Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Tonight on The Independents: Ferguson, ISIS, Rand Paul's Declaration of War, Black Friday, Our Latest Enemy of Freedom, and #LetTheTurkeyCool

Matt Welch | 11.26.2014 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Did you catch some of the Ferguson talk on last night's Independents? Here's a sampling:

On tonight's show (Fox Business Network, 9 p.m. ET, 6 p.m. PT, repeats three hours later) we'll pick up the story with a Party Panel of "Progressive Messaging Expert and all around good guy" Richard Fowler, who was on the ground in Ferguson the last few days, and Fox News correspondent Dagen McDowell. The discussion will cover, among other aspects, the exquisitely awful arguments that have arisen this week about rioting, looting, and so forth. Later in the show, the duo will discuss Democratic disaffection with Obamacare, and the eternal search for the best Thanksgiving survival tips.

Speaking of the holidays, Fox Business anchor Melissa Francis will break down the import and minimum-wage politics of Black Friday. Also, Kennedy will be making her final Quixotic push to "Let the Turkey Cool" before putting up the damned Christmas decorations….Speaking of which, please "enjoy" the following video, which is obviously TOO HOT FOR TELEVISION, and was allegedly produced by Anthony L. Fisher:

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has raised some libertarian eyebrows with his draft declaration of war against ISIS; we'll discuss the pros and cons. Speaking of ISIS, what's up with that? The Interpreter's Michael Weiss will update. And the co-hosts will declare their new Enemy of Freedom.

Follow The Independents on Facebook at facebook.com/IndependentsFBN, follow on Twitter @ independentsFBN, hashtag us at #TheIndependents, and click on this page for more video of past segments.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Police Shooting of Pre-Teen in Cleveland Caught on Surveillance Video That Contradicts Cops Claims

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsThe IndependentsWorldCulturePolicyFergusonRand PaulISISObamacare
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (189)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Christmas? I'm putting up my Easter decorations.

  2. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

    I keep all my holiday decorations up year round. Saves time.

    1. Libertarian   10 years ago

      I love this time of year. My wife quits nagging me to take down the xmas decorations.

    2. Knarf Yenrab!   10 years ago

      If you live far enough off the road, no one notices so long as you unplug the lights.

  3. GILMORE   10 years ago

    The Kmele verses of "Let the Turkey Cool" were more shockingly potent and profound than Bob Dylan's surprise contribution to 'We Are the World'

    His sensitive, gravelly, heart-melting overtones remind us of Richie Havens in his prime

    1. Knarf Yenrab!   10 years ago

      Someone's been reading old Doherty articles.

      While I was listening to a bunch of Havens videos on Youtube this morning, I discovered he did the vocals for Groove Armada's "Hands of Times," one of my favorite songs from the past few years. Probably should have known that already, but pretty cool nonetheless.

  4. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    Wow, how did Kennedy get Matt and Kmele to do that...interesting song?

    She must have taken naked photos of them at the sheepfold.

  5. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    Hey, Mrs. Montgomery, the Advent season has already begun according to the Orthodox calendar:

    http://www.theologic.com/oflweb/xmas/advcal.htm

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Romanian Christmas carol:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-akU-ni7Qw

  6. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Speaking of which, please "enjoy" the following video, which is obviously TOO HOT FOR TELEVISION, and was allegedly produced by Anthony L. Fisher...

    Fisher is going to spend his entire Red Eye appearance disavowing any connection to that video.

  7. ProLifeLibertarian   10 years ago

    Bill Nye will be in the studio later on to leave coal in everyone's stockings.

    1. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

      Nah, it will be some mythical battery that never runs out of juice.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

        Pu-239?

    2. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

      North Korean kids would love that.

  8. Los Doyers   10 years ago

    Okay, I declare this thread dead. It shall be buried at sea with full honors.

  9. juris imprudent   10 years ago

    Isn't there supposed to be a day of recovery between episodes?

  10. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Okay, I figure this applies most to the lushes who comment here.

    God I hope this guy is right!

    The Truth We Won't Admit: Drinking Is Healthy

    In fact, the evidence that abstinence from alcohol is a cause of heart disease and early death is irrefutable?yet this is almost unmentionable in the United States. Even as health bodies like the CDC and Dietary Guidelines for Americans (prepared by Health and Human Services) now recognize the decisive benefits from moderate drinking, each such announcement is met by an onslaught of opposition and criticism, and is always at risk of being reversed.

    Noting that even drinking at non-pathological levels above recommended moderate limits gives you a better chance of a longer life than abstaining draws louder protests still. Yet that's exactly what the evidence tells us.

    Driven by the cultural residue of Temperance, most Americans still view drinking as unhealthy; many call alcohol toxic. Yet, despite drinking far less than many European nations, Americans have significantly worse health outcomes than heavier-drinking countries...

    1. John Quincy Addingmachine   10 years ago

      This chick had it all figured out:

      Calment ascribed her longevity and relatively youthful appearance for her age to a diet rich in olive oil[4] (which she also rubbed onto her skin), as well as a diet of port wine, and ate nearly one kilogram (2.2 lb) of chocolate every week.

      She also smoked for nearly a century. The kilogram of chocolate a week is what really impresses me.

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Remember when Dr. Johnny Fever's reflexes improved each time he took a drink thus defying and angering the state trooper trying to prove alcohol slows your reaction time?

      Evidently I do.

    3. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      Of course you had to add non-pathological:(

  11. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    Where's my CANCON?!

  12. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    How effen useless is CNN Money? I came across this '5 Stunning Facts about McDonald's' clip. Never mind that there's nothing 'stunning' about it to the extent we already know these facts. However, notice the little game they play with the CEO's pay of $9.5 (even though one of their 'stunning' facts discloses McDonald's revenues of $28 billion. 9 million into 28 billion is?) and then providing a figure for how long it would take for a worker to reach $9.5. Like who cares and how is that even relevant?

    http://money.cnn.com/video/new.....=V_Taboola

    1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

      When your life revolves around envy, its the most important.

    2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

      I can see someone being concerned about inequality other than because of envy. You could think it's a bad way to run a business (Toyota is a bigger company and it's CEO makes only 1.7 million). You could think inequality leads to instability. You could think that since money is tied to important things in life, including necessities, that there are problems with inequality. To the extent money is power there's that too.

      1. Irish   10 years ago

        And none of those problems can be effectively solved through government coercion, purposeful market distortions, and threats of violence, which is the preferred leftist solution to, well, everything.

        1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

          I absolutely agree, if anything such coercion nearly always makes things worse (and is immoral in itself, imo).

        2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          A baseball player named Stanton who most of you (and me until this week) never heard of just signed a contract for $325 million over 13 years, or $25 million a year. Why do we never hear how many hours the peanut vendor for that same baseball team would have to work until he makes $25 million?

          I'll tell you why. The average prog recognizes that talented movie stars and athletes are extremely talented and doesn't begrudge them the big bucks. But at the same time they don't believe the average CEO is any smarter than a burger flipper, he just got lucky or met someone or went to the right school. And since the top people at top corporations are just average joes in accidental positions, they don't deserve much more than the average worker's salary in their minds, and its an outrage when they do.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            Yes. This is what they believe and it's absurd.

            1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

              You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains.

              X325M

          2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

            It is common for leftists to foolishly discount the value of management. Didn't Lenin think they were totally superflous and then found how valuable they were the hard way? Having said that, there are lots of institutional ways that CEO pay might not reflect their actual value.

            1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

              So don't buy the stock.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                Yes, I'm not arguing it's something on the same level as governmental misdealings, just that it's not necessarily cut and dry market workings that create management compensation.

            2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

              there are lots of institutional ways that CEO actor and athlete pay might not reflect their actual value.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                Yes. I'm not sure most 'lefties' are not outraged by player and entertainer salaries, so I'm not sure what you're getting from that.

              2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

                It is also true that there are lots of institutional ways that someone getting minimum wage might not reflect their actual lack of value.

      2. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

        Money is not power.

        Government is power.

        Inequality doesn't lead to instability. Believing it does is irrelevant.

        1. Irish   10 years ago

          Envy leads to instability. Inequality is just the excuse people use so that they don't have to admit that their real problem is their own vices.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

            And inequality doesn't help envy out?

            1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

              No. There will always be reason to be jealous. Stop concern trolling.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                People will always be jealous, but I bet that still wouldn't stop you from telling your friend not to act in certain ways with other women while his girlfriend is around, even if you think she shouldn't become jealous over those actions.

            2. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

              Meh, inequality is written into our dna. We're primates, not sand fleas.

            3. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

              The fear that inequality leads to instability reveals the left's stasis fetish.

              It's also backwards (as is most leftist thinking). In the modern world, instability creates inequality. Great wealth is captured by people who create revolutionary new products or organizational structures. Which dissipates over time and is finally replaced by a new wave of innovators.

        2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

          If power is the likelihood of getting other people to do what you want then of course money is power.

          As for inequality not leading to instability, that's to deny that envy (or a sense of 'injustice') does exist, is fairly common among people and that it might spur people to act in ways bad for social order.

          1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

            Power is having the ability to apply force.

            You tell me one thing someone with money can legally force me to do?

            Only government can force me to do anything. Everything else is voluntary.

            1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

              Since TNSTAAFL people need money to live and so you will have to do some things in your life for it. You might not be forced to do any particular thing in this process, but you're forced into the process to some degree.

              Of course, if you're just going to define power to mean what you want it to mean, then of course you win the argument about what power is. But the word generally means more than just 'what a person is forced to do by threat of violence.'

              1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

                Fine.

                But within the context of inequity, one person having wealth does not negatively impact the person who does not.

                1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                  Do you think if I were granted two votes in elections and you were restricted to one that that would have any negative impact on you?

                  1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

                    Huh?

                    1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                      I think you'd object to it because, even if I don't use my votes to harm you, it unfairly grants me more power than you. Now, if money is power...

                    2. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

                      But, wealthy people don't get two votes, Bo.

                    3. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                      I thought you conceded that money could in a sense be power?

                    4. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

                      No, I admitted that power wasn't necessarily force, but could be influence.

                    5. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                      You don't think money can have influences? I'm analogizing why someone would be upset about someone having more power (influence) than another by pointing to another example of someone getting more power than another (here, something stronger than influence, true, but of course analogies are not exactly the same in their specifics).

                  2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

                    Given the fact that you'd probably argue yourself into voting against yourself, no.

                    1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                      Fancy law-talking guys with their persnickety fancy law talk!

      3. GILMORE   10 years ago

        I can see people being idiots

        Because specious arguments can be appealing.

        The relative size of a company, for instance, says nothing about its relative performance for investors, and consequently the board's decisions on how to reward/remunerate leadership.

        You could also think idiotic things like "inequality leads to instability"; even though nations like Somalia and Haiti have far greater "equality" of the general population compared to the United States.

        You could also note that "money is tied to important things in life, including necessities", all the while glossing over the fact that the 'poorest' members of our very-unequal society maintain living standards far above that of billions of people worldwide; and that we're the only nation on earth whose 'poorest' tend to suffer from Obesity.

        Indeed = stupidity and ignorance is probably far more significant than "envy"

        1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

          ""inequality leads to instability"; even though nations like Somalia and Haiti have far greater "equality" of the general population compared to the United States."

          Of course it's not going to be the only thing leading to instability, poverty can as well.

          "all the while glossing over the fact that the 'poorest' members of our very-unequal society maintain living standards far above that of billions of people worldwide"

          You think people should focus on actual poverty and not inequality. That's nice, but it doesn't address my point much, since it's not limited to necessities, right?

          1. GILMORE   10 years ago

            I can also see people being dishonest.

            Dishonesty AND stupidity are probably more significant than envy.

            1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

              People who disagree with you are dishonest and stupid, we get it Gilmore.

              1. GILMORE   10 years ago

                No, mostly just you

    3. Irish   10 years ago

      Because the skills involved in running one of the biggest corporations on Earth are no different than the skills needed to flip burgers, therefore it's wrong for him to make lots more money.

      Supply and demand, the fuck is that?

      1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

        The choosing of CEO's might not be all supply and demand. For one thing, there's the problem of Boards and management knowing each other and putting each other in power for reasons that aren't always connected to performance.

        1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          Just keep telling yourself that Bo, that the dice are all loaded against you. That way when you fail in life you'll have a pre-arranged excuse.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

            You're drawing a much broader conclusion from what I said than I did.

            1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

              He's just trying to soften the landing for you, dear.

  13. John Titor   10 years ago

    So when does Welch's holiday themed album come out and how many Kmele cameos will there be?

    1. Sevo   10 years ago

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlVaqBZpHaU

  14. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) seems to believe that jobs created by Keystone XL pipeline are less important to the economy than other jobs because they will be located in "a limited and red part of the country."

    "Give me a break!" Schumer said.

    Schumer's speech on Tuesday included other head-scratchers besides downplaying people finding work in red states.

    Schumer also said despite the midterm results that deep down, the "public knows in its gut" that bigger government is the "only way" for the middle class to prosper. Revealing a strategy for Democrats in 2016, Schumer said "they must embrace" big government to win.

    http://freebeacon.com/politics.....ed-states/

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

      Schumer's trying to spin his failure as one of the Party's leadership

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        "Schumer also said despite the midterm results that deep down, the "public knows in its gut" that bigger government is the "only way"

        How is this not, or at least a call to, socialism?

        1. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

          How is this not, or at least a call to, socialism?

          It is. But don't expect them to ever call it that.

        2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

          You act like to him that's a bug or something.

    2. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

      He's actually doubling down.

      This is scary because this is the kind of thing that could get Elizabeth Warren traction. I've heard that a large chunk of the Democratic party is not on board with a turn to the left however. Thank God.

  15. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    You could think inequality leads to instability. You could think that since money is tied to important things in life, including necessities, that there are problems with inequality. To the extent money is power there's that too.

    You could think your girlfriend won't get pregnant if she gets out of bed after sex and hops on one foot one hundred times, too.

    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

      I could see that.

    2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

      I'd argue that the really wishful thinking is not recognizing how inequality makes at least a significant amount of people upset, and sometimes upset enough to do some pretty bad things.

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        'Rape Culture' makes a significant number of people upset.

        'GMOs' make a significant number of people upset.

        That some people have different metaphysical assumptions make a significant number of people upset.

        That people get upset about things is no indication of whether that thing is actually 'real'

        See above my point above about 'Stupidity, Ignorance, and Dishonesty'

        1. John Titor   10 years ago

          Dammit Gilmore, take people's immediate emotional response to things more seriously!

        2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

          You're not getting my point.

          The women in Salem were not really casting supernatural spells, you know? But that fact didn't stop them from swinging from nooses.

          1. John Titor   10 years ago

            In this example are you the one saying that they're not really witches but we should humour the people saying so with trials because it's something important to them?

            1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

              I'm not saying to humor them, but that it's silly not to recognize it as a force that can negatively impact us, so that someone could be a libertarian who doesn't think inequality is itself a problem, but, knowing human and social nature, might think too much inequality is a problem because other people will think it is and be spurred to some unpleasant actions.

              1. John Titor   10 years ago

                If that's the case, inequality still isn't the problem, those 'unpleasant actions' are. You're basically arguing that you should to be held hostage ideologically by some nebulous threat.

                1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                  If the inequality over and over leads to the unpleasant actions then it might be something to be concerned about itself, and that's my only point (I was answering the idea that the only concern over inequality must be envy).

                2. John Titor   10 years ago

                  And honestly I'd never expected you to go for populist arguments Bo. Lots of people disagree with open borders immigration, and historically, irrational claims about immigrants has resulted in terrible things. Shouldn't you be considering the unpleasant actions that could occur due to support of open borders, rather than being purely ideologically driven on that issue?

                  1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                    Again, I'm not saying the populist argument is right, or that we should even pander to it, just that the fact that people will often think X in the face of Y and that thinking X often leads to bad result Z can mean you can rightly be concerned about Y (but only because it seems to trigger X and then Z).

                    1. John Titor   10 years ago

                      Except that 'being rightly concerned about Y' because people feel that way is absolutely pandering to that position. It's deliberately taking a statement you believe is incorrect and giving in virtue merely because someone demands it important.

                    2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                      It's not pandering at all, it's a realization of reality. Imagine a politician saying 'there is nothing inherently wrong with inequality, but sadly too much inequality does naturally spark in many people's breast a feeling of outrage that often leads to some pretty awful things, so we should probably at the least try to keep that from happening.' Perhaps all he will want to do is soften the perception it's happening among certain people, for example.

                    3. John Titor   10 years ago

                      And once again, that is absolutely pandering to their perceptions. It is deliberately validating their viewpoint by suggesting that it is damaging to a society, albeit for different reasons. That would not result in any change to the perceptions of the 'stupid people', it would entrench their position by giving them further justification for their position.

              2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

                No, in that case people being stupid or dishonest is the problem, not the inequality.

                1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                  Slaps forehead

            2. GILMORE   10 years ago

              Pandering to ignorance is superior to actually dispelling it, according to Bo

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                You can see Gilmore bravely lecturing the hangman about how believing in witchraft and punishing it is a stupid thing. Because he would never pander. He's like Rorschach in that way (and others I imagine).

                1. GILMORE   10 years ago

                  No i just think everything you've said about a basic macroeconomic detail like relative 'inequality' ...

                  - something which says nothing about *absolute conditions*, like say 'purchasing power', or living standards -

                  ... is complete horseshit, and I enjoy watching you sink deeper into the muck as you try to analogize your way out of increasingly stupid positions.

                  1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                    YOU think people should really care about absolute conditions, not relative ones. Good for you Gilmore. But lot's of people who aren't you care about relative ones. Whether I agree with them or not I'm not going to stick my head under the ground, or shout to them 'but you care about the wrong thing!' when I get caught in their riots.

                    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

                      good for you

      2. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

        I'd argue that the really wishful thinking is not recognizing how inequality makes at least a significant amount of people upset, and sometimes upset enough to do some pretty bad things.

        The cause is not inequity then. The cause is irrationality.

        1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

          What's really irrational is not to understand that people are often irrational about things.

          1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

            So what? A lot of people being stupid doesn't make them right.

            1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

              I didn't say they were right. I said we'd be fools to act like people are not going to be stupid in this way quite often.

              1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

                So what? Stupid people are stupid. As ever, you've been argued into the banal.

                1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                  Stupid people are, like the poor, always going to be with us, and to the extent we ignore that we are being stupid. So I repeat, it seems to me that someone could be concerned about inequality not out of envy, in fact they don't see a problem with inequality in that way at all, but they might still think it's a 'bad thing' because they think many people will think it is a bad thing and do some really hurtful things because of it.

                  1. Sevo   10 years ago

                    Shorter Bo:
                    'We need to pay protection money to keep from getting robbed!'

                    Buzz off.

                    1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

                      I of course said exactly the opposite above in reply to Irish, but go ahead and be silly.

                    2. Sevo   10 years ago

                      Bo Cara Esq.|11.26.14 @ 9:13PM|#
                      "I of course said exactly the opposite above in reply to Irish"

                      And then:
                      "but they might still think it's a 'bad thing' because they think many people will think it is a bad thing and do some really hurtful things because of it."

                      So we shouldn't pay protection money but we should, what?
                      Go ahead; the weasel-dance is amusing...

                  2. John Titor   10 years ago

                    So wait, stupid people and the poor will always be around? I don't think you're seeing the actual conclusion of your argument: that is, that those 'hurtful things' are inevitable if these people always exist and there will always be perceived inequality. No amount of recognizing their beliefs as somewhat valid, or even half-halfheartedly supporting their policy preferences will work. Since there will always been a perception of inequality and stupid people to see it in an irrational way, there is no way to prevent the 'really hurtful things' from occurring.

                    If that's the case, then people who think it's a 'bad thing' for the reasons you list is just as irrational, because they're fighting some inevitable shift of history.

      3. VG Zaytsev   10 years ago

        I'd argue that the really wishful thinking is not recognizing how inequality makes at least a significant amount of people upset, and sometimes upset enough to do some pretty bad things.

        It's not the inequality per se, it's the harranging of agitators that leads to anti-social behavior. As noted upthread, the inequality in compensation for the employees of sport franchises' is much greater than exists elsewhere.

        Hasn't led to rioting or whatever, though.

  16. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    not recognizing how inequality makes at least a significant amount of people upset, and sometimes upset enough to do some pretty bad things.

    You're an Appeasement of the Mob sort of libertarian, then; is that an offshoot of Precautionary Principle libertarianism?

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

      Recognizing the potential of a mob and appeasing it are two different things.

    2. John Quincy Addingmachine   10 years ago

      He doesn't want to appear intragnizent.

  17. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    INDEPENDENTS DEFROST YOUR TURKEYS!

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Not nice to talk about Tony and Palin and the rest of the progs that way.

      1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

        When is the Canuckistani Thanksgiving?

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          October.

  18. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5f0mVn0HH6U#t=29

    He'll SCARE YOU INTO HOPE AND CHANGE.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Prediction: I got shit to do.

  20. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

    Peaceful Protest: They were doing it wrong.

  21. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    My hotel doesn't have fox. Can somebody live blog?

    1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

      Kennedy is getting naked.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Typing with one hand?

        1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

          My left hand, at that.

    2. JeremyR   10 years ago

      Kennedy interrupts someone

      Over and over.

    3. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

      Now she's sliding across the table towards Dagan.

    4. Sevo   10 years ago

      What's that THING coming our from under the desk?!
      Oh, NO! It's arrrrrrrrrrrrghwwwwwww..........

    5. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

      Kennedy and Dagan are locked in a sapphic embrace.

  22. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

    hotter than the inside of my mama's turkey

    Euphemism received.

  23. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    Kmele and the other guy were about ready to throw down!

  24. GILMORE   10 years ago

    The Independents Attire Review, 26 November 2014

    Misinformed-Edition

    - Kennedy: The Stepford Wives was about Robot Women, right? (*i never saw it/read it/or the remake) This shade of blue has a blood-draining effect that makes her blemishless-pale skin seem Androidish. The light-pink lipstick doesn't help. We remain weak on the blue shades outside of her navy stuff.

    - Matt: Last Thursday's striped shirt makes a repeat appearance; we like it, especially with a solid-color tie. Anything patterned would be headache inducing. This slight variation from Matt's standard point-collar white/blue shirts is far more enlivening than you'd initially expect. We'd like to see more like this, as well as some more collar variation (as we usually beg)

    - Kmele: Joy of joys; our favorite tweed jacket is paired with one of his seasonal-shade ties. Its so dope it *hurts*. That he wears this kind of getup with such ease and comfort makes it all the more impressive. He could probably even get away with wearing a hat. Effortless Victory.

    Komapsumnida

    1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

      Wait a sec, is Matt on tonight?

  25. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Wow. No Fist and this thread falls apart.

    GILMORE, where is our attire critique?

    1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

      Oops.

    2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

      Refresh... How does it work?

      1. Sevo   10 years ago

        Sometimes, not very well at all.

      2. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

        Well, you right click on the page and then left click on "reload" and new shit magically appears on the screen.

  26. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Holy shit! Kelly Clarkson blew up nicely.

  27. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    On Rand and war...

    Take it away from executive fiat. A big fuck you to the emperor.

  28. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Actually, I thought the declaration was a whole lot more restrictive than the AUMFs. Had a fucking end date.

  29. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    Why can't Rand have it both ways? BO has said one thing and been George Bush.

  30. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

    Kennedy, you expect too much from the Stoopid Party.

  31. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Are they his kids?

    1. JeremyR   10 years ago

      They seem to be Michelle's anyway.

      Poor girls.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        "If you want my political machine to help your eventual Senate candidacies, you *will* stand next to me and give me moral support while I pardon the turkey!"

    2. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

      I can't believe how big they are. Has that asshole really been in office that long?

  32. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Kmele comments on the current business environment

  33. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Bourbon!

  34. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    Let's see, Turkeys and Illegal Immigrants? Why not?

    US Citizens? Meh.

  35. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    I presume Kennedy knows that the Advent season has already begun according to the Orthodox calendar:

    http://www.theologic.com/oflweb/xmas/advcal.htm

  36. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    My guess... EPA.

  37. JeremyR   10 years ago

    Did a school educational film about precision screws start showing?

    Who is the audience for this show that a commercial like that would show (for about 3 minutes, too)

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      I know all about precision screws.

  38. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Prediction = EPA wins enemy of freedom.

    The press conference they had recently was nauseating in how blithely the director claimed "we HELP businesses; we've never hurt anyone's business"... or something to that effect.

  39. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Kmele! Off the top rope. Again!

    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

      "Kmele 'Superfly' Foster"

  40. GILMORE   10 years ago

    You can see Matt trying to prevent himself from breaking down and crying @ the word 'Bodies'

  41. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    This fella is a fucking worm.

  42. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    No hindsight. From the ONSET Americans didn't want it.

    But they didn't have good enough insurance to begin with.

  43. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    There you go.

    Single payer.

    Limbaugh was right. It's what they wanted all along.

    1. John Titor   10 years ago

      But Rufus, our healthcare is great! What could possibly go wrong?

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        IT'S THE BEST.

        Okay, maybe not, but at least we're not like those uncaring Americans!

        /nationalist derp.

        1. John Titor   10 years ago

          ...Said as someone desperately crosses the border for medical tourism.

  44. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

    I know when to shut up

    Kennedy, watch and learn.

  45. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Okay Playa. Dagan is talking about her sexual fantasies.

    Really!

  46. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    THat is perfect, Kennedy actually stopped for a second.

  47. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    This year, the Welch's will be quoting Cosby while naked.

  48. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    I'd give her time and a half.

    1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

      Double time.

    2. GILMORE   10 years ago

      And leave it on the dresser

  49. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    A CEO of the Bank of Montreal in past once worked in the mail room and worked his way up.

  50. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    Cato is counterintuitive enough that it's probably the answer.

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Well, I guess I'm technically right.

  51. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Playa, now Kennedy is saying she loves another chick.

    Really!

  52. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    He framed OJ.

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      He killed himself when Julius Caesar triumphed.

  53. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

    Ah, not Lou Dobbs.

    (For Fist)

    1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      Someone had to.

  54. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    Not DAHBS!

  55. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Snow is the 'enemy of their freedom'?

    Left coasters. Back to Cali with you!!

    yeah i don't think so

    NOT DOBBS!

  56. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

    Have a good Turkey Day (for those of you so inclined)!

  57. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    Damn, I should have joked about Obama's turkey pardon: "If you like your turkey you can keep your turkey."

    1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

      If you like your turkey you can keep eat your turkey.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        "Remember when I said I would cook and eat you last?

        "I lied."

        1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

          "Mr. President, can we visit the farm where all the pardoned turkeys live?"

          "No, they're too busy, but I think I can say that there's a little of those turkeys in all of us."

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

            "Are the pardoned turkeys fed well?"

            "Of course! They're stuffed!"

            1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

              "OK, turkeys, time to wash up, please proceed to the room marked 'baths.' Ignore the gravy smell."

              1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

                Wow, that got dark quickly.

              2. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

                I lol'ed:)

  58. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    No guacamole contest? Eff that.

  59. Knarf Yenrab!   10 years ago

    I can say, without hesitation, that this is the best and most memorable example of Matt "I supported John Kerry" Welch's singing voice and skills as a guitarist. That song had at least five chords with maybe even a bar chord thrown in there.

    He is redeemed by his excellent backup singers in the last few seconds of the video.

  60. leilafairfieldbum   10 years ago

    My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My neighbour's sister has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
    =============================
    try this site ? ? ? ? ? http://www.jobsfish.com
    =============================
    GO TO THE SITE TEC NEXT TAB FOR MORE INFO AND HELP

  61. HazelMeade   10 years ago

    Isn't Rand Paul charmingly retrograde with his quixotic efforts to actually declare war on people we want to bomb and shoot at?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Judge Orders Tufts Grad Student Rumeysa Ozturk Be Released on Bail From Immigration Detention

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.9.2025 3:17 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!