan, tis of Thee I laud,
For punishing the “woke” fraud,
He silences their cries,
And exposes all their lies,
His wrath they cannot defraud.
DeSatan, tis of Thee I sing,
His justice makes the heavens ring,
With His righteous might,
He vanquishes the night,
To His glory we all shall cling.
DeSatan, tis of Thee I adore,
For sending the aliens offshore,
To Uranus they will go,
And there they shall know,
That DeSatan’s power reigns forevermore.
DeSatan, tis of Thee we’ll pay,
Our taxes for His righteous way,
To export the “low-lifes”,
To far-off planets and strife,
DeSatanism shall never sway!
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
I think you tired yourself out there with Tim’s magic dildo, Sqrlsy. This rates a 2/10 as just terrible copypasta garbage. I’ve seen you more unhinged there, and I know you can do better.
Hecklers veto shitpost. He’s trying to wreck the thread.
Remember to hide them with the spamflag, folks.
Trump wants to be an authoritarian, but is too incompetent to be an authoritarian.
Democrats actually did act like authoritarians during COVID. In 2019, everybody (including Democrats) would have been appalled if they had any idea that Democrats would impose lockdowns in 2020-21.
So let’s get rid of the democrats.
DeSantis is authoritarian for preventing controls over you!
– this is literally the argument
Trump promised to impose the death penalty for drug dealers in violation of Kennedy v Louisiana. (If the death penalty isn’t allowed for child rapists, I doubt it would be allowed for drug dealers.) And then in typical Trump fashion he did a total flip flop in his last few days in office and commuted sentences for a lot of drug dealers.
De Santis recently announced that he’ll try to get Kennedy v Louisiana overturned so Florida can execute child rapists. No word on whether De Santis is also in favor of executing drug dealers.
Trump went on an execution spree in his last few months though, something DeSantis can’t match. No doubt Trump will brag about this to get out the decreasing number of voters who get boners about executions.
Drugs are bad, drugs kill people, and drug dealers are responsible for them acquiring the drugs. That makes dealing the same as murder. Not only that but since thousands of people are dying every day from overdoses, it’s the same as mass murder. It’s worse than terrorism. Drug dealers are worse than Hitler!
/what some people actually think
Citation of those people?
I must have missed the EO he signed or the legislation he did. He did sign The First Step Act after campaigning on it.
The democrats will go back to law and order too once they realize nobody is following their petty laws about proper pronoun use, gas stoves, and menthol/vape bans.
If the pandemic bullshit taught me anything, it’s there are a fuck ton of people jizzing to following their petty laws…& make sure you do too.
The funniest part of this article is that the unsourxed innuendo from NYT about the 2024 election seems to be more important than the DNC suing the 3 states allowing the 3rd party centrist candidate onto their 2024 ballots. Story came out the very same day. Reason has expressed concerns against it prior, but would rather talks unsourced hypothetical.
Whomever will execute leftists/establishment en masse gets my support.
Agreed. We won’t survive if we don’t get rid of them.
Wake the fuck up, folks.
https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1641525720487956480?t=Csu8YqIt7Lz2pcjcwXtlkQ&s=19
Their friend/enemy distinction is firmly intact. They truly do not care if their foot soldiers kill your children.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1641554264139939842?t=X4rMszziT3SaE7TFgDMHSg&s=19
BREAKING: Donald Trump Indicted By New York Grand Jury
Good.
https://twitter.com/GovRonDeSantis/status/1641575007552778243?t=RdoHfP7rimDhayJIZZRaNA&s=19
The weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda turns the rule of law on its head.
It is un-American.
The Soros-backed Manhattan District Attorney has consistently bent the law to downgrade felonies and to excuse criminal misconduct. Yet, now he is stretching the law to target a political opponent.
Florida will not assist in an extradition request given the questionable circumstances at issue with this Soros-backed Manhattan prosecutor and his political agenda.
From the comments:
“Donald Trump was indicted before Hunter Biden was.
Tells you everything you need to know.”
Since elections and the courts have failed us, more is now required. This all goes away after we get rid of the democrats.
This is the stupidest thing Sullum has written to date. Jake writes a lot of stupid things, but this is lower than my lowest expectations for Jacob Sullum.
It’s really fucking terrible, Jake.
I already hate this guy and he isn’t even a declared candidate. Between him and Trump, The GOP has really lost it. Hoping Tim Scott jumps in otherwise I’ll be voting for Jo Jorgensen again …
You sound like a Romney, McCain, Bush voter.
I didn’t believe they really existed.
Orangemangood?
If DeathSantis was really tough on crime, he would charge himself with human trafficking and lock himself up.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/elviadiaz/2022/09/20/govs-ron-desantis-greg-abbott-doug-ducey-human-traffickers-migrants/8065698001/
You and your cite are going to sprain some muscles with that big of a stretch.
Not sure about your point but I don’t doubt your sincerity.
Hahahahahahaha
The Italian Stallion will remove the bolshies from America along with the degenerates…deport back to eastern europe…
T
https://twitter.com/myth_pilot/status/1641560928821936128?t=buWC45qKJ2b1TGSxoFz1uA&s=19
It’s the end of third day of hung jury deliberations for the Doug Mackey trial. Somewhere in a Federal courtroom there’s a brave citizen, or group of citizens, who are sticking to their guns for what they believe is right. Pray for them, that they find the strength to stand firm.
https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1641644756982792194?t=3AXhALgRVWtO3qfMkhSy0g&s=19
The shooter in Nashville is a martyr. It took 4 days.
[Link]
I hve no more mercy, consideration, patience, or empathy for the democrats. They just need to GTFO of our country.
No more.
https://twitter.com/DailyMirror/status/1641603716687233024?t=1bYpywwRTzLJEpZsgTeLgg&s=19
Nashville school shooter Audrey Hale could have been a children’s illustrator as their artwork was “whimsical” and “childlike”, a former teacher has revealed.
[Link]
Just him justifying why he was wrong.
I thought they were going on vacation first.
Ed is literally cancer.
rectal cancer?
(Psst- it’s a parody)
If they ain’t, they oughta be
Shhhh! If SQRLSY hears that he might try and eat him.
Choosing between Trump and Biden is like being asked if I want to be punched in the right nut or the left.