Can the Feds Ban You From Making Liquor in Your Own Home?
A challenge to the federal prohibition on home distilling could give the Supreme Court a chance to rein in Congress’ Commerce Clause power.
A challenge to the federal prohibition on home distilling could give the Supreme Court a chance to rein in Congress’ Commerce Clause power.
The decision ends a yearlong legal war spanning multiple lawsuits, contradictory state and federal court orders, and repeated appeals to the Supreme Court.
Challenging his conviction for illegal gun possession, Curtis Squire argues that the Commerce Clause cannot justify bans on intrastate, noncommercial conduct.
Given the Second Amendment's history, several briefs argue, a gun's suitability for militia service suggests Americans have a right to possess it.
Unwise policies are not always unlawful policies.
The case hinges on the distinction between "unusual" weapons and arms in common use for lawful purposes.
Meanwhile, the top court of Massachusetts considers whether the state can deny carry permits to applicants who are deemed "unsuitable."
Olympus Spa—an all-female, nude establishment in Washington state—sued after the government said it had broken the law by refusing to accept a preoperative transgender woman. But the case is more complicated than it looks.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a pair of cases involving rifle restrictions imposed by Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois.
The chief justice finds himself in dissent in his latest showdown with the president.
By unilaterally razing and replacing the East Wing, the president again shows his disregard for the rule of law and the separation of powers.
Prediction markets can no longer offer sports event contracts in Nevada after the appellate court's decision, giving other states a roadmap for regulating the platforms.
Plus: SCOTUS allows Trump’s White House ballroom construction to proceed.
A SCOTUS petition argues that the practice, which allows a judicial finding of dangerousness based on a preponderance of the evidence, violates the Fifth Amendment.
The conservative justice is sticking around on the Supreme Court. Will conservatives come to regret it?
But the legal fighting will continue in the lower courts.
Plus: A 911 glitch, the disappearance of the menhaden, the deportation of a Navy sailor's dad, and more...
Despite the Supreme Court's best efforts to rein them in, federal regulators continue to abuse their authority under the Clean Water Act.
A major separation-of-church-and-state case lands at the Supreme Court.
The agency’s attempt to intimidate David Streever is at the center of a First Amendment case.
Less than two months after losing at SCOTUS, Trump tries again with more misguided executive orders.
Is it named after the father of geometry or a Cleveland suburb? Both.
In one case after another, the president has tried to cut the courts out of the picture painted by the Framers.
A federal appeals court ruled that Curtis Whateley's anti-police vanity plate was private speech protected by the First Amendment. Virginia says it will seek review from the Supreme Court.
Property rights are no less worthy of protection just because intangible property is at stake.
Appealing to national security is not a "get-out-of-law-free card," a federal court ruled last week.
During the last century, the Commerce Clause has replaced the Taxing Clause as an excuse for federal legislation.
A detailed Marquette Law School poll finds public views of the Court are modestly negative, but most major recent decisions enjoy majority public support.
The two measures combine unconstitutional provisions with performance art.
A new podcast from the National Constitution Center
The “father of the Constitution” worried about federal and state overreach.
The liberal justice wants the Supreme Court’s harshest progressive critics to chill out.
In the upcoming climate change case the Supreme Court should reject the industry and Trump Administration arguments for preemption-by-penumbra.
The judge concluded that a high school student's privacy interests trumped freedom of the press.
The prominent liberal legal scholar and former ACLU leader outlines how the Court has often checked Trump, but also critiques it for going against precedent.
The president's latest round of broad import taxes, like the previous two, treats his statutory authority as an afterthought.
It responds to a creative court-packing proposal put forward by Andy Craig.
In recent remarks before the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference, Justice Kagan rejects the conventional liberal narrative about the Supreme Court.
The FCC chairman thinks the "public interest" standard is a license to interfere with freedom of the press.
What’s at stake in Ream v. U.S. Department of the Treasury.
The death of Humphrey's Executor was foretold, but some of the consequences may not have been anticipated.
The justices said the "open fields" doctrine, a sweeping exception to constitutional privacy protections, does not apply in the Keystone State.
Ken Jouppi's Eighth Amendment challenge asks the Court to decide whether a fine must be proportional to the gravity of the crime.
Plus: a few words about The Odyssey
An old drug conviction could still stop you from waxing eyebrows, cutting hair, or giving massages.
In a decision written by a Joe Biden nominee, the appeals court addresses a long-simmering issue that the Supreme Court will consider during its next term.
Leonard Hoffmann and his neighbors in North Dakota went to court to fight for fair market value—as the Constitution promises—after WBI Energy Transmission said it would take their land at a discount.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.