Reason Writers on the Tube: Nick Gillespie on Congressional Conflicts of Interest & Transparency on CNBC's Power Lunch
Reason's Nick Gillespie appeared on CNBC's Power Lunch to discuss Congressional conflicts of interest and whether politicians should be allowed to invest in industries they regulate on June 16, 2010.
Approximately 4.23 minutes.
Subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube Channel and receive automatic notifications when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Video link broken for me.
I can sum it up for you: The guests spoke past and over one another for 2 minutes while the hosts contributed nothing meaningful.
I didn't actually watch. I'm just guessing.
Also, by the end, everyone agreed with Gillespie.
(Not a guess. They actually did.)
I watched. My only complaint is that there weren't more distracting graphics and sound effects. They could have easily fitted the weather forecast in there, and maybe some sports scores.
I don't know, I think there weren't enough guests, and it was too long.
And, they let individual panelists drone on for upwards of 20 seconds a pop. There was a very real danger of them finishing their points.
Sheesh, what a bunch of gripers! We only have 24 hours of programming, people. This ain't C-SPAN. Americans' attention spans are...um...
Did they have the cameraman lunging to and fro while taking a picture of some guy's still photo on a monitor?
I LOVE when they do that. And those "whooshy" noises; awesome.
Agreed. They also missed an opportunity to read some crackpot viewer emails: "rxbfq489 from Milwaukee writes, 'but if ur congrsmn was transprnt, how wd we see m?'"
tyler matheson sucks
CNBC made a tactical error by placing The Jacket next to the stock market ticker when the Dow was up. Now people will associate libertarians with economic prosperity.
Yeah, better go steal some old people's social security checks to remind people to hate us.
Nick can travel to the future.
Skillz.