Trump, an Avowed Second Amendment Champion, Defends a Gun Ban With 'No Historical Justification'
His administration is urging the Supreme Court to uphold a prosecution for violating a federal law that bars illegal drug users from owning firearms.
His administration is urging the Supreme Court to uphold a prosecution for violating a federal law that bars illegal drug users from owning firearms.
That understanding of a familiar anti-Biden slogan hinges on the political message it communicates.
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in November on whether Trump's use of tariffs is constitutional.
My review of Amy Coney Barrett's Listening to the Law.
Long-ago debates about executive authority are not as distant as they might initially seem.
Will the Supreme Court grant Trump the overwhelming judicial deference he demands?
The law applies to millions of Americans who pose no plausible threat to public safety, including cannabis consumers in states that have legalized marijuana.
The correct answer is: Yes, even when they are also regulations. Whether the Court agrees could determine the future of presidential power.
Even with a six-justice conservative majority, the Roberts Court has not (yet) increased the rate at which it overturns precedents.
The settlement, which followed Sylvia Gonzalez's victory at the Supreme Court, also includes remedial First Amendment training for city officials.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week about the "emergency aid exception" to the Fourth Amendment.
The cases give the justices a chance to address a constitutionally dubious policy that disarms peaceful Americans.
Even well-intentioned “community caretaking” can’t justify ignoring the Fourth Amendment.
Multiple judges say SCOTUS is going out of its way to grant emergency relief to the president without even bothering to explain why.
A set of interviews with the late justice is now available
Thoughts on the New York Times' Selective Survey of District Court Judges
Limits on government power are a venerable and beneficial feature of our system.
Interesting tidbits in an interview with Adam Liptak
Weakening or removing Section 230 would not fix the problems of social media, and in fact it could make things worse.
Plus: Air traffic controllers get mysteriously sick, California gubernatorial contenders can't answer basic questions, and more...
Industry insiders dominate the boards that control who can work, using government power to shut out competitors, protect profits, and block reform.
In a new Supreme Court term packed with big cases, these disputes stand out.
A revealing interview with the Supreme Court's "Steel Magnolia."
This one addresses the issue of whether the owner of a home foreclosed for nonpayment of debt is entitled to "fair market value" compensation, or only whatever the government gets from auctioning off the property, minus the debt owed.
The law is one of several attempts to override the right to bear arms by making it impractical to exercise.
The president thinks he can transform murder into self-defense by executive fiat.
The Justice discusses originalism, common good constitutionalism, and King v. Burwell in a recent interview.
A recent panel discussion on the current Supreme Court.
Which version of the chief justice will emerge in the Supreme Court’s newest term?
Civil liberties attorney Jenin Younes recounts her role in Murthy v. Missouri, her opposition to pandemic mandates, and why she believes Trump poses an even greater threat to free speech than Biden.
Plus: Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote a book.
The decision, which hinges on an exception to the Gun-Free School Zones Act, does not say whether that law is consistent with the Second Amendment.
The Supreme Court will soon review the president’s authority to fire “independent” agency heads.
The president’s attempt to evade the major questions doctrine deserves to be rejected.
Legal scholar Steve Vladeck explains how and why.
"We can do this the easy way or the hard way," the FCC chairman said, threatening to punish broadcasters for airing the comedian's show.
Plus: Pam Bondi flunks free speech 101.
The Supreme Court justice’s new book fails to practice the historical fidelity it preaches.
Should it be the interim docket? The emergency docket? The emergency orders docket? The short order docket? Something else?
The New York Times examines the "sharp partisan divides" on the Supreme Court's interim docket.
Freedom of speech cannot reliably protect conservatives unless it also protects people they despise.
A unanimous three-judge panel concluded that "no historical tradition supports" the 1987 law.
The justice’s stance on immigration enforcement is undermined by the facts of the case before him.
Such a gun ban is not authorized by statute or allowed by the Second Amendment.
The Supreme Court will hear Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety this fall.
There is no majority opinion, so the reasoning is unclear. But Justice Kavanaugh's concurring opinion undercuts principle that government must abjure racial discrimination.