Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

New Digital Drug Market Promises Better Service Than Silk Road

Matthew Feeney | 6.28.2013 2:18 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | United States Fish and Wildlife Service/wikimedia
(United States Fish and Wildlife Service/wikimedia)

Below is a promotional video from Atlantis, which describes itself as "the world's best anonymous online drug marketplace."

Check out Atlantis' twitter and facebook pages here and here.

Unsurprisingly, Atlantis accepts Bitcoins and Litecoins. For those familiar with Bitcoins Atlantis may sound similar to the website Silk Road. The CEO of Atlantis did an AMA on Reddit where he/she explained (among other things) why he/she thinks Atlantis is better than Silk Road.

Like Silk Road, to use Atlantis you will need to download the Tor browser bundle, which will allow you to browse the internet anonymously. Nick Gillespie recently sat down with Tor's development director to discuss how Tor works, how it started, and more.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: NSA Chief Claims Massive E-Mail Collection Program Was Nixed Over Privacy Concerns

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

PoliticsPolicyWar on DrugsDrug PolicyInternetRegulationSurveillanceDrugs
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (44)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

    I showed this video to a coworker of mine the other day, which led to me having to explain to them how TOR works.

    Sadly, instead of being excited, they were freaked out.

    1. Duke   12 years ago

      Do they also freak out when they learn it's a federal crime to read other people's mail? Or when they close their bedroom blinds so others can't see in their room at night?

      1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

        Closing the blinds is a crime? That's new to me.

        1. Duke   12 years ago

          Supposed to be an analogy of how people expect privacy in various places but don't expect it on the net.

    2. generic Brand   12 years ago

      How does it work? I can't watch the video right now, but I am very curious. I often use the Chrome "incognito" windows. Is it similar to that or entirely different?

    3. generic Brand   12 years ago

      How does it work? I can't watch the video right now, but I am very curious. I often use the Chrome "incognito" windows. Is it similar to that or entirely different?

      1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

        entirely different. Routes encrypted packets across randomly assigned nodes.

      2. wheelock   12 years ago

        As Tim explained it routes your encrypted request across a randomly selected group of nodes. Each node only knows where to forward it to next. This makes it next to impossible for "interested parties" to see what you are looking at or talking to. Its pretty great. Its very slow compared to regular browsing and many services wont work (anything with flash, most major email providers, etc)

  2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A dot onion address? I smell a rat.

    1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

      How so? That's what all the addresses are on the TOR network.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        THEN I SMELL A NETWORK WIDE RAT.

        1. Eitan   12 years ago

          I smell a technically illiterate person.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

            Technically illiterate is the best kind of illiterate.

  3. Episiarch   12 years ago

    What do I need this for? I'm sure that when the State Liquor Board finally gets around to deciding how weed can be sold, it'll be reasonable and sensible and not retarded at all.

    1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

      You may not, but those of us in the other 48 states could use it.

    2. Zeb   12 years ago

      Not for weed. But it could be good for some more exotic things.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        Guys, guys, I was making a joke about how I think the WA State Liquor Board is going to fuck up regulation and licensing. Of course this would be useful for things other than weed.

        You're all just a bunch of degenerates.

        1. Guy Laguy   12 years ago

          u would know!

        2. Dagny T.   12 years ago

          They can fuck up regulation all they want. Unless they find a way to stop people from growing, and "sharing" with their "friends," everyone is going to keep getting their weed exactly the way they do now. I hope their revenues from any retarded weed-tax are fucking microscopic.
          State-sold weed will be handy for tourists who don't have a local connection, but that's about it, I think.

          1. Episiarch   12 years ago

            We'll see. At least they haven't been being incredibly retarded so far like Colorado has. It's been a complete non-issue. "Oh, weed is legal now, that's almost entirely like before, carry on."

            1. Dagny T.   12 years ago

              Right. Ideal, pie-in-the-sky scenario would be the state does such a colossally terrible job of selling it, that they just say "fuck it, privatize." For now, the relative improvement in freedom is nice, but when that finally happens, the economic boom and flood of innovation and entrepreneurship in WA will be insane. WA economy has a lot going for it already; that would send it into the stratosphere.

              1. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

                I am getting the perception that WA is one of the better blue states, even outside of strengths like gun laws and mj.

          2. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

            Well, home grow is still illegal in WA. It's just that possessing that cannabis after the fact (in small enough quantities) is legal.

            1. Dagny T.   12 years ago

              Tim, do you have any idea how flaunted that law is? Tons of people home-grow and there's very little risk exposure for doing so. Now I am sure (and have some limited anecdotal evidence to support) that many people were home-growing before legalization. But it's insane how widespread it seems now.

              1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

                The beautiful thing about well done home grow is that you will never be caught...unless you tell someone.

                Most of those people were likely already growing.

        3. Loki   12 years ago

          You're all just a bunch of degenerates.

          We are? What about that I found you naked with that bowl of Jell-O?

          1. Loki   12 years ago

            *time I found...

            Fuck, I hate it when I screw up a movie reference. *hangs head in shame*

  4. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

    I will never use this, but I'm really glad it's there. Kinda like New Hampshire.

    1. Dagny T.   12 years ago

      Not really wanting to click through, do we know if it's for recreational drugs only, or Rx too? It would be pretty neat to be able to get prescription drugs without having to go through the medical cartel.

      In general, I am kind of hoping for a whole shadow medical industry to emerge out of the rubbble of OCare.

      1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

        I would imagine it would also include prescription drugs that can also be used recrationally. I'm pretty sure a person could purchase Oxy's and Adderall.

  5. SIV   12 years ago

    If I was crazy and recklees enough to buy drugs through one of these services I'd only use Silk Road.

    1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

      I understand...I cannot tell you how much poppy I saw going through the Tagab in Kapisa or the Ring Road through Charikar...oh, wait...you meant online.

    2. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

      What about Silk Road makes it preferable?

      1. Warren   12 years ago

        Atlantis is a slicker site, but it's not as organized, and does far far less business. This means, for now at least, sellers reputations are based on only a handful of feedback. Even worse, the particular product you're interested in may have no reviews at all.

        The 1%-2% savings doesn't justify the vaster selection and far greater confidence you get from the Silk Road.

  6. kinnath   12 years ago

    So, dear technical friends, is TOR traffic recognizable as TOR traffic to someone sniffing the line at an ISP? And can that traffic be traced to a source?

    So the issue is whether or not being a TOR user will make you a target of surveillance.

    1. Eitan   12 years ago

      TOR traffic cannot be traced to the source, that's the point. As for being recognizable, it's not really. But I suppose if you're using a website that requires a user account and the IP address they log appears to be changing and come from different countries all over the world, then someone might recognize you're using TOR. TOR can't keep you anonymous when you give away your name. That's why websites like Silk Road encourage users to also use PGP encryption when giving their address to vendors.

      1. kinnath   12 years ago

        Thanks.

  7. affenkopf   12 years ago

    Youtube videos? Facebook and Twitter accounts?

    I think I'll stay with Silk Road. This smells like a trap.

    1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

      It would be more of a trap for the sellers than for the buyers.

      1. Citizen Nothing   12 years ago

        A lot of trouble to set such an elaborate trap that could only work once.

        1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

          Also, I'm not sure they'd err be able to track the sellers.

    2. Eitan   12 years ago

      Silk Road has an excellent record, professional design, tons of sophisticated features, a huge community and a decent brand. Reason should really try to get an interview with the Dread Pirate Roberts (the proprietor of Silk Road). He's an avid anarcho-capitalist. He even started a book club on their forum devoted to libertarian philosophy.

  8. Floridian   12 years ago

    I've never used drugs but it makes me smile to think there is competition in circumventing the government. This will likely become more useful over the years as more and more things get banned.

    1. affenkopf   12 years ago

      Agorist counter-economics in action.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!