In Chicago, Reason editor at large squares off against former FCC head Tom Wheeler in Oxford-style debate.
They say it's to protect free speech.
Prodding private companies into self-censorship is a dangerous government tradition.
The freakout over the Sinclair Broadcast Group.
The company that brought you that wince-inducing "fake news" promo is not a "monopoly," and cracking down on it will not defend the free press.
The FCC's December order repealing net neutrality preempted sates from reimposing regulations.
No, the government shouldn't nationalize our mobile infrastructure.
There is roughly a zero percent chance Democrats will succeed in blocking net neutrality repeal through the Congressional Review Act.
New rules would require internet providers to be transparent about their services.
But would TV’s favorite libertarian
really favor federal regulation of the Internet?
Set aside the Chicken Little fears about the internet dying.
Reason.com's editor in chief hashes it out with the FCC Chairman who passed net neutrality.
Nick Gillespie, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman and Matt Welch discuss sex scandals and net neutrality.
Do net neutrality advocates fear consumer choice?
Promises that "we're going to see an explosion in the kinds of connectivity and the depth of that connectivity" like never before.
Fifth Column interview, FCC chair announces the beginning of the end of Title II regulatory classification of Internet companies, frets about the culture of free speech, and calls social-media regulation "a dangerous road to cross."
It’s all about deregulation to foster innovation.
Ajit Pai notes that his agency has no authority to consider journalistic content in making license decisions.
"Setting aside the fact that the FCC doesn’t license cable channels," Ajit Pai said last month, "these demands are fundamentally at odds with our legal and cultural traditions."