Mike Pompeo Says He 'Grew Up Libertarian'
These days, he may run for president. His politics have changed.

Former CIA Director and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will probably run for president.
People call him a "staunch conservative."
In our extended interview, I give him a hard time about that.
"Conservative" once meant promoting limited government. But lately Republicans push new regulations and drive up America's debt by spending more.
Pompeo surprised me by agreeing that, under former President Donald Trump, Republicans spent too much. He surprised me again by saying that entitlements must be cut and that we don't need to spend more on our military. That was refreshing.
Then we talked about the border.
"Immigrants made America," I point out.
"I'm an immigrant," Pompeo responds. "My ancestors came through a legal process. This is the difference."
But today, I point out, the "legal process" for an ambitious person who wants to work is nearly impossible. "You might get in after waiting 12 years!"
"Whatever the rules…you got to enforce it," Pompeo responds.
"Shouldn't we change the rules?" I ask.
"I actually think it's time to take a break," says Pompeo. Today, people apply for asylum and then stay until their request is accepted or denied. When Pompeo was secretary of state, he says he told Mexican officials, "You're not going to have these people traveling in caravans through your country. We're sending them back to you."
President Joe Biden reversed that policy. "You can now see 4 million illegal immigrants in just 24 months," says Pompeo. "This will fundamentally change the nature of our country…drugs came across our borders. There's not much difference between a cartel leader and a jihad leader."
"Why not legalize drugs?" I ask. "Then cartel leaders wouldn't exist!"
"It's a terrible idea," Pompeo responds. "You see the decimation that we have from our drug culture today."
"That's because it's illegal!" I push back.
"It's not," responds Pompeo. "There's too much product available. Family institutions are beginning to fray in ways that are fundamentally dangerous to the United States."
His answer makes no sense. Families fray, and drugs are shipped despite our drug war. The war creates a black market that causes crime. There are no alcohol "cartels," only because we ended Prohibition.
But I won't convince Pompeo. Or you, probably.
I ask Pompeo why America needs 54,000 troops in Japan and 36,000 in Germany. "We won those wars! Now those countries should defend themselves."
Xi Jinping is the "singular greatest threat in the history of our nation," says Pompeo. If we bring all the troops home, that will "put the American people at enormous risk."
Pompeo calls Edward Snowden "a traitor" who should be executed. Snowden stole documents from the National Security Agency that showed how our government illegally spied on Americans.
I call Snowden a hero for risking his freedom and career to reveal the truth.
Pompeo says secrets Snowden revealed endangered Americans. But our spies often exaggerate their importance. For instance, the NSA claimed its mass surveillance stopped 54 terrorist attacks. Then the number dropped to seven. Then government reviews concluded that mass surveillance did not stop a single attack.
"You can't just steal American secrets," says Pompeo. "If you find something illegal, there is a process to correct it."
But people who used that process had their homes raided—their careers ended. I understand why Snowden sneaked out of the country.
Another area where Pompeo and I disagree is Trump's tariffs.
"Tariffs mainly punish the American consumer," I point out. Tariffs make goods more expensive.
"Tariffs are a very blunt instrument," acknowledges Pompeo, but they "solve a very real challenge. How is it you prevent an adversarial nation from screwing you in their trade relationships?"
The Chinese do cheat. They steal intellectual property. But tariffs haven't stopped that. The Chinese also foolishly subsidize some industries. But so do we!
Free trade benefits everyone. That's one reason I'm a libertarian.
Pompeo does want to cut government. Why isn't he a libertarian?
"I grew up libertarian," he says. "The idea of less government power being better for the American people is something that is very near and dear to my heart."
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
"These days, he may run for president."
Yeah. Great. Go for it. You have the same chance Larry Hogan does.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Pompeo’s chances of being elected president ar e only slightly greater than mine.
ENB is libertarian (tm)
you misspelled 'Libertine', Chumby.
Be careful. She’ll dox you, and then ban your account.
"Why not legalize drugs?" I ask. "Then cartel leaders wouldn't exist!"
Is Stossel retarded? Legalize the drugs all you want, they still have to be grown, processed, and distributed. The cartels have all that down already and would continue to exist.
Avocados and eggs seem to be a new source of revenue for cartels.
As will many other things. Between the stupidity from Biden, and Newsom.
Just like the illegal alcohol cartels during Prohibition took over the legal booze business? Oh, wait...
Ever heard of Pfizer?
It's a more powerful cartel than those brown people running shit in Mexico.
Oh, yeah. Remember that story about Pfizer executives capturing a school bus full of children, torturing and killing them.
●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started..........
See this article for more information————————>>>http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Good point, Episiarch! Pfizer only killed a bunch of niggers, after all. Not like their lives were worth anything, right?
Why do you hate blacks so much?
Remember that Netflix miniseries about what a crazy, murderous mofo Al Bourla is?
Yeah, he was played by a genderfuck latinx black transperson of color, right?
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you……>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
If they exist in a legal framework more power to them. If they use threats to control the growers the growers can call the cops. Can't do that now.
If the cartels are illegal in another country, that's their problem. We don't need to inquire as to the legality of products in another country to enjoy them here. We buy Chinese goods, after all.
But with no more monopoly under legalization, competitors with Green Revolution planting methods, Genetic Modification, and automated agriculture could create efficiencies of scale to produce drugs more plentiful, safer and cheaper, and transport them to market faster and in bigger quantities, and without exploiting slave labor to do so.
Done fully without half-assed "decriminalization," legalization would be a can't-lose proposition for anyone outside the Cartels and the Cartels would have to re-tool and adjust or die.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart
OPEN>> http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
The only way that would happen is if legal manufacturers were hit with prohibitively high taxes. Otherwise, they'd be far more efficient and they'd deliver better quality products, without the impurities and inconsistent dosing that make illegal drugs dangerous.
"I grew up libertarian,"
What happened?
Concussion on the head?
Scared by a pawn-broker sign?
Maynerd G. Krebs work ethic? ("WORK?!?!?").
Pussy-Whipped by a Commie or Nazi Femme-Domme?
Chintzy dope?
*Sigh!* Nobody Knows
Paul Brady--Nobody Knows
https://youtu.be/D0D55XI0nrw
This is a really great song I didn't know about. Thanks for this.
He probably encountered a few of the 74 IQ knuckle dragging retards like the ones that publish this magazine and realized like any sensible person that libertarianism is a fucking joke.
I'd say, "wrong audience", but in this comment section, it clearly isn't.
It is pretty bizarre just how many clearly non-libertarians go out of their way to read and comment on a libertarian site. Maybe I'm just being overly optimistic about my memories, but I'd swear the comment section around here used to feature more actual discussions than random poo flinging.
Yep. We’ve got idiots like Groomer Jeffy, Shrike, Mike Liarson, SQRLSY. etc.
One doesn't have to like Reason Magazine to say this:
Fuck Off, Psychopath!
I mean if ENB can proclaim herself a gatekeeper of libertarians, I don't see a problem here.
Most of the legacy LP got outraged at the rise of the MC and formed their own LP as well, with views of bake the cake and being race Marxists, aka antiracists. Plenty of room there for uniparty, tepid opposition people.
"'I grew up libertarian," he says. "The idea of less government power being better for the American people is something that is very near and dear to my heart."'
Methinks White Man speaks with forked tongue.
All white men do. Even uber allies.
The idea of less government power being better for the American people is something that is very near and dear to my heart.
Well unless of course less government means we don't get to station troops in sovereign foreign nations for decades, tax your purchases of foreign goods, issue permission slips to cross a line in the middle of a river, tell you what substances you can put in your body, and prosecute people who tell our subjects what we're doing. He's clearly not for that limited government.
Because national borders and trade policy are exactly like throwing people in prison for ingesting plants and murder-droning sandniggers.
We cannot continue to keep recycling the same people in DC.
We absolutely need to recycle the people in DC.
Into compost.
Why do you want to poison plants?
If you get the temperature high enough and long enough, it should cook off the toxins though a number of folks last year lost their gardens due to Grazon being present in their purchased manure compost. Not sure if it was insufficient time at temperature or if that doesn’t break down thermally. Or maybe it wasn’t cooked at all…caveat emptor.
OK, we use the compost as a RoundUp substitute.
Am waiting for the series of articles that covers one of the Reason editors documenting their gender transformation. Am hoping it is ENB so that Dee will cawpy the behavior.
Here you go
https://reason.com/1999/12/01/from-donald-to-deirdre/
In the mid-1990s renowned economic historian–and longtime REASON contributing editor–Donald N. McCloskey transformed himself into Deirdre N. McCloskey.
Wow!
nice find.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this
website........ http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Might would.
One Womajn's Adventures in Gender Crossing and Civil Disobedience
Sex, Shrinks, and the State
https://reason.com/2017/03/18/sex-shrinks-and-the-state/
As with Caroline "Tula" Cossey, I personally think the Doctors did a great job!
🙂
But lately Republicans push new regulations and drive up America's debt by spending more.
Stossel is obviously a leftist Democrat.
Yup, wanting to rein in spending is a Proggie core principle. Sigh.
I was being sarcastic.
You see, according to H&R commentors if you criticize Republicans for their profligate spending then you are obviously a partisan Democrat.
was funny.
Or if you lie about Republican spending while excusing the Democratic congress that's actually responsible for it in a desperate attempt at deflection because you're a demfag shill and child pornographer. Either way.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Pompeo: 'I was libertarian until I decided I wanted a career in politics"
> "Whatever the rules…you got to enforce it," Pompeo responds.
This is the problem with conservatism. Defend the rules, both good and bad, at all costs. It's sort of where the name comes from, they dislike change even good change, and will find excuses to keep the bad in place.
As a friend once told me, the Democrats move the goalposts and the Republicans defend them. It's why progressives are winning. Republicans need more principles than just defending the status quo.
I have been, for many years, convinced that voting for R's or D's is sort of like choosing between being slow-boiled in a kettle of hot water versus being slow-roasted over a hot fire.
And we can rely on you to support every change put forward by radical left wing Marxists while bleating like a sheep about every attempt made by conservatives to either prevent those changes or reform them after they've passed. It's almost like you're a stupid faggot Marxist piece of shit or something?
In all fairness to Brandybuck, and just because it can't be said enough:
Fuck Off, Psychopath!
If everyone was actually forced to live by all the rules, their would be a lot less rules.
after the string of the last 30 years of top men color me cynical on whether it matters who wins
Sorry guys, I don't follow the political red carpet these days, but isn't Pompeo kind of a bog-standard neocon?
White Mike, sarc, Pluggo et. al. also claim to be libertarians. I’m the king of Doggerland.
The function of government is to defend liberty anything more is tyranny.
Including slave labor to build V-2s to murder civilians...and the slavers and warlords are the guilty parties, not the victims!
Conservatives have deluded themselves (and America) to believe that they advocate freedom and liberty.
Meanwhile, after campaigning for the past two centuries to ban witches, homosexuality, business on Sundays, opium, cocaine, alcohol, heroin, marijuana, gambling, prostitution, porn (and all other non Christian activities), the theocrats who claim to support freedom continue campaigning to ban abortion, contraception, sex education, and many other things they disdain.
So much for supporting freedom.
And of course, by banning all of those activities, conservative theocrats created, enriched and emboldened the many criminals, drug gangs and cartels they keep complaining about.
Absolutely. And the Religious Right aren't even solid on economic issues, since they support "Faith-Based Initiatives" versus genuinely private charity and private investment towards enterprises that create jobs and prosperity. Christianity never was big on praising wealth or achievement.
Also, the Religious Right types were big beaters of the war drum with Iraq and the phoniness used to promote it. Some of them probably still know by heart the mostly bogus words of Darryl Worley's "Have You Forgotten?"
https://youtu.be/p6yLQRF-cEU
And while "results vary" is always the rule with private schools and homeschools, the particular curricula recommended by Religious Right types don't put private schools and homeschooling/unschooling in the best light. No sense in providing the Rev. Arties of the world with ammo against an otherwise legitimate and excellent practice.
You heard it here first folks. Hillary Clinton and Howard Dean were Religious Right theocrats. Oh wait, that only applies to the bloodlusting warmongers in the opposite party of our favorite Nazi faggot.
Oh and even though religious schools and religious homeschool students have absolutely fucking obliterated the sub-average retarded piece of shit cumpets from our favorite Nazi faggot's public child grooming program, they're still icky because... uh... well... uh... MATH IS THEOCRACY OK!!!!!!
It's a good thing you're a faggot so you'll never reproduce.
You sure do have a way with words, though not a way that corresponds with reality and certainly not one that changes minds. Throwing around racial slurs and "Faggot" sure won't get you a date from me, however much you might desire it.
And, again, you are nowhere to be found when real Nazis are in the comments.
Take yourself and your rancid, encrusted sockpuppets and jump in a washing machine and dissolve down the drain with your pharmaceuticals!
Christians have engaged in more legitimate charity than leftist atheists. Likely by an order of magnitude.
But what about investing? Investing helps enterprises that create wealth and jobs so that the poor are elevated and stay helped. With investment, it's probably a wash.
Standard government procedure: promise to solve the same problems you created.
You're not free unless you're free to cut off a 6 year old boy's penis and not tell his parents about it, right you Marxist pedophile faggot?
Also literally every single issue you mentioned besides opposition to your Moloch-worshipping child death cult was put forward by radical progressive activists in the Democratic Party from the late 1800s onward. Not conservatives. You also seem to be the only faggot piece of shit totalitarian bootlicking Nazi who wants to impose your death cultism on other people. There has never been a theocracy or anything resembling one in the United States.
In God We Trust
Fuck off, Psychopath!
Press him on what the criteria should be for whether to have use of a drug be legal or illegal, and it'll come down to: whatever is legal now should remain legal, and whatever's illegal now should remain illegal; people must've had good reasons for these distinctions, so let's rely on the wisdom of the previous generation.
You know who else used to be libertarian?
Most of the commenters here, until we concluded from the standards set by the authority of HyR that we must not be libertarian any more?
Mike Hihn? *SNICKERS*
Chortle
A-Hyuk!-Yuk!
🙂
Hihn was the most libertarian Libertarian ever to liberate, as he never tired of telling everyone.
Was he live or an early predecessor of ChatGPT?
😉
Murray Rothbard pre-1960's New Left?
Rothbard couldn't possibly have been a True Libertarian like our resident Nazi faggot. He didn't even support executing Christians and forcing children to attend taxpayer-funded molestation centers.
I see you're as addle-headed as Rothbard got as he aged.
Fuck Off, Psychopath!
Libertarian Man, before he used the molecule chamber in his Fortress of Libertarianism to change himself into an ordinary person?
You remember those cartoons from Liberty Magazine too? Those were so funny!
I liked the one where he beat up the cops who had a pot-growing Polygamist seiged on a mountain.
The toasted Tom Cat then said: "Thanks for gettin' th' pigs off my back! Care to sleep with one of my wives?"
In his stolid Batman-esque reply, Libertarian Man said: "Perhaps another time, Citizen."
🙂