Obama Administration Will Review Clarence Aaron's Commutation Petition and the Clemency Process


ProPublica's Dafna Linzer reports that the White House has asked the Justice Department to review the commutation petition of Clarence Aaron, a 43-year-old who is serving multiple life sentences for helping connect a cocaine dealer with a supplier in the early 1990s, when he was Louisiana college student with a clean record. The case received renewed attention after Linzer revealed that President George W. Bush probably would have freed Aaron if the pardon attorney, Ronald L. Rodgers, had fully disclosed several relevant facts, including support for commutation from the judge who sentenced Aaron and the U.S. attorney for the district in which he was tried. In addition to reconsidering Aaron's petition, Linzer says, the Obama administration is commissioning a review of its clemency process that will ask, among other things, whether it is racially biased. An analysis by Linzer and Jennifer LaFleur found that "white applicants were four times more likely to receive presidential mercy than minorities."

According to two unnamed "government officials," the Justice Department is looking to replace Rodgers, which seems appropriate given his role in the Aaron case but would not address the fundamental dysfunction of the pardon attorney's office, where backlogs, cursory reviews, and a strong bias against granting petitions combine to prevent the proper exercise of the president's clemency powers. When he was White House counsel, Gregory Craig pushed the idea of establishing an independent board to evaluate clemency petitions, removing the function from the Justice Department. Although Craig is gone, Linzer says, that proposal still has advocates within the administration, including Deputy White House Counsel Caroline Cheng; Tonya Robinson, who advises Obama on justice issues; and Brian Levine, Vice President Joe Biden's domestic policy adviser. 

In addition to dangling the possibility of reform, Linzer's sources suggest that Obama, who has commuted exactly one sentence so far while rejecting thousands of petitions, will finally use his clemency power in a serious way after the election in November. "There will be 76 days between the election and inauguration for the president to exercise his power," said one anonymous official. If Obama is re-elected, will he feel free to remedy the draconian sentences he used to condemn, or will he still worry about spending political capital on the issue, thereby jeopardizing other items on his agenda? Rather than implausibly hope that Obama the drug warrior will become Obama the reformer in a second term, perhaps those of us who are interested in ameliorating the injustice caused by the war on drugs should hope he loses the election, in which case he might use his last few months in office to accomplish some good.

NEXT: David Harsanyi on Whether President Obama's Ideas Are Un-American

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Obama is re-elected, will he feel free to remedy the draconian sentences he used to condemn, or will he still worry about spending political capital on the issue, thereby jeopardizing other items on his agenda?

    Or will he just be a scumbag politician and reject all clemency out of spite?

    Seriously, the excuse making for Obama by Reason writers has got to stop. I'd think I'm at TPM Cafe.

  2. If only we could ever get a black man elected President, guys like Aaron would get a fair shot.

  3. It may actually be a good sign that they're scapegoating the Pardon Attorney - as if the President wants to distance himself from his record in preparation for a change of direction.

    "Those evil boyars deceived me, the Czar, about the problems in the justice system. Imagine how shocked I was to discover how much my evil advisor misled me!"

    1. In reality, the output he's getting from the Pardon Attorney reflects the President's own priorities - his priority is not to grant some pardon or commutation which can embarrass him politically, and releasing a convicted drug dealer would come under that category. So the Pardon Attorney is doing what he's supposed to do - recommending against clemency except where the guy has already served his sentence and showed enough evidence of reform to be worth the risk of pardoning.

      1. Now he's going to the counternarrative of a Racist Justice System, and while admitting that the worst human characteristics - racism included - affect the justice system, there's no way we can blame racism for *all* of the dysfunction. But politically, maybe he thinks the racism narrative is the only way to counter the "soft on crime" narrative, so we're in for some high-level Sharptonization.

  4. Considering that the campaign is trying to plant stories that the administration is going to start doing the right thing after the election without actually committing to doing so, I'm sceptical. He still has as head of the DEA a woman who considers dead Mexican's as a sign of success in the WOD and called them "caged animals killing each other". He should have fired her on the spot for that, but he didn't.
    Considering how badly he failed to come through on any libertarian hopes, I'm convinced he will do nothing but disappoint.

    1. That Obama has been worse than Bush is what keeps me very skeptical. Keeping the status quo could be more easily explained away as political cowardice, but not ramping the war up.

  5. After 2 decades in prison, there will never be true justice for Clarence Aaron. A good start might be throwing the pardon attorney behind bars and feeding him a daily allotment of cock-meat sandwiches.

  6. lol hes black so I am sure he will get it.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.