SCOTUS Seems Inclined To Reject Hawaii's Default Rule Against Guns on Private Property Open to the Public
The state requires carry permit holders to obtain advance permission before bringing firearms into businesses.
The state requires carry permit holders to obtain advance permission before bringing firearms into businesses.
DHS tells officers to use "de-escalation tactics," employ "a verbal warning" instead of force when feasible, and avoid "placing themselves in positions" that trigger the use of deadly force.
A few thoughts on the oral argument in Galette v. N.J. Transit Corp.
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
State lawmakers should be more skeptical of overly broad laws, too.
They are joining the Trump administration in urging the Supreme Court to uphold a federal law that disarms "unlawful" drug consumers.
How J.D. Vance misstated the law.
The crucial question is whether the agent reasonably believed the driver he killed posed a threat, even if she was not actually trying to run him over.
Contrary to widespread speculation, the Court's first opinion of an argued case concerned neither Trump's tariffs nor voting rights.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
Adrian Gonzales is on trial for acts of "omission" that prosecutors say amounted to 29 felony counts of child endangerment.
The chief justice hails the judiciary as “a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.”
The NYT profiles a sloppy and highly problematic empirical study of the Supreme Court.
The ruling, which emphasizes the lack of historical support for such a law, is unlikely to survive en banc review.
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
Despite their general ignorance of constitutional law, bears pose a much less grave threat to your civil liberties than humans do.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
Is unfettered majority rule actually a good idea for the left to embrace?
It is yet another ruling that shields the government from liability for damages caused by law enforcement.
The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure had a rocky 2025.
The department's lawsuit notes that the prohibited firearms are "in common use" for "lawful purposes," meaning they are covered by the Second Amendment.
The justices suggested the president is misinterpreting "the regular forces," a key phrase in the statute on which he is relying.
Oh, so now the Trump administration is worried about the complexity of its tariff polices?
A new study further undermines revisionist claims about birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, noting a dog that did not bark.
The appeals court ruled that administrators violated Stuart Reges' First Amendment rights when they investigated and threatened to punish him for constitutionally protected speech.
A conservative federal judge questions the reach of free speech.
This is Priscilla Villarreal’s second trip to the Supreme Court, which last year revived her First Amendment lawsuit.
From birthright citizenship to tariffs, many of the president’s key policies run counter to the Constitution’s original meaning.
The Supreme Court should take a page from its own history.
The Justice Department's litigation positions are at odds with its avowed intent to protect Second Amendment rights.
Plus: It's the final day of Reason's webathon.
I wrote it (with help from others) on behalf of the Cato Institute and a group of takings and property scholars.
The justices grant certiorari before judgment in one of the two cases challenging the Trump Administration's attempt to narrow birthright citizenship via executive order.
Raich is one of the Court's worst federalism decisions, holding that Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce allows it to ban possession of marijuana that never crossed state lines, and was never sold in any market.
Plus: It’s webathon time.
The Department of Justice sides with Monsanto on whether federal law preempts state-law duty-to-warn suits against pesticide manufacturers, setting up an important test of the Court's view of federal preemption.
The Supreme Court’s power to nullify legislative and executive acts is inherent in the Constitution.
The Trump administration is desperately trying to criminalize a video noting that service members have no obligation to follow unlawful orders.
The president’s reaction to a supposedly "seditious" video illustrates his tendency to portray criticism of him as a crime.
Plus: Jimmy Cliff, RIP.
Could today's summary reversal be a sign of things to come?
Now, under Johnson's leadership, the House has changed its rules to make it even harder for lawmakers to signal their opposition to Trump's tariffs.
Plus: Ken Burns’ The American Revolution is worth your time.
Remembering the legacy of a principled legal activist.
Congress justified that National Firearms Act of 1934 as a revenue measure—a rationale undermined by the repeal of taxes on suppressors and short-barreled rifles.
The right to keep and bear arms occupies a curious place in American legal history.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks