Psychology/Psychiatry

Cliff Kincaid's Reefer Madness

|

FrumForum contributor Ron Hill, a New Orleans psychologist, rebuts David Frum's argument that pot should remain illegal because it may adversely affect schizophrenics who may end up killing people:

To suggest that marijuana should remain illegal because its use is contraindicated in some part of the population makes as much sense as arguing that alcohol should be illegal because its use is sometimes contraindicated as well. This is particularly true since deaths from marijuana are almost unheard of, yet alcohol misuse is directly blamed in the deaths of 79,646 Americans between 2001 and 2005, according to the CDC. I have also known bipolar patients to misuse caffeine and tobacco in an effort to bring on a manic state, at which point they may become a danger to themselves or others. Should tobacco and caffeine fall under tighter regulation also? Where does it end?

Keeping marijuana banned or toughening penalties for its use is not the solution for isolated acts of violence by alleged schizophrenics….

I'm a conservative because I believe government should use its powers only when necessary and only to the extent necessary to accomplish the limited responsibilities of the Federal government. My belief is the war on marijuana undermines one of the fundamental goals of conservatism: reducing the size and scope of the federal government.

Frum is wise to be concerned about the effects of marijuana and other mood altering drugs. I don't use or promote their use, but I'm also concerned about the drug wars influence on government spending and power. I just think there are other ways to deal with marijuana that would better minimize the problems associated with it without giving government more resources and greater powers to involve itself in the lives of its citizens.

Meanwhile, the reliably over-the-top "journalist and media critic" Cliff Kincaid, who suffers from a different sort of reefer madness, latches onto Frum's argument to support his own fantasy about a "Soros-funded marijuana lobby" that is "working overtime to try to draw media attention away from [Jared Lee Loughner's] addiction to the drug." His evidence: a single post on the subject by the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), which does not receive any funding from George Soros. NORML's executive director, Allen St. Pierre, says "the organization has not taken a single call from the media re any connection [between] cannabis and the Arizona shooting." Kincaid, director of the Center for Investigative Journalism at Accuracy in Media (no—really), also claims NORML "attacked" Loughner's main target, the gravely wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), two years ago. Judge for yourself.

Kincaid wants to talk about the connection between marijuana and schizophrenia—the incidence of which, as Maia Szalavitz notes in Time, remained stubbornly static even "while marijuana went from being a secret shared by a small community of hepcats and beatniks in the 1940s and '50s to a rite of passage for some 70% of youth by the turn of the century." But first he wants to make sure we know that "Weather Underground terrorist Bernardine Dohrn…declared marijuana and other mind-altering drugs to be weapons in the revolution" and that "Playboy founder Hugh Hefner was the early funder of the marijuana legalization movement."

Having noted the clear link between pot and revolutions both political and sexual, Kincaid says he can tell just by looking at a picture of Loughner—a tittering, red-faced pinko who "hated religion, listened to acid rock, and posted a link to an American flag-burning video"—that marijuana was at the root of his homicidal impulses: "A photograph of a smirking Jared Loughner, after he was taken into custody, seems to prove beyond doubt that he is seriously disturbed, as a result of prolonged drug use." Still don't buy it? To clinch his case, Kincaid cites an online comment from a pseudonymous reader of the St. Paul Pioneer Press who says "everyone who promotes marijuana as a good thing has blood on their hands." And you thought Kincaid was just making shit up.

[Thanks to NORML's Paul Armentano for the FrumForum tip.]

NEXT: Another Isolated Incident

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. IIRC, some people who knew Loughner said that he got worse after quitting pot. But no anecdotes or statistics or logic will dissuade assholes like Kincaid. They have made up their minds that their moral preferences should be laws enforced by guns, and that’s that.

    While not as directly culpable as someone like Loughner, the deadly roll call reported by Radley Balko day after day is the blood on their hands. And it’s real, unlike the fiction inside Kincaid’s mind.

  2. Kincaid says he can tell just by looking at a picture of Loughner?a tittering, red-faced pinko who “hated religion, listened to acid rock, and posted a link to an American flag-burning video”

    The “listened to acid rock” made me seriously LOL. I haven’t heard that term uttered since 1983, and it was from my grandpa, bitching about a Ted Nugent video he glimpsed on MTV while channel surfing.

    1. “Come on motherfucker, turn that cocksucker up!”
      Great White Buffalo

      1. I know it’s cool to bag on The Nuge, but goddamn he’s a great guitarist and Tooth, Fang & Claw is a classic album. “Sasha” is the weak song on it.

      2. Some more germane “acid rock” from Uncle Ted.

        1. Awesome – haven’t seen this! Went straight to facebook, “Ted’s contribution to this week’s focus on peace, love and understanding.”

          WANGO ZEE TANGO!

    2. I seriously had to google the term “acid rock,” and I’m one of those music nerds who can spend fifteen minutes lecturing my wife about the difference between first, second and third-wave ska (despite the fact that I only a handful of ska cd’s).

      1. OWN. Only OWN a handful of ska cd’s. I’m not letting you guys fill in the blanks for me, especially when the term “handful” is involved.

  3. It took me a minute to figure out whether “Accuracy in the Media” is staffed by conservative retards or liberal retards.

    1. Just assume it’s staffed with statist retards; you can never wrong.

  4. Kincaid says he can tell just by looking at a picture of Loughner … that marijuana was at the root of his homicidal impulses

    I can tell just by looking at a picture of Kincaid what is at the “root” of his.

    1. i have a big loot

  5. Kincaid thinks that being libertarian is just a cover for smoking pot and having gay sex. With that keen understanding of reality, who gives a flying shit what he thinks?

    1. Damn, so what Kincaid said isn’t true?

      Hmm, I was told that when I became a libertarian, I’d get to see lots of sexy lesbian action, inexpensive guns, and plenty of cheap dope.

      What a bait and switch, man…

      1. Sorry, not part of the package. You didn’t get the deluxe set-up.

  6. Man, it’s just been raining stupid for like 2 weeks now…

  7. Henceforth, this line of thought shall be named the Bud Libel

    1. I thought Bud Libel is when AB-InBev asserts that Bud Select is “full flavor.”

  8. This is nothing more than propoganda made up by the gov.I find it very hard to believe that it will cause any harm to spcho’s at all.It’s medicinal benefits as well as it being made legal across the board for all to use is actually very logical and it does make sense.I take maorphine,loratab10’s tranqs,sedaTGIVES ETCC FOR ptsd CHRONIC PAIN,FLASHBACKS PANIC ATTACKS,ANXIETY ATTACKS,NIGHNMARES and I have found that marijuana does more for me than any and all of these medicines do without any after effects and no damage to the liver and kidneys as well.As far as being addicitve,marijuana is not a physically addictive drug,merely mentally.I”v used it snese I was 14 and I’m 59 now and for me to not use it is not a problem at all,so that pretty much blows the physically addictive line out of the water

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.