"Emoluments" Suit Against Trump Can Proceed
Are we all about to get a look - finally! - at Trump's tax returns?
Are we all about to get a look - finally! - at Trump's tax returns?
Georgetown Law's Center for the Constitution Announces $50,000 Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize Winner
A judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit casts a decisive vote four months after his death
Economist Bryan Caplan reminds us that political decentralization has little value unless it is accompanied by mobility.
The Ninth Circuit had earlier held -- citing D.C. v. Heller -- that the Second Amendment doesn't secure a right to concealed carry, but the panel now holds that it secures a right to carry openly (though it reserves the possibility that a state might be able to choose whether to allow open carry or to allow concealed carry).
State may regulate, but not nullify, the right to bear arms.
A useful development, which dozens of court opinions have now used.
Episode 227 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Cornell law professor Michael Dorf asks whether Clarence Thomas would vote to strike down federal laws restricting abortion, on federalism grounds. The answer might well be yes. But the issue would have to be presented to him in the right way.
Check out how the majority and the dissent describe one aspect of the California disclosure rules.
In 1999, Judge Kavanaugh suggested that the Supreme Court case that forced Nixon to turn over the Watergate tapes may have been wrongly decided. But it's not entirely clear what he now thinks about the issue.
Federal prosecutors have indicted two men for attacking Leagle (an online repository of court opinions), RipOffReport (a consumer gripe site), and JaburgWilk.com (the site of a law firm that sometimes represents RipOffReport).
Caligula, Ryan Gosling, and the Miracle on Ice.
A very interesting article from Prof. Robert Steinbuch (Arkansas / Little Rock).
A former Trump advisor thinks an Executive Order could end birthright citizenship. A federal judge appointed by President Trump explains why he's wrong.
Surprising fallout from the Supreme Court's decision on agency fees
The lawsuit contends that the Constitution requires a federal tax deduction for "all or a significant portion" of state income tax payments. It relies on badly flawed constitutional arguments to try to prop up a badly flawed policy.
Indeed, Facebook shouldn't set itself up as the arbiter of historical truth (or scientific truth or moral beliefs) -- and doing that even as to Holocaust denial would just yield pressure for much more.
The Obama Administration took the position that Title VI regulations issued in 1966 turned a statute that prohibits intentional discrimination only into one that presumptively prohibits actions that have a disparate impact based on race, color or national origin. If so, that's an extraordinary extension of the statute. Too extraordinary, given that everything or nearly everything has a disparate impact on some protected group.
The initiative could be reinstated for the 2020 election, however, if the Court concludes that its inclusion does not violate California law.
The panel concludes that the district court didn't abuse its discretion in issuing the injunction -- though the decision is non-binding.
The courts continue to block a California law to confiscate magazines over 10 rounds.
Minnesota state judge Jay Quam took the view that her actions stemmed from a "perfect storm of factors unlikely to ever be repeated."
The Times had published material from a plea agreement that was supposed to be sealed, but had been erroneously released by the court.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concludes that the Federal Housing Finance Agency violates the separation of powers.
How will a Justice Kavanaugh approach administrative law cases?
A new paper on an old way of resolving constitutional indeterminacies
The "right to be forgotten" comes to Texas.
"We remind respondent -- and all other colleges and universities, particularly state-affiliated institutions -- of their unwavering obligation to conduct student disciplinary proceedings in a manner that comports with fundamental notions of due process for the accused, that renders determinations consistent with the facts, and that respects the presumption of innocence to which all students are entitled."
A brewing First Amendment controversy, triggered by newspaper's publishing information about a plea agreement in the policeman's prosecution -- the agreement was intended to be sealed, but was inadvertently briefly released unsealed on the docket.
A Newfoundland court holds (relying on a precedent involving a lesbian couple) that children of polyamorous families may have more than two parents, notwithstanding a statute that would not have allowed this.
Queen Anne's Revenge, Cindy Lou Who, and a pile of deference.
So report Czech media.
The debate over Judge Kavanaugh's views on executive power actually encompasses four separate issues. On some of them his views bode well for the future, on others not so much.
Some unusual amicus briefs filed in support of cert. in Allah v. Milling
I hope I don't have to do that again.
Justice Kennedy was the most speech-protective justice on a speech-protective court. What happens to free speech once he is replaced?
Federal and state courts are divided on whether such injunctions are constitutional, and the U.S. Supreme Court has not weighed in.
Those who have been through the process rarely have nice things to say about it.
The deep meaning of United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 (1906).
This is the state-law version of the debate now happening at the federal level. [UPDATE: A Wisconsin Supreme Court decision a couple of weeks ago took the same view.]
State and Defense Departments comply with revised regulations from May 2018.
School discipline is not the kind of issue that can be controlled from inside the Beltway. In enforcing Title VI, the Department of Education should stick to investigating and responding to allegations of actual discrimination.