Marijuana

The Anti-Pot Editorial That Cost $140 Million

After an ardent prohibitionist bought Nevada's leading newspaper, a formerly libertarian editorial board suddenly turned against marijuana legalization.

|

In May 2014, when activists began collecting signatures for a marijuana legalization initiative that will appear on Nevada's ballot this November, the Las Vegas Review-Journal welcomed the measure as "an opportunity to reset America's costly drug war." The paper's editorial board said "taxpayers finally seem to understand that spending vast sums of money at the local, state and federal levels on police, prosecutors, public defenders, judges and jails to lock up nonviolent offenders and enable the enrichment of gangs and thugs has done nothing to diminish demand for marijuana."

Last Wednesday the Review-Journal came out against the very same ballot initiative, saying "recreational weed comes with health, safety and social costs that make legalizing marijuana a dangerous proposal for Nevadans." It warned that "legalizing weed would jeopardize the health of countless Nevadans, expose more people to drug abuse and addiction, put excessive stress on the state's health-care facilities and do little to relieve the state's bloated prison population."

Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino owner and Republican megadonor, paid good money for that startling reversal, which was first noted by Tom Angell at Marijuana.com. Adelson, an ardent pot prohibitionist who bankrolled the opposition to a 2014 medical marijuana initiative in Florida that fell two points short of the supermajority required to pass a constitutional amendment, bought the Review-Journal last December for $140 million. That's 25 times what Adelson spent to defeat Amendment 2 in Florida, where he hopes to open a casino, but still just 0.5 percent of his fortune at the time, which Forbes pegged at $28 billion, making him the world's 18th richest person.

Adelson lost little time in pressuring the editorial writers at his new acquisition to reverse their position on marijuana legalization. Angell reported last January that Adelson and his wife, Miriam, "are asking editorial board members to visit a drug treatment center and reconsider the publication's support for ending prohibition." The three staff members scheduled for re-education were Glenn Cook, then interim editor and now managing editor, who last February was listed as "senior editorial writer"; Steve Sebelius, the paper's political columnist; and Patrick Everson, an editorial writer who seems to have been replaced by John Kerr, a former editorial page editor. Sebelius says he has occasionally written editorials for the paper "on an ad hoc, fill-in basis" but no longer does so and is not a member of the editorial board.

The Review-Journal's editorialists are now dutifully parroting prohibitionist talking points. "Marijuana contains nearly 500 dangerous chemicals when inhaled or ingested, including about five times more tars and other cancer-causing agents than tobacco smoke," says yesterday's editorial. "Cancer, respiratory diseases, mental illness, birth defects, reproductive problems and irreversible brain damage are all linked to marijuana use." The paper adds that "marijuana is both addictive…and a gateway to more deadly drugs." It claims "marijuana tourists are wreaking havoc on hospitals and health clinics in Colorado."

Unlike a court overturning a precedent, the paper's editorial board does not mention the Review-Journal's flip-flop, let alone try to justify it. Craig Moon, who recently replaced Jason Taylor as publisher, told Angell "the editorial was written at my request," although he claimed "the [Adelson] family was not involved."

This cannabis conversion is a sad development for a newspaper that for many years took a libertarian approach not only to marijuana but to drugs in general (as well as other issues). "This editorial page has long supported decriminalizing, regulating and taxing the sale of currently illegal drugs," the Review-Journal noted last July in an editorial criticizing New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who was then seeking the Republican presidential nomination, for continuing to support prohibition. "Legalizing drugs won't send Americans running to dispensaries to get stoned. It will simply bring the commerce out of the black market, subject it to taxation, and put drug dealers who answer to violent syndicates out of business."

The Review-Journal's opposition to the war on drugs goes back decades. The libertarian writer Vin Suprynowicz, who from 1992 until 2013 worked for the paper's opinion section (which has periodically carried my syndicated column) and ran it for part of that time, was a relentless critic of drug prohibition. A 1999 collection of his columns, titled Send in the Waco Killers, had a section devoted to "The Fearless Drug Warriors." That same year Suprynowicz began a column, "Perhaps, if we wait a little longer, the War on Drugs will grow more insane…though it would be hard."

In 2000 the Review-Journal endorsed the ballot initiative that legalized marijuana for medical use in Nevada, and two years later it supported another measure that would have gone further. The 2002 ballot initiative would have allowed adults 21 or older to possess up to three ounces of marijuana and charged legislators with creating a regulatory system for commercial producers and suppliers. The paper called the initiative, which ultimately lost by more than 20 points, "a promising first step" toward ending "the needless harassment of individuals who peacefully and privately use marijuana." As Angell notes, the Review-Journal's impatience with pot prohibition was evident as recently as December 27, when it criticized the U.S. Postal Service's attempt to discourage the mailing of periodicals that contain ads for state-licensed marijuana businesses.

But an editorial published a week earlier had already warned that change was coming in the wake of Adelson's purchase:

The Review-Journal was one of the first editorial boards in the country to condemn the failed federal war on drugs and advocate decriminalization of narcotics, starting with marijuana. The newspaper endorsed the state constitutional amendment that legalized medical marijuana and backs the approval of a 2016 Nevada ballot question to allow legal recreational marijuana. Mr. Adelson, who lost a son to a drug overdose, opposes the legalization of marijuana for any use.

The editorial predicted that the new ownership would mean "a complete reversal" of the Review-Journal's stance on drug policy. It also warned that Adelson would push the paper to abandon other libertarian positions, including its opposition to prohibition of online gambling—in which Adelson, as the owner of brick-and-mortar casinos, has a vested financial interest. Even though he made a fortune by tempting people into making losing bets, Adelson has tried to mount a moral case against online gambling. He fervently believes it is moral to put money into his pockets by gambling at his casinos but immoral to put money into his competitors' pockets by gambling online. That hypocrisy is mirrored by his stance on drugs: He insists that the government punish marijuana suppliers and consumers while he sells people alcohol, a competing intoxicant that is substantially more dangerous.

These inconsistencies make Adelson's moral crusades look more like protectionism than puritanism. But don't expect to read about those complicating contradictions in the Review-Journal.

This article originally appeared at Forbes.com.

NEXT: "If he murdered because he saw two men kiss, I say: find someone to kiss"

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. My money’s on the Review-Journal going bust before the end of the year.

    1. until I saw the paycheck four $8164 , I didnt believe …that…my brother woz like trully taking home money part-time online. . there mums best friend has been doing this for only about 6 months and as of now cleard the mortgage on their cottage and purchased a brand new Mazda . take a look at the site here??????? http://www.elite36.com/

    2. Make 14500 bucks every month… Start doing online computer-based work through our website. I have been working from home for 4 years now and I love it. I don’t have a boss standing over my shoulder and I make my own hours. The tips below are very informative and anyone currently working from home or planning to in the future could use this website.._________ http://www.earnmore9.com

  2. marijuana? in vegas? crazy

  3. Look, this sucks. But when I’m also watching the LP love on William Weld because he can bring in Super PACs and donors as well as so many involved in the Libertarian Party lusting after federal funding of the party my outrage about others using big money to get what they want is a bit diffused.

    1. Better to get 3-4 votes, miss out on the national debates, expose fewer people to what the LP is about, and not be able to have a loud megaphone to call out Trump and Hillary on their hypocrisy and idiocy. At least you’ll sleep well at night knowing that you and the other 4 True Scotsman have kept to your principles.

      Most people I know think that Thong Man is what the LP is about.

      1. There aren’t four true libertarians. If you got them in a room each of them would say the other three don’t properly adhere to libertarian principles.

        1. “THERE ARE FOUR NO LIGHTS LIBERTARIANS!”

  4. People still buy and read actual newspapers?

    1. Yes, especially Libertarians. See, they don’t want the Gubmint tracking their internet habits, so they pull the hoodie over their tin foil hat, don sunglasses, sneak out of mom’s basement, and deposit a few coins into the newspaper box.

  5. It’s heartening that they have a strict separation of business and editorial. Business has no influence at all on editorial, just like any first-rate news organization.

  6. Fuck Sheldon Adelson. If he were to be diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer, or perhaps Lou Gehrig’s disease, I wouldn’t shed a tear.

    1. He single-handedly killed the medical marijuana initiative in Florida by scaring the old people.

      I’d hope he gets an incredibly painful disease, but being rich, he could buy himself the same things he’d deny to the plebs.

    2. Or perhaps acute woodchipper syndrome.

  7. Mr. Adelson, who lost a son to a drug overdose, opposes the legalization of marijuana for any use.

    Which drug? Obviously it wasn’t weed so is this guy just stupid or evil – or both?

    1. It was cocaine and heroin, which he apparently used “from a young age”. Therefore, it’s all marijuana’s fault.

      1. So, both.

        1. Obviously he bought it with money. Control money and we’ll have the tools we need.

      2. Actually, it’s probably Sheldon Adelson’s fault. With a man like him for a father, taking drugs is the only way out.

  8. Man thats jsut not making a whole lot of sense dude.

    http://www.Got-Anon.tk

    1. Is it just me or are anonbot’s comments getting more on point?

  9. Any hope of one of the wealthy “libertarian” donors out there (Thiel, Kochs, etc.) getting involved in this to support the legalization effort?

    1. Not in a million fucking years. Koch libertarianism looks like this:

      – Deregulation: Break the chains of our federal oppressors!
      – Corporate Welfare: Opposed to handouts and tax breaks for Koch competitors. Welfare for Koch-owned business is okay tho.
      – Social Issues: Shrug. Whatever’s best for business at the time.

      Gillespie et al know the Kochs don’t give a fuck about libertarian principles, but they pragmatically just hold their noses and accept the regular donations. Gotta keep the website running and buy Robby’s expensive shampoo.

  10. As libertarians can we really fault him for being selfish? I doubt people smoking cannabis make nearly as many reckless bets as those drinking.

    1. I hope you are joking. Of course we can fault him.

      I am also skeptical that this is actually selfish on his part.

    2. As libertarians can we really fault him for being selfish?

      We don’t fault him for being selfish, we fault him for trying to corrupt government and take away people’s liberties.

  11. Certainly gambling doesn’t ruin lives! Death by suicide after gambling away one’s fortune or death by marijuana overdose. Which number is higher do you think Shelly,you cantankerous hypocrite enabler you? Shelly profits from peoples’ weaknesses and addictions, just like a drug lord.

  12. The Anti-Pot Editorial That Cost $140 Million
    After an ardent prohibitionist bought Nevada’s leading newspaper, a formerly libertarian editorial board suddenly turned against marijuana legalization.

    1. Evidently they weren’t libertarian after all. They finally came out of their political closet and announced they were either democrats or republicans. One can only imagine the “coming out” party they had.

    2. It has been estimated that about one in five people get high in this country. Just think about how much $ state and local governments are missing out on. Oh, wait. Legalizing MJ makes sense and only good would come from it. My bad.

    3. It just goes to show you what a bunch of morons we have “governing” us.

  13. Just applying The Golden Rule.

  14. Another Republican who claims to be for small limited gubmit

    1. 4″I quit my 9 to 5 job and now I am getting paid 100usd hourly. How? I work-over internet! My old work was making me miserable, so I was forced to try-something NEW. After two years, I can say my life is changed-completely for the better!Learn More From This Site…

      ======> http://www.Today70.com

  15. Remember, Sheldon Adelson is not in it to make money! Harry Reid says so!

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..88039.html

  16. Evan . if you, thought Gladys `s story is impossible… on saturday I got a new Alfa Romeo since getting a check for $5834 recently and-in excess of, ten thousand this past-munth . it’s definitly the best work Ive ever done . I began this 4 months ago and almost immediately started bringing in at least $80.. p/h . you could look here …
    ………………….. http://www.MaxPost30.com

  17. uptil I saw the bank draft four $8760 , I be certain …that…my sister woz actually bringing in money part time from there labtop. . there neighbour had bean doing this 4 only about eighteen months and resently cleard the depts on there home and bourt a top of the range Chrysler ….

    Clik This Link inYour Browser….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Reportmax20.com

  18. I’ve made $76,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student.I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money.It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it.

    Open This LinkFor More InFormation..

    ??????? http://www.Reportmax20.com

  19. Commence your Home Business right now. Hang out with your Family and Earn. Start bringing $75/hr just over a computer. Very easy way to choose your Life Happy and Earning continuously. Begin here..

    Copy This Link…

    ===== http://www.maxincome20.com

  20. my friend’s mom makes $73 hourly on the laptop . She has been out of a job for 6 months but last month her pay was $18731 just working on the laptop for a few hours…..

    Open This LinkFor More InFormation..

    ???????

    http://www.Reportmax20.com

  21. my friend’s mom makes $73 hourly on the laptop . She has been out of a job for 6 months but last month her pay was $18731 just working on the laptop for a few hours…..

    Open This LinkFor More InFormation..

    ???????

    http://www.Reportmax20.com

  22. my roomate’s step-mother makes 60 each hour on the internet and she has been out of work for seven months but last month her check was 14489 just working on the internet for 5 hours a day, look at ..
    Read more on this web site..

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.maxincome20.com

  23. before I saw the bank draft which had said $9426 , I didnt believe that…my… brother woz like actualy earning money part-time at there labtop. . there uncles cousin has done this 4 less than fifteen months and by now repaid the dept on there place and got a great new Mini Cooper . read the full info here …

    Clik This Link inYour Browser??

    ? ? ? ? http://www.selfcash10.com

  24. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..

    Clik This Link inYour Browser??.

    =========[]> http://maxincome20.com

  25. uptil I saw the bank draft four $8760 , I be certain …that…my sister woz actually bringing in money part time from there labtop. . there neighbour had bean doing this 4 only about eighteen months and resently cleard the depts on there home and bourt a top of the range Chrysler ….

    Clik This Link inYour Browser….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Reportmax20.com

  26. before I looked at the draft saying $9453 , I have faith that my mother in law woz like truley erning money part time at there computar. . there mums best friend haz done this 4 less than 14 months and just repayed the dept on their apartment and purchased a brand new Honda . read here …..

    Please click the link below
    ==========
    http://www.selfcash10.com

  27. before I saw the bank draft which had said $9426 , I didnt believe that…my… brother woz like actualy earning money part-time at there labtop. . there uncles cousin has done this 4 less than fifteen months and by now repaid the dept on there place and got a great new Mini Cooper . read the full info here …

    Clik This Link inYour Browser??

    ? ? ? ? http://www.SelfCash10.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.